Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biologists trying to save endangered trout used wrong fish
Denver Post ^ | 09/05/2007 | JUDITH KOHLER

Posted on 09/06/2007 3:13:44 AM PDT by Daffynition

DENVER—A 20-year government effort to restore the population of an endangered native trout in Colorado has made little progress because biologists have been stocking some of the waterways with the wrong fish, a new study says.

Biologists called the finding a setback and a potential black eye but said there is still hope for restoring the greenback cutthroat trout because at least four pure populations of the fish have been identified.

The three-year study was led by University of Colorado researchers and published online in Molecular Ecology on Aug. 28. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is heading the recovery effort, said it is reviewing the findings.

The study said that out of nine populations of fish believed to be endangered greenback cutthroat trout that were descendants of survivors, five were actually the Colorado River cutthroat trout, which look similar but are a separate and more common subspecies.

The other four populations were greenbacks.

The recovery effort by Colorado and federal biologists was thought to be close to its goal of 20 self-sustaining populations of at least 500 fish each. Bruce Rosenlund of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Denver said federal and state agencies working on restoration believed the fish were found in 142 miles of waterways, including in Rocky Mountain National Park.

Researchers, though, said that based on genetic test results, the greenback cutthroat trout's range is only 11 miles of streams.

The study said the results imply that the effort has "failed to improve the species' status."

Rosenlund said other scientists will read and comment on the research. He said biologists working on restoring the greenback trout want to see "the science played out."

"The report is just a continuation of different expert input provided to the team for consideration for restoration," said Rosenlund, the project leader for the agency's assistance office.

State and federal biologists will continue with other key parts of the recovery program, such as habitat restoration.

Colorado Division of Wildlife spokesman Tyler Baskfield said the research results are a setback but state biologists believe the program will succeed over the long term.

"We've been moving fish around in the state since the late 1800s and now the new science comes in and all of a sudden it's a different playing field," Baskfield said.

In 1998, officials projected it would cost $634,000 to bring the greenback to recovery, with the money coming from a variety of sources. It wasn't clear how much of that has been spent. Figures for the recovery project before 1998 weren't available.

The study's lead author, Jessica Metcalf, who recently completed her doctorate in ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado, said scientific advances continue to shed new light on the program. She said there's reason for optimism about the findings.

"Four of the native populations appear to be pure greenback cutthroat trout," Metcalf said in an interview from San Francisco, where she was set to present the research Thursday at an American Fisheries Society meeting.

Greenback cutthroat trout were historically found in the drainages of the Arkansas and South Platte rivers in Colorado and a small part of Wyoming. They were declared extinct in 1937 due to overfishing, pollution from mines and competition from nonnative fish.

Researchers said remnant populations were found in the 1950s in tributaries and provided brood stock for fish raised in federal and state hatcheries and released in their native habitat. The fish was added to the federal endangered species list in 1978.

Other federal agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service, have helped with the recovery program. An overall cost estimate wasn't available.

The greenback, the Colorado River cutthroat trout and the Rio Grande cutthroat trout all evolved in Colorado. A fourth subspecies, the yellowfin cutthroat, is believed to be extinct.

Metcalf said although the greenback and Colorado River cutthroat are closely related, they've likely been different subspecies for about a half million years. One of the challenges facing biologists, she said, was the lack of baseline information about the greenback, which was already "in major decline" when first described in detail in the late 1800s.

In June, federal officials rejected efforts to designate the Colorado River cutthroat trout as endangered, citing a substantial increase in the number of known populations.

University of Colorado professor Andrew Martin, the study's principal investigator, said while the findings might give the recovery program "black eye," the hope is that biologists and agencies will move ahead on recovering the species before it goes extinct.


TOPICS: Pets/Animals; Science
KEYWORDS: endangered; haha
DUH!

Colorado River cutthroat

Greenback Cutthroat Trout


1 posted on 09/06/2007 3:13:45 AM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
This is unforgivable. The endangered ones taste much better.


2 posted on 09/06/2007 3:19:18 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

LOL ... Yum! Trout for breakfast! No better meal! Let’s invite the U of C biologists!


3 posted on 09/06/2007 3:24:47 AM PDT by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Also, it look meatier!


4 posted on 09/06/2007 3:34:53 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Still like walleye the best. Had to go to Canada to get them but it was always a great vacation.


5 posted on 09/06/2007 3:52:24 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Funny you should post that. I imagine the only way they were identifying these endangered fish was through shocking or poisoining a stretch of water and collected the kill.


6 posted on 09/06/2007 3:57:29 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doodad

Well, there's always dynamite...

7 posted on 09/06/2007 4:10:46 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Hhahahahahahahhaahhahahahaha!!!

They spent 20 years and gobs of tax dollars seeding streams with the WRONG fish

delicious

government efficiency at its finest.


just a tiny setback, lol
8 posted on 09/06/2007 4:10:49 AM PDT by GeronL (Fred Thompson '0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
After reading about Krishna's birthday celebration (all quite interesting) and getting into the rhythm of how the native English speakers in India manage to translate everything without articles (a, an, the), I come to this news piece and the guy is saying: "..... while the findings might give the recovery program "black eye,"..."

One does wonder if Krishna could tell the difference in these two fish ~ which are of the SAME SPECIES.

Bet they interbreed.

9 posted on 09/06/2007 4:49:03 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Nothing to see here. Move along. HAHAHA!


10 posted on 09/06/2007 4:51:42 AM PDT by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

It was just a slight setback and they will need more funding


11 posted on 09/06/2007 4:53:52 AM PDT by GeronL (Fred Thompson '0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

ping


12 posted on 09/06/2007 5:22:36 AM PDT by pandoraou812 ( zero tolerance to the will of Allah ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

bookmark


13 posted on 09/06/2007 6:53:29 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

I want government run health care. /s


14 posted on 09/06/2007 10:04:43 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Ping!
15 posted on 09/06/2007 7:29:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, August 29, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson