Posted on 06/24/2007 1:11:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Corsi’s on record as saying Bush has a secret plan to create the NAU by 2010, or just after his next book, whichever comes first.
The Rockefellers?
I recall giving you dozens of links, rudeboy, two years ago. You wouldn’t read ANY of the documents I posted to you, NOT from Corsi....they were from government websites, and other websites, containing official documents.
At that time, you refused....and you think YOUR PERSONAL OPINION should be what I believe?
Your personal opinions carry the weight they deserve: nada.
I’ve read many many many documents, NOT Corsi....coming out of the White House, governmental legislation, Canada, AND Mexico....along with articles, including those by Corsi. They all add up to much more than what your personal opinions could ever tell anyone.
See what I mean? Just what, exactly, is the globalist/NAU agenda for dealing with Avian flu? I know the SPP has discussed it . . . why should I be alarmed that they have?
I don’t cast pearls before swine....and that’s all YOU are.
You don’t know how to read more than two sentences.
What was at #8? Was it something I posted?
see my post #43. I you want me to repost the DOZENS upon dozens of links I’ve already posted to you and, AND YOU READ the documents, I’ll do that.
But, I’m not wasting my time with someone who WON’T even READ what they’re arguing about.
you’re the one who’s “pointing to the SPP”.
I’ve already said, there’s dozens of documents, bills, and other articles on this.
You won’t read them....that’s YOUR serious problem, not mine.
Let’s try this mathetically. You wish to prove that 2 + 2 equals something other than 4. Fine. You cannot point to material that states 2 + 2 equals 4 and call it proof.
Will you, or will you not, read ALL the documents that I’ve previously posted to you, two years ago?
I’ll repost them. If you care to “discuss” this afterwards, fine....if not....your PERSONAL OPINIONS are just that...and mean absolutely NADA.
I assure you, I've read nearly everything is out there. Because when Corsi says it, I have to check to see how far off-the-mark it is.
So quit your pathetic "you just won't read it" BS. It's amateur sophistry.
I should warn you, I'll expect you to actually make an argument, not simply dump documents on my lap and say, "the information is in there, find it yourself."
It is pathetic...you refused to last time I posted them, yet you had the same "arguments" then, when you were still refusing to inform yourself.
Reading the SPP, or Corsi's articles, by themselves, without reading the other documents, is not informing yourself. It's pathetic that you think I should place any weight on someone's personal uninformed opinions.
It's like pressing the rhetorical Easy Button.
Let me ask you this: do you consider the “article” at the top of this thread “proof,” and do you plan to cite to it as “proof” in the future? I think I’ve discovered your problem. You think citing to someone who hasn’t done their homework completes your homework.
No, it’s like all you bring up is Corsi.
I didn’t. I mentioned that ALL the threads on the NAU are always moved to chat.....you all started in with the “Corsi” smears, once again.
If you can’t argue soundly, that’s the Clinton way....smear.
I think when someone is repeated what I, myself, have seen in articles, read in legislation, read what’s in Mexican government documents, Canadian documents, along with a vast array of other articles which are adding onto that information because of the FOIA act.....I’m saying there’s the ability to understand and comprehend whether or not an article is in or out of context.
How can you do that if you don’t reading anything but articles?
I suspect that once someone finds some evidence, then it will be news. Big news. [chuckle]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.