Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: 80% CHANCE HILLARY IS GOING TO BE NEXT PRESIDENT
Drudge Report | April 16, 2007

Posted on 04/16/2007 1:33:13 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

RUSH LIMBAUGH: 80% CHANCE HILLARY IS GOING TO BE NEXT PRESIDENT


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; limbaugh; presidency; shewhomustnotbenamed; voldemort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last
Anyone know the context of this statement? The headline, with no text, is on Drudge.
1 posted on 04/16/2007 1:33:14 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I will be in the 20% that will NOT vote for her.


2 posted on 04/16/2007 1:34:08 PM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I was flipping through, but it seemed he said something to the effect if things keep going the way they are and something else about the media. Did not catch the whole context as I was on a very short trip.


3 posted on 04/16/2007 1:34:51 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

He is probably weighing the current Republican candidates’ prospects.


4 posted on 04/16/2007 1:34:55 PM PDT by kddid (Hillary Clinton will never be President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

But Rush is documented to be right only 98.6% of the time.


5 posted on 04/16/2007 1:35:41 PM PDT by SuperSonic (Bush "lied", people dyed.......their fingers purple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JFC

Same here!


6 posted on 04/16/2007 1:35:55 PM PDT by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JFC

I hope this is one of the few times Rush is wrong!


7 posted on 04/16/2007 1:36:03 PM PDT by txroadhawg ("To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Assuming (always a dangerous thing to do, but still...) that things stay politically about where they are right now, if Hillary wins the nomination it’ll be her race to lose.


8 posted on 04/16/2007 1:36:07 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I suppose that makes sense. 20% chance due to legal citizens voting for her. 30% chance due to non-legal immigrants voting for her. 30% chance due to cheating.


9 posted on 04/16/2007 1:36:38 PM PDT by The Blitherer ("What the devil is keeping the Yanks?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

I agree.


10 posted on 04/16/2007 1:37:17 PM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Rush is just trying to stir things up.

Nothing like a Hitlery threat to get Pubs out and voting.


11 posted on 04/16/2007 1:38:02 PM PDT by Mrs.Z
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

I think that the Democrat will win, but I think that Sen. Obama will win the nomination because he’s the most liberal candidate.


12 posted on 04/16/2007 1:38:04 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

I think a Democrat will win too. So far the polls show it.


13 posted on 04/16/2007 1:38:47 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I think Rush sees the money she raises, the lack of a good Republican candidate that people would want to vote for and the “First Woman” BS and comes to that conclusion.


14 posted on 04/16/2007 1:38:48 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

This prospect is simply too gruesome to contemplate. If this happens, I will be forced to admit that crime pays, America is broken, evil wins, good loses, nerve and gall win over courage and honor, and all kinds of other things that I do not want to admit. Please say it isn’t so.


15 posted on 04/16/2007 1:39:10 PM PDT by CaliGirlGodHelpMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Rush started out today's radio program by saying he got at most eight hours' sleep the entire weekend, and he threw a huge bash.

Methinks the Red Bull petered out during the third hour.

16 posted on 04/16/2007 1:39:37 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I was on the phone, so I missed the context tho' confirm Rushes' comment.

Hope it serves as a slap upside the collective Republican head(s) out there.

Gotta get our act together!

17 posted on 04/16/2007 1:39:54 PM PDT by GoldCountryRedneck ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration."- unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

16 years of that witch and Obama.


18 posted on 04/16/2007 1:40:31 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: txroadhawg
Me too. I'm encouraged by the fact that I heard on his show the other day, for the first time I must admit, something really, really dumb: Rush stated that things are no worse today than they were in the fifties.

He then made some idiotic reference to your neighbors in the fifties being swingers with other people just like people are today or some such nonsense.

I almost called him to ask him what states were legalizing gay marriage back then but I was in my car and didn't want to waste a cell call.

19 posted on 04/16/2007 1:40:40 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

some on this forum that don’t know that the democraps won

the 2006 u.s. congressional elections.

(/s)


20 posted on 04/16/2007 1:41:08 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
From today's transcript...

RUSH: See, here's the thing. This is the way this is all shaping up out there. You can't criticize people on the radio. You can't do it. You can't attack them. You can't defend yourself. You can't defend others who are attacked by the Democrats. You can't do this on radio, but you can do it on the floor of Congress. You can go to the floor of Congress, the floor the House, floor of the Senate, and you can say some of the most despicable things about people -- as Tom Harkin has about me or his fellow senators. You can do that all day long and nobody will care. We're not going to stop that. Congressional hearings? How about how they try to destroy the character and the careers of judicial nominees at the Senate judiciary committee? You can do that all day long and Media Matters won't care and the Drive-By Media won't care. In fact, they'll love it. They love it. This is cool, and these senators are written up as great heroes for daring to tell the truth about these despicable conservatives who want to take over the court and deny you women the right to choose, or whatever other fear tactic they lie about. TV news hit jobs? Television news can do a hit job and destroy anybody they want. The New York Times can do a hit job and destroy anybody they want.

But you can't do this on radio, because they're going to come after you! If you do this on radio, if conservatives do this in the alternative media? I'm going to tell you what the objective is out there, folks, in case some of you are all entertained by this. Understand that this is a Democrat Party, Drive-By Media, Clinton image machine -- or Clinton machine agenda -- and it is to suppress and kill conservative information, which it labels "misinformation." The conservative information by definition, according to the template of the Drive-By Media and the Media Matters of the world, is "misinformation," but they will say that their purpose is to eliminate conservative information because it's misinformation, because there's a template, and the template is conservatives are racist, and as such they have to be banned. Of course! In the culture, we can't put up with this. They've gotta be banned from cable. They've gotta be banned from Fox News. They've gotta be banned from radio. Conservatives are also liars. That's another template: conservatives are liars. They gotta be snuffed out -- and this is the purpose of the Drive-By Media, the Democrat Party and the Clintons, who are funding with their supporters all these "watchdog" efforts.

This is Stalinist, folks. This is an attack on certain kinds of information that is protected by a template which says, "All conservative information is misinformation. It is reported by liars and racists," and that's the foundation under which they all proceed, and they're all in on it. That is what is happening. It's a general rule, they would love to do this. But we're gearing up for this election, and if you don't think that in the Drive-By Media and the Democrat Party, if you don't think 2008 is all about the Clintons getting back in the White House, you've got another thing coming. I'm going to tell you as we sit here today, there is an 80% chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States, if you look at the way things are falling out right now. They're trying to take out Rudy Giuliani. Guess what? Rudy's a "draft dodger" now. Did you see the story over the weekend? Well, Clinton was a draft dodger so they got Rudy. Rudy's a draft dodger. Whatever was said about Clinton, they're going after it. Rudy is a draft dodger. Rudy is a philanderer.

Whatever it is, they're doing everything they can to take Rudy out. Everybody says, "Well, what about Obama? What about Obama?" Folks. I know there are stories out there how the Clintons are worried about Obama and not just on this fundraising stuff, but his "godlike status to the godless" and so forth. If you're the Clinton machine, and your single competitor is somebody with less than two years experience in these foxholes, do you really think they are worried about Barack Obama? If you have fallen for the notion that the Clinton machine is sort of upside down and discombobulated and doesn't quite know what's going on here, you are falling for more myths from the media, which is designed to make it look like she has real competition so that she can overcome obstacles rather than be this candidate of inevitability -- which she is. So she's trying to make it look like she's got a serious challenge and she's up to it, and she can handle it. But I'm telling you, I know the Clinton machine. If you think they are seriously worried about somebody with as little experience as Obama has in these kinds of things, then you're falling for it.

You're being sucked in for all this. There is an 80% chance this woman is going to be next president, as things sit here today. In politics, everything can change, and it can change on a moment's notice. But all of these attacks and all of this budding attempt -- and it's not new; it's just intensifying now -- to discredit conservative information as misinformation reported by liars and racists, is about destroying the credibility of anybody who has anything in opposition, to save the Clintons and their quest to be re-ensconced in the White House. It's what all this is about. It's also about making sure that if Mrs. Clinton wins and so forth, that there won't be an alternative media. Hello, Fairness Doctrine. Hello, all of these things to just squelch it. They don't want to hear it. They want to go back to their monopoly days. That's what this is all about. So when you keep talking about this in the context of Imus, it's so much more about things having nothing to do with Imus than you would possibly believe. In fact, don't get distracted when you think about this by putting it in the context of Imus. If it was about Imus, it would be over, wouldn't it? And it's not, is it?

21 posted on 04/16/2007 1:42:11 PM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Considering how our side (voters, not candidates) is pretty much destroying itself in the primary phase and swearing they won’t vote for XX because of XX, Rush may be right. The HSWs are doing a great job splitting us up and keeping us from remembering what unifies our side.
22 posted on 04/16/2007 1:42:37 PM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I agree.
The GOP is screwing up.
The Dems will present us with a Clinton, and the sheeple will accept the turd as a gift.


23 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:16 PM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
“I think a Democrat will win too. So far the polls show it.”

Every poll I've seen shows a Republican candidate leading all Dems.

24 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:23 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Hi Always:

I heard the remark and found myself agreeing.

The context was Imus’s problems. He pointed out that Imus was bonified Drive By Media, except on one count: he hates Mrs. Bill .

Rush figures Mrs. Clinton unleashed her minions, I gather.

Makes sense, considering Mrs. Clinton’s plans to meet with the R-gers team.


25 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:31 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
If Hillary wins, you would get four years of whining from her about how it is everything is someone else’s fault for being as bad as it is.
She would be an embarrassment as the first woman to be President.
Her legacy would be split between doing the best job at busting a good economy and attempting to force socialized medicine down our throats... (again)

If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

26 posted on 04/16/2007 1:44:01 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Thanks for posting. That is numbing.


27 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:11 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Anyone know the context of this statement? The headline, with no text, is on Drudge.


I was watching Rush (ditto cam) when he made the statement. Based on his other comments and my own opinion, he was reflecting on the mess that the GOP has put itself in. Too much division, RINOs, no clear solid candidate that reflects conservative values, leadership issues (there is little) — all of it. There is no fragmentation, basically, within the Dems. It does not really matter who their candidate is, what that candidate stands for, etc. They will vote without question, even if it was Joseph Stalin...well Hitlery aint that far away. The recent election showed how mindless and not unified the Repubs are.

Throw all of that in a blender and that was my take on Rush’s comment. He is as fed up with the spineless weak GOP as many of us are. Hitlery won’t win anything — it will be handed to her on a platter by a dysfunctional GOP.


28 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:12 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
If Hillary wins, you would get four years of whining from her about how everything is someone else’s fault for things being as bad as it is.

She would be an embarrassment as the first woman to be President.

Her legacy would be split between doing the best job at busting a good economy and attempting to force socialized medicine down our throats... (again)

If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

29 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:16 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

Liberals currently lead the polls in both parties. It’s deeply disgusting.


30 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:27 PM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish; Jameison; Sabramerican; BunnySlippers; tkathy; veronica; Roccus; Jake The Goose; ...

((((RUDY PING)))


31 posted on 04/16/2007 1:46:47 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

The Virginia Tech shooting has disrupted Rush Limbaugh program for today, he is upset about this disruption and that is why he saying some very silly stuff today and uttering totally stupid statement like Hillary Clinton has 80% chance of being President when he was saying all along that her chances of being President are small. Do get me wrong, Rush Limbaugh is the best there is in talk radio and by far, he is right in the vast majority of what he said, but some days, specially when something interrupt his prepared program, he just utters very silly and wrong stuff. Today is one of these days.


32 posted on 04/16/2007 1:48:00 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy; All
If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

Don't be so quick. The 2008 elections have a critical point in their term- 2010. In 2010 we go through the standard census redistricting process. If the Dems hold the WH & Congress, you can bet that you will have enough new lines drawn to keep them in power for another decade.

You may also have to kiss the electoral system good bye as well....

33 posted on 04/16/2007 1:48:30 PM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I think that his self proclaimed record of being correct 96% of the time, or what ever it is, is going to take a hit.


34 posted on 04/16/2007 1:48:45 PM PDT by Drennan Whyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

Are You kidding??? We thought Clinton would get 4 years after Jennifer Flowers! They voted for him for 4 more!

35 posted on 04/16/2007 1:49:59 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I agree with Rush. The Hillary and Obama race is being staged. If Obama was not in the race, would that mean all the Obama money would go to Hillary? So istead of 44 million, she would have 69 million in one quarter? Not likely, but rather the George Soros types are splitting their support between the two candidates to create the illusion of a horse race.


36 posted on 04/16/2007 1:50:29 PM PDT by nowandlater (My 2008 Dream Ticket---Romney-Thompson or Thompson-Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater
..and a ‘horse race’ gets a lot more media time than one person coasting along..

Look for a Hillary/Obama ticket for 08..

37 posted on 04/16/2007 1:51:51 PM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
People only let the Dems in because of a 3 year 24-7 anti-Bush anti-war message on all the TV channels.

Figure that they will get over that if Democrats get the WH.
They are already getting a good look at their leadership, which has been to do nothing but block the soldier’s pay and looking to have investigations to begin a scandal.

Democrats are not ready for prime time.
Their only assets are they are loud and play dirty.

They are so bad at leading though that despite what lines are drawn, they are going to lose.
They are so bad that they can’t overcome their own negative with voters long term.

People are NOT in love with socialists/communists, so Dems have a short political life IMO.

38 posted on 04/16/2007 1:53:41 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Women were sexually attracted to Bill Clinton.
Many of them IMO voted their fantasies.

Where is that factor in Hillary (Janet Reno aside)?

39 posted on 04/16/2007 1:56:18 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

You are absolutely correct and if the Clinton machine has been reading FR they are salivating with glee.


40 posted on 04/16/2007 1:59:52 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

If Hillary wins this will be the US version of Vladmir Putin....


41 posted on 04/16/2007 2:01:31 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
She is ugly.
She is not likable.
She doesn’t interview well or come off in public well.
She is far far left and wants socialized medicine in America.
She wants to raise taxes.
She wants to cut and run regarding the war in terror.
Her party has no goals beyond taxing and opening investigations to create nonexistent scandals.

They are doomed if she is elected IMO.

42 posted on 04/16/2007 2:04:32 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Rush is wrong. Polls say that even most Dems don’t trust her. If the Republican party unifies behind a candidate who has a chance of winning, we will win. Otherwise it will probably be Obama or (gag) Edwards.
43 posted on 04/16/2007 2:07:15 PM PDT by KATIE-O ( Rudy Giuliani '08 - Restoring Optimism For The Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Thanks for posting the entire transcript, SocalParrot. I only tuned in to the quote about the 80% chance and almost cried. Rush is giving us a huge wake-up call and we’d better take heed and get our act together pronto.
44 posted on 04/16/2007 2:10:23 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

like I said, if she wins the next Putin... read you descsriptions and apply them to him as well as Hillary.... little difference; both are ruthless and will do anything for power.


45 posted on 04/16/2007 2:12:21 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

The way the country is going. I would not be surprised. I would be sick to my stomach, but not surprised.


46 posted on 04/16/2007 2:13:33 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

This woman thinks Clinton looks and acts like J.R. Ewing
from “Dallas”. Blech! Clinton is an avaricious, philandering thug.

When he’s around watch your daughters and your wallet.


47 posted on 04/16/2007 2:15:43 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

The Virginia Tech shooting has disrupted Rush Limbaugh program for today, he is upset about this disruption

That does not sound like Rush either. I do not get the idea that he is that selfish to consider himself over a national tragedy. But like others have said, he has had lack of sleep and could be grouchy. I have been there...


48 posted on 04/16/2007 2:19:10 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O

I agree, America does not want some shrill shrieking lying witch in the Oval office.


49 posted on 04/16/2007 2:22:11 PM PDT by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Then I’m moving to the Philippines: http://www.livinginthephilippines.com/#1

However, in the meantime, we must do EVERYTHING WE CAN to make sure this doesn’t happen!! I think we should get behind one candidate (Fred Thompson) and make sure he’s a REAL conservative (Fred Thompson) in the mold of Ronald Reagan. Our candidate (Fred Thompson) must be for securing the borders, rounding up illegals, RTKABA, lowering taxes, less bureaucracy, etc...

50 posted on 04/16/2007 2:33:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Iran delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson