Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

XP still killing Vista in sales volume: HP
APC ^ | 28 July 2008, 3:03 PM | Dan Warne

Posted on 07/30/2008 11:26:26 AM PDT by Salo

Business PC buyers are still overwhelmingly opting for XP, computer giant HP has revealed.

HP's revelation, made at the launch of a new range of business notebooks, flies in the face of Microsoft's persistent PR claims that Vista has sold tens of millions of copies — and is selling at a faster rate than XP ever did.

However, HP explained how Microsoft is coming up with these "Vista" sales figures.

"From the 30th of June, we have no longer been able to ship a PC with a XP licence," said Jane Bradburn, Market Development Manager, Commercial Notebooks for HP Australia.

"However, what we have been able to do with Microsoft is ship PCs with a Vista Business licence but with XP pre-loaded. That is still the majority of business computers we are selling today."

So, in other words, Microsoft counts a sale for Vista, even though the computer manufacturer has really sold XP.

Rob Kingston, Group Manager of Commercial Product Marketing for HP said, "Looking into the crystal ball, I don't think businesses will see much value in upgrading to Vista until late next year, and even so, Microsoft will probably have come out with something else by then."

HP's revelation casts doubt over Microsoft's claims about how many copies of Vista have been sold, as HP has made clear that although a sale may be counted as 'Vista', it may actually be XP.

Microsoft has told HP it will no longer be able to do this after January 2009, but HP's Jerel Chong, Market Development Manager, Commercial Notebooks, said the number one PC maker was already in discussions with Microsoft about how it could push this deadline back.

He said it actually suited HP well only selling Vista licences but actually being able to ship either Vista or XP on the computer. "There's a lot of extra administration that goes with offering both XP and Vista on every computer, and it's all in one now," he said.

He said the feedback he was getting from customers was that they simply hadn't had the time to do full compatibility testing of all their business applications with Vista yet and that the high time and monetary cost of rebuilding system images wasn't worth it while the economy was down.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: microsoft; vista; xp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last
I'm shocked.....
1 posted on 07/30/2008 11:26:28 AM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Tech ping.


2 posted on 07/30/2008 11:26:58 AM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo

They should have named it, Windows ME 2007


3 posted on 07/30/2008 11:28:57 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo
"I don't think businesses will see much value in upgrading to Vista until late next year after the entropic death of the universe.."

Fixed it, no need to thank me.

4 posted on 07/30/2008 11:32:05 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (My grandkids will ask-Was there really a time when I could get on a plane without removing my shoes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

5 posted on 07/30/2008 11:33:10 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Ping.

Bring knee pads...


6 posted on 07/30/2008 11:35:43 AM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Interesting.
The hd shot craps on my laptop.
I figured it was worth 50 bucks to replace it rather than buy a new one with Vista.
Nobody I asked said Vista provided any advantage to them so........
About 4 hours of work, but worth it IMHO.


7 posted on 07/30/2008 11:39:14 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo
Windows 95 was significantly better than Windows 3.1.
Windows 98 was significantly better than Windows 95.
Windows XP was significantly better than Windows 98 (we will not speak of ME).
Windows Vista is significantly prettier than Windows XP.

Has anyone other than Microsoft released a Vista only program yet other than cutesy screen gadgets? It wasn't all that long ago when developers finally abandoned Win 98 compatability and started requiring XP.

8 posted on 07/30/2008 11:39:26 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Whale oil: the renewable biofuel for the 21st century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Ping. 

Bring knee pads...

Dang! 

9 posted on 07/30/2008 11:40:46 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (The McCainiac's creed: Death to America by a thousand cuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salo

I have one steaming pile of crap desktop with Vista. A driver can’t be found for the new printer I bought at the same time. It runs hot, shuts down when it overheats. Just a general pile of junk.

Big box store screwed up my order for an XP desktop replacement and a laptop and now can’t find the machines I want with XP.

So, after being with Microsoft since the beginning of time to run my small office, I’m switching to a Mac.

If I put out a piece of junk like Vista, my company would be dead.


10 posted on 07/30/2008 11:44:48 AM PDT by abbi_normal_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Microsoft’s determination to force Vista down the throats of its unwilling customers has a lot to do with DRM.


11 posted on 07/30/2008 11:45:01 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Windows BOB 2007.


12 posted on 07/30/2008 11:46:49 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

you forgot windows 2000, which was a big improvement over 98, but you are spot on.

vista BLOWS.


13 posted on 07/30/2008 11:47:03 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Windows 2000 Pro was a very good OS.


14 posted on 07/30/2008 11:56:02 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Wow! Almost a half hour and the Microsoft vendors haven’t showed up and flooded this thread with multiple “Vista is really wonderful, you are just too stupid to realize it!” or “Vista is great, it’s your fault for not spending $1000s of dollars & weeks of you spare time upgrading your brand new computer” posts.

Must be a record


15 posted on 07/30/2008 11:58:42 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

Windows 2000 was an update of NT, not 95, 98, Me, or any other OS designed for home use.


16 posted on 07/30/2008 11:59:18 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Delphi for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
It wasn't all that long ago when developers finally abandoned Win 98 compatability and started requiring XP.

Heh. Microsoft just recently announced that it will be ending support for Windows 3.11 embedded.

Because moving from one version of Windows to another just means you have a whole bunch of new bugs to learn how to get around.

17 posted on 07/30/2008 12:01:25 PM PDT by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Windows 2000 Pro was a very good OS.

Still is. My old desktop keeps a' chuggin'...

But mostly I'm using my XP laptop which is a lot newer.

18 posted on 07/30/2008 12:01:48 PM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

“Windows 2000 was an update of NT, not 95, 98, Me, or any other OS designed for home use.”

So is XP


19 posted on 07/30/2008 12:04:15 PM PDT by NathanR ( Drill here. Drill now. Pay less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salo

aside from a couple of minor annoyances, I’m actually enjoying Vista


20 posted on 07/30/2008 12:04:24 PM PDT by DeLaVerdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

What?!?!


21 posted on 07/30/2008 12:06:11 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

XP and Vista both are as well.


22 posted on 07/30/2008 12:07:07 PM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24
Yeah, but 2000 and XP are successful updates of NT...
23 posted on 07/30/2008 12:10:40 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24
Negative, XP is not NT/2000/2003.
Not even close.
24 posted on 07/30/2008 12:11:06 PM PDT by ComputerGuy (Delphi for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

W2000 is where I stopped. If I upgrade again it will be to Linux.


25 posted on 07/30/2008 12:13:31 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DeLaVerdad

I have XP at home and my primary server at work, and Vista Business 32 bit on my work station. They are connected via speedstream router/modem. Mostly they get along, there are some glitches.


26 posted on 07/30/2008 12:14:06 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Salo
Not real surprising.

Not the most honest marketing approach by Microsoft, but at least people are getting a free Vista license with their copy of XP so that if Vista ever becomes a better product for them they can switch over.

It would be nice if they released more accurate sales numbers, but at least customers are getting both what they want now, and what they may or may not want in the future.

27 posted on 07/30/2008 12:16:44 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Windows 2000 Pro was is a very good OS.

I have no reason to change, at least not yet. Of course, most of the time I don't design nuclear weapons or do animation for Hollywood movies.

28 posted on 07/30/2008 12:18:11 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

I’d be willing to risk Vista, under the same conditions I’d risk any other Microsoft OS:

After the first several million paying beta testers have run it through its paces and the 3rd service pack has been released.


29 posted on 07/30/2008 12:19:38 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

DING DING!

We have a WINNER!


30 posted on 07/30/2008 12:20:06 PM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (Obama is making me vote for McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salo

I got a new work laptop on June 29. Vista was deliberately removed and replaced by XP on my machine.

I don’t see any signs that we’ll ever switch to Vista. It would be far too expensive and complicated to re-qualify all of our software for a bug-ridden operating system that is not always backward compatable. If Microsoft ceases to support/provide XP, some enterprising new company(s) are going to do a lot of business, at Microsoft’s expense.


31 posted on 07/30/2008 12:24:06 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: going hot
I have XP at home and my primary server at work, and Vista Business 32 bit on my work station. They are connected via speedstream router/modem. Mostly they get along, there are some glitches.

I've got the Vista 64-bit at work and the only problem I have encountered is with a customized application developed for HP that runs off of iTunes (different registry location - the application won't recognize iTunes) ... and then everything I open in Vista by default is super tiny despite the settings I've applied. I'm getting too old for these teeny tiny screens.

32 posted on 07/30/2008 12:25:53 PM PDT by DeLaVerdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

I don’t know what you’re talking about, but I have always known Windows 2000, XP, 2003, Vista, and 2008 to be on the NT line. Maybe I’m missing something.


33 posted on 07/30/2008 12:26:09 PM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Vista is going to end up on the short list of impossibly stupid business blunders that make it into all the B-school marketing textbooks. Right up there with GM’s attempt to market the Chevy “Nova” in Mexico (few Spanish-speaking people were interested in buying a car that advertised itself as “no va”, though plenty had a good, deep belly-laugh at it), and the infamous “New Coke”.


34 posted on 07/30/2008 12:29:55 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The kneepad comment was unnecessary - his calluses will do just fine. ;-)


35 posted on 07/30/2008 12:37:05 PM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

A cool thing that XP does that I never saw work on NT 4 or Win2000 is that XP sees when someone adds a shared printer to a PC somewhere else on my network...and updates *my* XP desktop to show that newly added printer as an available option, automatically.

So I don’t have to consciously do anything to XP to get it to recognize a new printer. And of course, unlike Vista, XP has all of the drivers for existing printers.

So if I want to use the new printer on someone else’s desk...I just choose that new printer.

No installation. No driver issues. It’s automatically available as a printer when I clink “Print.”

And it all happens in the background for me.

In contrast, Vista won’t even *see* some Win2000 and NT 4 machines on the network, much less that those PC’s added their own shared printers.

But XP does.


36 posted on 07/30/2008 12:38:09 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24
NT/2000/2003 are closely related.
XP uses portions of the NT kernel, but it's designed for the masses.
The major difference from my perspective as a code jockey with 26 years experience is that XP is more tolerant of processes that 'slide around' the kernel and talk to the hardware directly. NT is very restrictive in that area.
btw, NT came from VMS - they both had the same principal designer. Microsoft hired him away from DEC.
37 posted on 07/30/2008 12:39:13 PM PDT by ComputerGuy (Delphi for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DeLaVerdad

XP sucked when it came out, but it finally got service-packed into goodness. Eventually, Vista will get good, too, unless MS does WinMe it and replaces it with Windows 7(?). At this point, it’s pretty badly tainted, so MS might not have much choice.


38 posted on 07/30/2008 12:40:11 PM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Vista IS wonderful. The box is just perfect for leveling one of my old bookcases, it crushes JUST enough without the box failing.

The software inside is a steaming pile of . . .Obama. . .


39 posted on 07/30/2008 12:41:15 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Whaddya mean what? How much harder could you have hit him?  :)
40 posted on 07/30/2008 12:41:51 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (The McCainiac's creed: Death to America by a thousand cuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

Plenty harder. But his skull is thick and hard and numb enough that he usually doesn’t notice.

I didn’t want the guy to get Kneelaria too...


41 posted on 07/30/2008 12:45:09 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Salo

An off topic tech question if you will. Is it possible to make it look like someone sent you an email (they know the email address), when in fact they didn’t? I’m asking because we have a dispute with a customer that insists they canceled an order by email, they forwarded said email for proof, but we have no record of it. We don’t delete emails for 12 months.
Thanks.


42 posted on 07/30/2008 12:46:46 PM PDT by TheRake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salo

I like the Vista interface much more than XPs - very pretty :)


43 posted on 07/30/2008 12:47:49 PM PDT by DeLaVerdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: abbi_normal_2

Welcome to the light! :)


44 posted on 07/30/2008 12:48:36 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheRake

Yeah - you can screw around with the headers to make it look like almost anything happened. Is it possible that he legitimately sent the email, but that you didn’t get it? Like it was caught up in a spam filter or something along those lines? Frankly, it seems like it would be more trouble to fake the email.


45 posted on 07/30/2008 12:50:00 PM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DeLaVerdad

Actually, the first thing I do with any XP I work on is take it out of Teletubby Mode - I prefer the classic interface.


46 posted on 07/30/2008 12:52:53 PM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Microsoft’s determination to force Vista down the throats of its unwilling customers has a lot to do with DRM.

That's one reason I will NEVER upgrade.

47 posted on 07/30/2008 12:56:57 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salo

I have a friend that is 71 years old. I sold him a six month old Gateway laptop as his first computer. No sooner had the warranty run out, the MoBo fried. Yes, I felt badly about it and offered to replace the laptop, but he wouldn’t hear of it, he wanted to buy a new one.

So, he buys new Dell, a 1525 I think. It came with Vista. He was confused with it, his software didn’t run on it. His aircard didn’t work with it. And so it went.

I called Dell and explained the problem, and emphasized that he was 71 and had less than a year’s experience with computing. I asked if they would exchange Vista for XP. No. Could I pay them to sell us XP. No. But then, something else happened. The fella on the phone says to me, in a very strong, almost threatening, way...and if we find out that you put XP on it, you’ll not have a warranty on the machine. We ONLY warranty that purchase with Vista installed!

Even longer story made sort...I ordered him a Sager, sans OS, and installed a new OEM WinXP on it. I sold the Dell at a loss of $400.00 just to be rid of it.

Dell will not get one more dime from me or anyone I have any influence over. Period.


48 posted on 07/30/2008 1:00:33 PM PDT by papasmurf (This space left blank intentionly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy; philsfan24
Negative, XP is not NT/2000/2003.

Yes it is. Stop being stupid. Open a command prompt and read the first line.

NT was 3.5x and NT 4.x
Windows 2000 was Windows 5.0
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
Windows 2003 Server is 5.2.3970

49 posted on 07/30/2008 1:01:51 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

“Windows 2000 Pro was a very good OS.”

Probably their best Windows OS ever.


50 posted on 07/30/2008 1:02:46 PM PDT by papasmurf (This space left blank intentionly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson