The Debate Continues

FreeRepublic ^ | 10/23/2007 | Dave Lone Ranger

[GodGunsGuts]

==till, it’s a debate between various religious sects. It’s not a scientific debate at all.

Fine, then both theories should be taught, or neither should be taught in our public schools. Or better yet, privatize education, or allow Americans to take their vouchers or tax credits to the school of their choice, and then all of this becomes moot.

[GodGunsGuts]

==Not allowed in the science classsroom. It’s perfectly OK in, say, rhetoric or psychology classes.

As long as you’re willing to also take Darwin’s natural selection god out of the science classroom as well, I’m perfectly fine with your solution.

==What I’ve asked for several times is evidence that they aren’t allowed to publish in normal scientific journals. None has been provided.

Sorry, I refuse to waste my time trying to convince Darwinists of what they already know to be true, but nevertheless deny. If you really want to know, consult a search engine or go see EXPELLED.

[GodGunsGuts]

Good find! Although, I’m not going to forward it to the Evos because they are simply denying the obvious. If they wish to find out about the persecution campaign being waged by the Temple of Darwin againsts Creationists/IDers, all they have to do is read the writings of the Darwinist faithful. But thanks for the link. I hadn’t seen that one before, and I will definitely add it to my favorites.

All the best—GGG

[Virginia-American]

Fine, then both theories should be taught, or neither should be taught in our public schools.

In science class, we teach science. Since well over 99% of biologists agree that evolution is one of the fundamental parts of their science, it has to be taught.

Fine, then both theories ...

That's part of the problem ID and creationism face, they aren't theories.

Or better yet, privatize education, or allow Americans to take their vouchers or tax credits to the school of their choice, and then all of this becomes moot.

Be careful what you wish for.

[Virginia-American]

As long as you’re willing to also take Darwin’s natural selection god out of the science classroom as well, I’m perfectly fine with your solution.

If I understand what you're ttrying to say (Darwin’s natural selection god ?!) that's impossible. As long as biology is taught, it is necessary to teach evolution, and thus natural selection.

[creationist papers to science journals and thier rejection letters]

Sorry, I refuse to waste my time trying to convince Darwinists of what they already know to be true, but nevertheless deny. If you really want to know, consult a search engine or go see EXPELLED.

You made the claim, you back it up.

[Coyoteman]

You made the claim, you back it up.

Creationists don't need to back up their claims. They are doing creation "science," which has no relation either to real science or to the scientific method.