Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush grants presidency extraordinary powers
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 23, 2007 | WND

Posted on 05/23/2007 7:00:50 AM PDT by cbkaty

LAW OF THE LAND

Order for emergencies apparently gives authority without congressional oversight

President Bush has signed an executive order granting extraordinary powers to the office of the president in the event of a declared national emergency, apparently without congressional approval or oversight.

The order was signed May 9 without any announcement, says Jerome R. Corsi in a WND column.

Titled, "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive," it was issued with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive.

The order establishes under the office of the president a new national continuity coordinator whose job is to make plans for "National Essential Functions" of all federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president's directives in the event of a national emergency.

"Catastrophic emergency" is loosely defined as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

Corsi says the president can assume the power to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over.

The executive order says the assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, currently Frances Fragos Townsend, would be designated as the national continuity coordinator.

Corsi says the executive order makes no attempt to reconcile the powers created for the national continuity coordinator with the National Emergency Act, which requires that such proclamation "shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress and published in the Federal Register."

A Congressional Research Service study notes the National Emergency Act sets up Congress as a balance empowered to "modify, rescind, or render dormant" such emergency authority if Congress believes the president has acted inappropriately.

But the new executive order appears to supersede the National Emergency Act by creating the new position of national continuity coordinator without any specific act of Congress authorizing the position, Corsi says.

The order also makes no reference to Congress and its language appears to negate any a requirement that the president submit to Congress a determination that a national emergency exists.

It suggests instead that the powers of the executive order can be implemented without any congressional approval or oversight.

Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke affirmed to Corsi the Homeland Security Department would implement the requirements of the order under Townsend's direction.

The White House declined to comment on the order.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bush; buygunsandspam; powers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: cbkaty

Why is this needed when we have the National Emergency Act? What in the Constitution gives the executive the authority to cut out the other branches, and to take over management of the states and of private business?

That emergency definition would have applied to the northeast electrical outage of a couple of years ago, as well as Katrina and other events.

I especially dislike the stealth and lack of comment on this — this is too important and dangerous to be done quietly and without debate.


41 posted on 05/23/2007 1:26:53 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I believe and have from the beginning and I don’t give a DAMN what my fellow FRiends say. Things have been so strange for awhile. Hillary not saying a dang word during 2004 election...Bill said what five sentences that were not even that bad. Friendships, brother, family. Too many weird stuff going on. I have been blasted so many times that you could not imagine. But, I am pretty strong and can take it. You should have seen the licken I took before the last election when I (Gasp) said that we would probably lose the 2006 Senate and House. I was definitely found GUILTY for treasonous (Everyone loves that word around here) statements!!! lol.


42 posted on 05/23/2007 1:41:55 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Thanks for the link — I did some googling myself and was just about to post it. Yes, it looks less sinister — it appears to apply to the executive branch only, and acknowledges that the other two co-equal branches are responsible for their own continuity planning. It bears watching, though.


43 posted on 05/23/2007 1:57:35 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LantzALot
Re: My "congers up..."

Lantz's How did eels get into the discussion?

Gaszooks, guess I screwed up on that...

Boy... I wonder if I should feel eel about this?

44 posted on 05/23/2007 3:35:12 PM PDT by Bender2 (A 'Good Yankee' comes down to Texas, then goes back north. A 'Damn Yankee' stays... Damn it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LantzALot
From Google at http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-18,GGLD:en&q=conger+up+a+spell

one example:

“Buffy the Vampire Slayer” Doppelgangland (1999)
Anya convinces an unsuspecting Willow to assist her with a spell that will ... just a reliable good-two-shoes and agrees to help conger up the "dark arts. ...
www.imdb.com/title/tt0533415/ - 41k - May 21, 2007 - Cached - Similar pages

Guess that bodes eel for Buffy and Anya... eh?

We... are so confused...

45 posted on 05/23/2007 3:46:00 PM PDT by Bender2 (A 'Good Yankee' comes down to Texas, then goes back north. A 'Damn Yankee' stays... Damn it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

Part of this article clearly is not true since it was released by Tony Snows office and the full text is up on the web.

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-51.htm

Maybe it is troubling but we need a different source. This one is simply not credible.


46 posted on 05/23/2007 4:08:06 PM PDT by gondramB (No man can be brave who thinks pain the greatest evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Thanks for the correction...


47 posted on 05/23/2007 4:59:56 PM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

>>Thanks for the correction...<<

And thanks for posting this - It sure as heck bears looking into.


48 posted on 05/23/2007 7:56:58 PM PDT by gondramB (No man can be brave who thinks pain the greatest evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

he is on Coast to Coast AM, right now.

“Prepare to don tin foil headgear” !!!!!!!


49 posted on 05/23/2007 10:33:39 PM PDT by MrStumpy (Its awful embarrassing to get your butt kicked by a one legged man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro Life of the Republic PING.
50 posted on 05/23/2007 10:53:25 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
What would we say if this were Clinton?

We would say, "Monica? Is that you?"

Cheers!

51 posted on 05/23/2007 10:56:05 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
This means one of two things. No, three.

1) H5N1 pandemic
2) Attack on Iran
3) Trouble over the amnesty bill in the Senate.

Cheers!

52 posted on 05/23/2007 10:56:54 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
Laying the foundation for the Hildabeast?

Exactly what I was thinking. Just imagine Queen Hitlery or Queen Chelsea The Conqueror (you know Chelsea will be president one day) with dictatorial powers.
53 posted on 05/23/2007 11:18:45 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis ("I'm not some candy-assed white liberal looking to turn you into better citizens." - Martin Querns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Well shutting off professional sports broadcasts would probably do it.

Is that a "Rex 84" joke? :)
54 posted on 05/23/2007 11:21:09 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis ("I'm not some candy-assed white liberal looking to turn you into better citizens." - Martin Querns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
It even has Roddy Piper confused.
55 posted on 05/23/2007 11:27:55 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis ("I'm not some candy-assed white liberal looking to turn you into better citizens." - Martin Querns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
I don't think Mr. Corsi has assessed this correctly.

The president does have broad power as the head of the executive branch to conduct its affairs: look at the history of the creation of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare under President Eisenhower's Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1953. Congress was only involved when President Eisenhower asked for approval for the reorganization of the Federal Security Agency into a cabinet level Department.

But beyond that, I read NSPD51 and it didn't strike me as anything odd. The language is very similar to most continuity of operations planning that you see, and I didn't see anything that took it beyond the bounds of the executive branch of government.

Maybe I am not seeing some point that is troubling, but to me seeing the administration simply doing contingency planning limited to the executive branch isn't of itself that worrisome.

56 posted on 05/23/2007 11:56:33 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Katrina - that thought crossed my mind, also.


57 posted on 05/24/2007 2:32:04 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

President Clinton’s going to love this.


58 posted on 05/24/2007 4:57:07 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Same here. Lots of knee jerk reactions from people looking for hidden meanings, hidden messages and evil government plotting.

Somtimes a cigar is just a cigar.

(Or it used to be until Bill Clinton stained the image)


59 posted on 05/24/2007 5:46:23 AM PDT by listenhillary (Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Is that a “Rex 84” joke? :)

Sorry - reference is too obscure for me. Not sure what Rex 84 is.


60 posted on 05/24/2007 5:47:33 AM PDT by listenhillary (Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson