Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NSPD 51: President can now establish Dictatorship under Emergency Conditions
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 23rd, 2007 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 05/24/2007 3:20:05 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis

Bush makes power grab Posted: May 23, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern

President Bush, without so much as issuing a press statement, on May 9 signed a directive that granted near dictatorial powers to the office of the president in the event of a national emergency declared by the president.

The "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive," with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive, establishes under the office of president a new National Continuity Coordinator.

That job, as the document describes, is to make plans for "National Essential Functions" of all federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president's directives in the event of a national emergency.

The directive loosely defines "catastrophic emergency" as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

(Column continues below)

When the president determines a catastrophic emergency has occurred, the president can take over all government functions and direct all private sector activities to ensure we will emerge from the emergency with an "enduring constitutional government."

Translated into layman's terms, when the president determines a national emergency has occurred, the president can declare to the office of the presidency powers usually assumed by dictators to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over.

Ironically, the directive sees no contradiction in the assumption of dictatorial powers by the president with the goal of maintaining constitutional continuity through an emergency.

The directive specifies that the assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism will be designated as the National Continuity Coordinator.

Further established is a Continuity Policy Coordination Committee, chaired by a senior director from the Homeland Security Council staff, designated by the National Continuity Coordinator, to be "the main day-to-day forum for such policy coordination."

Currently, the assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism is Frances Fragos Townsend.

Townsend spent 13 years at the Justice Department before moving to the U.S. Coast Guard where she served as assistant commandant for intelligence.

She is a White House staff member in the executive office of the president who also chairs the Homeland Security Council, which as a counterpart to the National Security Council reports directly to the president.

The directive issued May 9 makes no attempt to reconcile the powers created there for the National Continuity Coordinator with the National Emergency Act. As specified by U.S. Code Title 50, Chapter 34, Subchapter II, Section 1621, the National Emergency Act allows that the president may declare a national emergency but requires that such proclamation "shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress and published in the Federal Register."

A Congressional Research Service study notes that under the National Emergency Act, the president "may seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise, restrict travel, and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens."

The CRS study notes that the National Emergency Act sets up congress as a balance empowered to "modify, rescind, or render dormant such delegated emergency authority," if Congress believes the president has acted inappropriately.

NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 appears to supersede the National Emergency Act by creating the new position of National Continuity Coordinator without any specific act of Congress authorizing the position.

NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 also makes no reference whatsoever to Congress. The language of the May 9 directive appears to negate any a requirement that the president submit to Congress a determination that a national emergency exists, suggesting instead that the powers of the executive order can be implemented without any congressional approval or oversight.

Homeland Security spokesperson Russ Knocke affirmed that the Homeland Security Department will be implementing the requirements of NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 under Townsend's direction.

The White House had no comment.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bush; dictator; terrorism; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Yay! The president can grant himself dictatorial powers in the event of a major emergency.

I'm sure most FReepers don't have a problem with it though, because it might be a republican in power.

1 posted on 05/24/2007 3:20:09 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Article is BS. Bush is simply renewing an order to handle catastrophic events. Same order has been around for 50 years.
2 posted on 05/24/2007 3:21:40 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Hillary must be dancing in the streets.


3 posted on 05/24/2007 3:21:44 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

More like we don’t trust Corsi’s accuracy in reporting.


4 posted on 05/24/2007 3:23:13 PM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
No; this supersedes the Depression-era "National Emergency Act", which required Congress to "modify, rescind, or render dormant" Presidential Emergency acts considered inappropriate.

The word Congress isn't even in the directive. All three branches of government are listed, but it says that the President will coordinate among the three to direct policy.

5 posted on 05/24/2007 3:24:31 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; nopardons
President Bush, without so much as issuing a press statement . . . .

Yet Jerome Corsi and World Net Daily found out about it somehow.

6 posted on 05/24/2007 3:25:21 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Ironically, the directive sees no contradiction in the assumption of dictatorial powers by the president with the goal of maintaining constitutional continuity through an emergency.

Ironic indeed.

That's unbelievable, since the moonbats continually claim (as John Edwards did) that 911 was simply an excuse for an Executive Branch power grab.

This plays into such suspicions. Bad politics.

7 posted on 05/24/2007 3:25:36 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (I would rather vote for Lindsay Lohan than Lindsey Graham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

I’m disappointed in Corsi. He usually does better than this. I read the act and it clearly specifies that it only applies to the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of govt. Last time I checked, he already was the “dictator “ of the exec branch as are all POTUS.


8 posted on 05/24/2007 3:25:49 PM PDT by tightwadbob (There is no right way to do the wrong thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Read the directive; that’s all he’s reporting.


9 posted on 05/24/2007 3:25:55 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
A Congressional Research Service study notes that under the National Emergency Act, the president "may seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise, restrict travel, and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens."

Doesn't that just give you the warm & fuzzies? Especially if someone with a black heart (and ugly calves) were to become President.

BTW, if my guns and ammo get requisitioned/seized under this act, then the ammo will get turned in first.

10 posted on 05/24/2007 3:26:13 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

They posted it on the website; all new WhiteHouse postings come up on the website; that’s where the blogs picked it up at.


11 posted on 05/24/2007 3:26:39 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tightwadbob
""Enduring Constitutional Government," or "ECG," means a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government, coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers among the branches, to preserve the constitutional framework under which the Nation is governed and the capability of all three branches of government to execute constitutional responsibilities and provide for orderly succession, appropriate transition of leadership, and interoperability and support of the National Essential Functions during a catastrophic emergency;"

I read it as that the Executive branch will consult with the other two as a courtesy ("comity"). That's how I read it.

12 posted on 05/24/2007 3:30:26 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Here is the non=existant press release:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

(hehe, he even linked to it!)


13 posted on 05/24/2007 3:30:50 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Hasn’t something like this been around since the 1930s?

So, unless we have been living in a dictatorship for almost 75 years, this article is nothing but alarmist moonbattery.


14 posted on 05/24/2007 3:30:53 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

“Same order has been around for 50 years.”

It’s been around since the dawn of the Nuclear Age, but they don’t teach history anymore in Public Schools.

The Federal Civil Defense AdministrationOffice For Emergency Management was established in 1950 by HARRY TRUMAN!


15 posted on 05/24/2007 3:33:53 PM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
This must be how Bush creates the NAU in 2010. He never leaves office. I’m glad Corsi exposed the plot.
16 posted on 05/24/2007 3:35:50 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

And to think—WND used to be a source of information.


17 posted on 05/24/2007 3:37:01 PM PDT by RedQuill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Corsi needs a king size roll of foil.


18 posted on 05/24/2007 3:42:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill
They must be lying because Bush is infallible...
19 posted on 05/24/2007 3:43:23 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Right; because Bush would never do anything wrong.


20 posted on 05/24/2007 3:43:59 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson