Skip to comments.
The Death of High Fidelity
Rolling Stone ^
| December 26, 2007
| Robert Levine
Posted on 01/12/2008 9:52:58 AM PST by Mr. Blonde
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
More good stuff on the RS Web site about it, including artists sounding off.
To: Mr. Blonde
I have never heard the word "SOUNDSTAGE" used in recording these days. I have seen and heard the abuse of saturation in many modern mixes.
I have spend many long hours in recording studios and have sat next to some of the greatest producers/engineers of our day. To paint a soundscape with 48 tracks is an art that is all but dead. Modern recordings are done on laptops in the first class sections of Airplanes.
The other part is that most live shows these days are mixed with the kick drum and the bass. I don't want to pay 100.00 bucks to have my head assaulted with with a kick drum that is sequenced to a digital sound into a 5 thousand watt system.
If you have ever had the chance to hear a playback with 2" Ampex 499 tape (analogue) in a studio, you be as infected as I have been with the quest of great sound. The sound of a vinyl on a mid-priced system kills any digital playback that I have ever heard.
2
posted on
01/12/2008 10:31:24 AM PST
by
Afronaut
(Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
To: Mr. Blonde
3
posted on
01/12/2008 10:34:42 AM PST
by
Dysart
To: Dysart
Come on now, don’t pollute a FR with Soulja Boy. I get physically ill whenever his song is played when I go out.
4
posted on
01/12/2008 10:43:20 AM PST
by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: Afronaut
I think the waveforms of With Or Without You on the RS site is very informative to what producers are doing to music today. How can you not feel assaulted when everything is loud.
5
posted on
01/12/2008 10:45:23 AM PST
by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: Mr. Blonde
Perhaps what’s needed is an audio format with some side-channel information that can be used by end-user equipment to implement whatever degree of compression the listener happens to want at that moment. I suspect even audiophiles would probably want compression when they’re listening in a noisy environment, but when listening in a quiet room it’s better to use more dynamic range. While it would be possible for a player to handle compression by itself, a player could do a better job if it had some ‘help’ from a human in the studio.
6
posted on
01/12/2008 4:34:13 PM PST
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: Afronaut
Great post, and especially this, a great paragraph:
I have spend many long hours in recording studios and have sat next to some of the greatest producers/engineers of our day. To paint a soundscape with 48 tracks is an art that is all but dead. Modern recordings are done on laptops in the first class sections of Airplanes.
That says it all, I think.
7
posted on
01/12/2008 4:40:02 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
To: Mr. Blonde
Great article.I am totally into music and high end gear. My favorite recordings are actually “bootleg” recordings that I have taped or got from friends. A field recording that is done with high end equipment can produce unbelievable results.
My best tape ever was Roy Buchanan’s last concert on August 7 ,1988 in my hometown of Guilford,Connecticut.My buddies and I set up a 10 foot mic stand with 2 Nakamichi CM 300 mics twenty five feet from the stage and recorded on Sony portable cassette decks.The result is BETTER than practically most officially released Live albums. The proper equipment placed in the proper place can be awesome.
Todays overproduced “music” is mostly garbage. Throw into the mix the compressed signal....no thanks. When I listen to music its gonna be a Live Concert taped by someone who had the killer mics set up..too many to choose from for me.
To: Mr. Blonde
9
posted on
01/12/2008 5:13:09 PM PST
by
protest1
To: scott says
I hope we eventually get a revolt against all of this. Surely the number of pop starlets getting busted lip syncing will lead to a larger desire to have people with actual talent. There are many bands out there with it that don’t have to resort to studio trickery and hopefully people will start seeking them out.
10
posted on
01/12/2008 7:20:55 PM PST
by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: Mr. Blonde
I can’t understand why so many people are so satisfied with MP3-quality music....not that there’s much that’s been released in the last 20 years that’s worth listening closely to.CD-quality....and SACD and DVD-Audio quality is what I want for my favorite music (50’s & 60’s).
11
posted on
01/13/2008 8:30:57 AM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: sauropod
12
posted on
01/13/2008 8:32:43 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
To: sauropod
readI didn't know folks of your employment category were capable of that? *grin*
13
posted on
01/13/2008 8:36:07 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
To: Mr. Blonde
My stereo dial goes up to 11.
14
posted on
01/13/2008 8:36:54 AM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: big'ol_freeper
Well, feeding ourselves and tying our own shoes were big achievements, I admit. ;-)
15
posted on
01/13/2008 8:37:40 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
To: Drango
16
posted on
01/13/2008 8:39:49 AM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: sauropod
Lil slapped me mumbling something about “blood-sucking contractor”...
17
posted on
01/13/2008 8:40:19 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
To: Gay State Conservative
It is all they know for one reason. Another is you can’t beat the protability. I wish the iPod would play a lossless format like FLAC.
18
posted on
01/13/2008 8:42:33 AM PST
by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: big'ol_freeper
The proper phrase is “sleazy, slimy, bottom-feeding, scum-sucking contractor.”
Or, as another FReeper told me once in reference to Beltway Banditry: “Highway Helper.”
19
posted on
01/13/2008 8:42:43 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
To: Mr. Blonde
Personally, I’m a headphones guy when I’m not driving.
As for recent releases, I think anything by Porcupine Tree is mixed extremely well.
20
posted on
01/13/2008 8:46:19 AM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(In my fantasy world, the Dems run a Zell Miller/ Lieberman ticket...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson