Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-smoking fund in ashes
Tobacco.org ^ | 04/14/2008 | JON CRAIG

Posted on 04/14/2008 9:37:36 AM PDT by dr.zaeus

COLUMBUS - Ten years ago, Ohio won the tobacco lottery.

It was among 46 states to join a lawsuit accusing tobacco producers of using unfair advertising to get smokers addicted to nicotine. Smelling bankruptcy, 11 tobacco companies and industry trade groups agreed to a settlement, promising the states $260 billion in payments spread out over 25 years.

Bob Taft, as the newly elected governor, convinced the state legislature to budget nearly half of Ohio's $10 billion share of the settlement for school construction projects - the state was entangled in a major lawsuit over school funding at the time - and the other half for anti-smoking programs sponsored by the new Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation.

But years of successive raids on the tobacco foundation - mostly to balance the state budget - have depleted its original $330 million endowment...

(Excerpt) Read more at tobacco.org ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; ohio; smoking; waste
What can you say about this. As a man who is married to the daughter of a tobacco farmer, this makes me mad.
1 posted on 04/14/2008 9:37:36 AM PDT by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus

Government is largely an extortion racket. “Pay us, or there will be trouble. But feel good about it, because we’re helping the children.” And then the politicians give the loot to friends and family and when they realize that they spent all the money, they shrug their shoulders and say “We’ll have to get more. We know where there’s an inexahustible supply, you know.”


2 posted on 04/14/2008 9:45:21 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus

The government has behaved the way fools do when they win the lottery; they promptly manage to piss it away.


3 posted on 04/14/2008 9:45:43 AM PDT by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus
Anti-smoking fund in ashes
malfeasance
noun Law.
the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing (used esp. of an act in violation of a public trust).

4 posted on 04/14/2008 9:45:46 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus

Sign up? No thanks.


5 posted on 04/14/2008 9:46:34 AM PDT by subterfuge (Homophobic and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus

Pigs at a trough.


6 posted on 04/14/2008 9:47:35 AM PDT by BinaryBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Sorry about the source. I couldn’t link directly to the Enquirer article. You can find it on their website without a registration, however.


7 posted on 04/14/2008 9:56:52 AM PDT by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus
Wait until the American smoker, who paid all of this money sues, the states to get their money back --- and wins!

The scam was sold as reimbursing the states for the "unfair" public expense of tobacco-related illnesses...

Correct me if I'm wrong.

8 posted on 04/14/2008 11:37:44 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr.zaeus
Personally, I'm glad to see the Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation running out of money.

Their advertisements tend to contain a little truth and a considerable number of lies. Smoking is disgusting enough without lying about it. The people running that foundation should be tossed in jail for a very long time for fraudulently using taxpayer funds to advance their agenda through lies.

Taxpayer's interests aren't served by lying to them. These people are frauds, and should be prosecuted.

9 posted on 04/14/2008 11:40:44 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The scam was sold as reimbursing the states for the "unfair" public expense of tobacco-related illnesses...

That and it was going to pay for 'anti-smoking campaigns'. That's what they told us anyway.

Sadly there were plenty of Freepers who went right along with it, quite joyfully as I recall.

So now we're all supposed to be 'shocked, shocked I tell you' to learn that politicians pissed it away on things that aren't even tangentially related to smoking.

I'm going to step outside for a minute, light a cigarette, and have a good, long laugh.

L

10 posted on 04/14/2008 11:46:11 AM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

I wish I could tell you that you are wrong, but I cant...

That was the exact reason that the money changed hands in the first place.


11 posted on 04/14/2008 11:54:58 AM PDT by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson