Skip to comments.
Ben Stein's Intelligent Adventure (Review of EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed)
American Thinker ^
| April 13,2008
| Kate Wright
Posted on 04/13/2008 5:17:21 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: SeekAndFind
As history reveals, however, the proliferation of any fascist, authoritarian or totalitarian mindset wreaks grave consequences that are not limited to the atrocities that happened in Hitler's Germany. Stalinism, Maoism, and Communism plagued the 20th Century with the world's most sinister dictators (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, to name a few) who delivered mass genocides totaling well over 130 million deaths.
And let's not forget the totalitarian mindset of the environmental extremist
William Ruckleshaus who, with a single stroke of his pen, outlawed DDT and brought about almost as much death (more than 96,000,000) and suffering (more than 14,000,000,000) in less than 36 years than the Communists and Nazis did in the entire 20th century. Previous to that, DDT had saved over 500,000,000 lives in the two decades it had been in use.
2
posted on
04/13/2008 5:31:20 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: SeekAndFind
I plan on seeing it. Notice not many theaters are running it. It does poke fun at Darwinism.
3
posted on
04/13/2008 5:32:00 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: SeekAndFind
4
posted on
04/13/2008 6:44:09 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: aruanan
I was just thinking about this this morning—that Ruckleshaus was directly responsible for more deaths than possibly any other person in the history of the world. My follow-up thought though, was that had he not outlawed DDT, someone in the Carter administration surely would have.
5
posted on
04/13/2008 6:44:28 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: Coyoteman
The review in Scientific American can be considered “an opposing viewpoint” but it cannot be considered “balanced”.
To: Coyoteman
“For a more balanced review, try this one from Scientific American:”
Scientific American - BALANCED?
You’ve got to be kidding me!
Run by a bunch of homosexuals and PRO EVOLUTION to an EXTREME. No, there is no “balanced view” by that magazine. It’s pur propaganda. At one time it was a scientific magazine. It is not now.
7
posted on
04/13/2008 6:50:35 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Coyoteman
Ben Stein’s Expelled: No Integrity Displayed.
The title alone is a clue about the review ... integrity ... . LOL!!! Have another beer!
8
posted on
04/13/2008 6:51:31 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: SeekAndFind
9
posted on
04/13/2008 6:54:44 PM PDT
by
Uri’el-2012
(you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
To: nmh
Ben Steins Expelled: No Integrity Displayed. The title alone is a clue about the review ... integrity ... . LOL!!! Have another beer!
Thanks, I'll have a glass of wine. Have some more Kool-Aid.
10
posted on
04/13/2008 7:04:28 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: nmh
I assume you can support your statement that SA is ran by homosexuals?
11
posted on
04/13/2008 7:05:39 PM PDT
by
tokenatheist
(Can I play with madness?)
To: tokenatheist
Yeah, look inside the front cover and do some research on who is who. Hubby still insists on getting the rag. Even he, hwo is a die hard evolutionists gets disgusted with the drift away from science. He has a PHD in Physics from the 60’s - he’s not an idiot.
12
posted on
04/13/2008 7:13:28 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: tokenatheist
Check out who the editior in chief, or head editor ... he runs the show and a in your face homo.
13
posted on
04/13/2008 7:15:09 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: visualops
14
posted on
04/13/2008 7:16:34 PM PDT
by
visualops
(artlife.us . nature photography desktop wallpapers)
To: nmh
So can I assume that you have no supporting evidence to backup your statement?
15
posted on
04/13/2008 7:36:50 PM PDT
by
tokenatheist
(Can I play with madness?)
To: Coyoteman
16
posted on
04/13/2008 8:48:35 PM PDT
by
Captainpaintball
(Past wrongs don't make Wright right.)
To: ZGuy
I was just thinking about this this morningthat Ruckleshaus was directly responsible for more deaths than possibly any other person in the history of the world. My follow-up thought though, was that had he not outlawed DDT, someone in the Carter administration surely would have.
Possibly, but what's possible isn't actual. The recommendations of the scientists at the EPA after ALL the hearings (none of which Ruckelshaus) was that DDT did not pose a threat to humans and that it was necessary to keep it as a means to keep malaria under control. I think it probably would have remained legal until the current batch of nuts came to ripeness. Think, though, what the world could be like right now had rapidly developing and relatively more healthy nations not been cast to the malarial Molech again. If we're talking about possibilities, it's possible that these countries would have been even less likely to be susceptible to "sustainable growth" wolves in sheep's clothing.
17
posted on
04/13/2008 9:19:23 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: SeekAndFind
...a journey to uncover the mindset that Darwinism engendered among those with an agenda to replace traditional understandings of God with pure materialism.I've been in the field of evolution science (physiology, biology, etc.) for 48 years and I've never met one of these types.
Couldn't be another "straw man," could it?
18
posted on
04/13/2008 10:13:26 PM PDT
by
Rudder
(Klinton-Kool-Aid FReepers prefer spectacle over victory.)
To: SeekAndFind
Gotta see this one. If for no other reason than the current ivory towers of academia don’t like it. I do so hope Harvard sues Stein. That kind of publicity can pack the theatres.
19
posted on
04/13/2008 10:17:57 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: nmh
Check out who the editior in chief, or head editor ... he runs the show and a in your face homo.
_______
Should we assume that your statement is true simply because you’ve uttered it?
20
posted on
04/14/2008 6:46:45 AM PDT
by
dmz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson