Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Browser bruiser: Opera 9.5 versus Firefox 3
CNET ^ | June 19, 2008 5:42 PM PDT | Seth Rosenblatt

Posted on 06/20/2008 7:57:47 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Two of the four major browsers have undergone some big changes in the past two weeks. Firefox 3 is, of course, the big news of the week, pulling down eight million or so downloads in its first 24 hours in the wild. However, the Opera browser updated to its much-awaited version 9.5 last week. Since both of them have got game but for different reasons, let's take a look at how they match up.

Empirically, the two most-cited complaints about browsers are speed and memory. Now, I'm a big fan of Firefox because it's so easy to customize, so despite concerns I had about placing both browsers on "equal footing," it would be misleading to test Firefox devoid of extensions, so I left in my cadre of add-ons, and ran both with fifteen tabs open--a more or less standard browsing session for me.

Using the SunSpider JavaScript test, Firefox 3 scored around 5500 microseconds to process the tested scripts, with a margin of error at around three percent. Opera 9.5 scored about 7280 microseconds on the same test, with a margin of error around 1.5 percent, making it nearly one and a third times as slow as Firefox 3. This isn't surprising, given how long Opera's been using the same rendering engine. Assuming they get to Opera 10 before Mozilla puts out Firefox 4, it would be interesting to go back and re-compare them.

Firefox used approximately 127 MB RAM with the 15 tabs open, while Opera used around 117 MB. This was a little bit surprising, since Opera is definitely running on the older code. It might be attributable to the various extensions I use in Firefox, but it's more likely that ......

(Excerpt) Read more at download.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: firefox; hitech; internet; mozilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2008 7:57:47 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

fyi


2 posted on 06/20/2008 7:58:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Users who browse by cell phone and like to keep all their personal settings synchronized are sure to look favorably at Opera, which has made a name for itself breaking into that market.
3 posted on 06/20/2008 8:00:20 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Many of the newest features in Opera 9.5, like the ability to see if a password works before saving it, are also part of Firefox

this was in Opera prior to 9.5...
4 posted on 06/20/2008 8:11:05 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From CNET:

Four FAQs on Firefox 3

****************************EXCERPT***********************

Posted by Seth Rosenblatt 9 comments

Barely two days old, Firefox 3 has already been downloaded more than 12.3 million times at the time of writing. If you haven't downloaded it yet, you can grab it here for Windows, Mac, Linux, and a Portable Windows version.

The price of early adoption, even on a heavily-tested browser like Firefox 3, is early questions. Here are four you're likely to come across, and please add your own in the comments below. I'll do my best to answer them.

Question one: How do you kill the "awesome bar"?

*****************************snip*************************

Question four: How do I get that incredibly cool plug-in from Firefox 2 to work in Firefox 3 if it hasn't been updated?

Answer: With another plug-in, of course.

MR Tech Local Install has adopted a more descriptive name with a version upgrade for Firefox 3 compatibility. Now called MR Tech Toolkit, it's still the power user's all-purpose add-on. It comes with a Toolbar button for restarting Firefox, and can do just about anything--from modifying config behavior, to changing bookmark- and extension-saving locations, to disabling the throbber.

One of the best things it did in Firefox 2 was disable extension compatibility checking, and it continues to do that quite nicely. Be warned that not all your old extensions will work even with the compatibility feature turned off, but it went off without a hitch for TinyURL Creator--which hasn't seen an update since 2007.

***************************

bit more at the CNET Site.

5 posted on 06/20/2008 8:25:03 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

I know very little about Opera...seems to be used heavily by the new mobile devices...so I hear.


6 posted on 06/20/2008 8:27:26 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I am using it now. Very slick.


7 posted on 06/20/2008 8:30:16 AM PDT by Holicheese (Hillary deserves the CMoH for her time in Tuzla!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I have 4 browsers on my system right now; switching back and forth for whatever reason:

1. Firefox 3.0
2. Opera 9.2
3. K-Meleon
4. Exporer

Love the Opera; the K-Meleon takes a little getting used to but is pretty slick, too. Don’t know about the Firefox, yet. Haven’t used the new version enough.

The main reason I went to Opera and K-Meleon was the feeling that my Firefox was slowing down more and more, even after doing some clean ups.

I like the new ones. Opera and K-Meleon are QUICK!


8 posted on 06/20/2008 9:17:47 AM PDT by Chasaway (Tonto to the Lone Ranger: "What do you mean WE, white man?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

how likely are either of them to be invaded by spyware, trojans and viruses like IE. Sorry if this is a doofus question.


9 posted on 06/20/2008 9:33:57 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
FF3 won't run acceptably on my older laptops -- constantly pages and runs up CPU inexplicably -- but FF2 and Opera 9.5 are fine. The problems with 3 were worst in beta 4 and RC1 -- improved somewhat in 3 final but not enough to use the product on those older laptops.

The simple memory footprint that articles such as this reference is overly simplistic and is not catching something strange going on in virtual memory by the new rendering engine. I have reported a bug.

BTW, FF3 works great on my desktop and I have no complaints at all.

10 posted on 06/20/2008 9:34:11 AM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureĀ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
how likely are either of them to be invaded by spyware, trojans and viruses like IE.

IE has the most exposure because of it's tight interface with Windows,,,Active X etc...

Firefox and Opera ...usually don't suffer that malware problem...

Where you browse and personal habits heavily impacet what other bad things can happen.

BUT the Malware ..virus are always out there trying something new....

I moved to Linux and Firefox and ...so far...have had not problems that I am aware of...

11 posted on 06/20/2008 9:44:39 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chasaway
K-Meleon is a new name to me....

Ok I see it's for Windows....Powered by the same Gecko engine as the Firefox and Mozilla browser

12 posted on 06/20/2008 9:48:36 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Anyone know a good, easy-to-use browser benchmark that includes network access time?

The benchmark mentioned in the article, SunSpider JavaScript test, seems very rigorous, including statisical analysis, but only tests JavaScript

I've looked at iBench, but it needs a huge footprint on your machine apparently (Windows Server 2000, mySQL, and more)

I'm looking for something that loads pages several times over the internet (using my browser on my PC with my internet connection), and makes a statistical summary of the page load times

Kind of like the Numion Stopwatch but with multiple automated tests like the JavaScript test

13 posted on 06/20/2008 10:21:27 AM PDT by SiGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
Here is what some business seem to be using.,...

********************************

Open Source Network Gateway

*********************EXCERPT*******************

Block Spam, Spyware, MySpace & More

Untangle is the free & open source alternative to Sonicwall. In addition to the basics (Firewall, VPN, IPS & routing), Untangle makes it easier to block spam, spyware, viruses, phishing, porn, gambling, MySpace, Facebook, IM, peer-2-peer & much, much more.  

 

Open Source & Free under the GPLv2

See the website for more info including a diagram....

14 posted on 06/20/2008 10:38:28 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
Related resource:

Linux Firewalls: Attack Detection and Response with iptables, psad, and fwsnort [ILLUSTRATED] (Paperback)

************************EXCERPT************************

The majority of the world's digital security professionals focus on defense, because offense is left to the bad guys, police, and military. I welcome books like Linux Firewalls that bring real defensive tools and techniques to the masses in a form that can be digested and deployed for minimum cost and effort.

15 posted on 06/20/2008 10:52:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SiGeek

I’m no help....


16 posted on 06/20/2008 10:54:23 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

.efas m’I dalg m’I ,yoB. ecnetnes a ni srettel eht sesrever yllacitamotua taht erawlam wen siht tuoba draeh ev’I .erawlam ro sesusriv teg t’nseod ti esuaceb xoferiF ekil I


17 posted on 06/20/2008 11:33:00 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

18 posted on 06/20/2008 11:38:40 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Browsers are pretty ho-hum these days. Firefox wins because of its add-ons, particularly Adblock Plus. If a browser doesn’t support real ad-blocking (not just pop-ups) it’s a non-starter.


19 posted on 06/20/2008 11:40:42 AM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Nice post, excellent resources, thanks.


20 posted on 06/20/2008 12:00:32 PM PDT by papasmurf (Unless I post a link to a resource, what I post is opinion, regardless of how I spin it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson