Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: SittinYonder
Why do you not understand that a person can not be shot by a toy gun?

WHAT??? Oh my GOD, now it's all CLEAR TO ME! You see, all this time I was laboring under the misconception that toy guns kill people every day and that is why a cop who sees someone with a toy gun should cap them immediately. Holy COW!! You have totally opened a whole new window on reality for me.

Let's just leave it at that, shall we? You'll be happy that I've gotten tired of trying to explain to you that you are missing the point, and I'll be happy to be done with someone who seems to be deliberately obtuse to the point of being ridiculous.

54 posted on 06/27/2007 8:30:00 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: A_perfect_lady
I don't know what's wrong with your ability to reason or comprehend what you're reading.

I've never said cops should always in all situations do anything. I don't make sweeping generalizations like that.

Someone else posted to me:
but what was the cop supposed to do... get close enough to see that it wasn’t a real gun and get shot?

Now, go back and read that sentence one more time ... slowly, for effect. I've purposefully bolded the part of that sentence that I was responding to. I'm going to add emphasis, here, too, in an effort to help you understand: because the kid was carrying a toy gun as opposed to a real gun the cop would have never been shot. It cannot happen that anyone is shot with a toy gun.

Nowhere, in this thread or any other, have I suggested that the cop should have known that.

I have said that my opinion is - having not been there - that when police insert themselves into a situation where they were not called upon that they should exercise a little restraint.

I would suspect the cop that shot the kid would agree with me, because I imagine that unlike you he feels some remorse and regret over the killing of this kid. I further suspect that unlike you he is not blaming the kid.

I have not said the cop did something criminally wrong. In fact, I said I don't think based on this story that he should be prosecuted or fired. I have never suggested that in all circumstances police should wait until someone has fired at them before returning fire.

But as someone who shoots guns and takes it very seriously, as someone who has been with police many times - including once when the police I was standing with were shot at - and has seen how they react and talked to them at length about their training, I do believe that this situation called for restraint that the officer didn't show.

My position on this is shared by the deputies I've talked to about it. You may think you're right, but you're not.

55 posted on 06/28/2007 5:58:30 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic ■Št gehate, ■Št ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille fur­or gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson