Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mind own business, Lindsay Lohan tells police chief
Reuters ^ | Sat Aug 2, 2008 1:27am BST

Posted on 08/01/2008 6:26:08 PM PDT by Perdogg

Lindsay Lohan on Friday had sharp words for the Los Angeles police chief who one day earlier was accused of outing the 22-year-old when he said the star of films like "Freaky Friday" had "gone gay."

"Police chiefs shouldn't get involved in everybody else's business or their personal lives. It's inappropriate," Lohan told the photographers as she made her way through Los Angeles International Airport. Video of the encounter was posted on

(Excerpt) Read more at uk.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: leo; lindsaylohan; myob; police
I have to back Lilo on this one. The police have no business making such comments. As a Conservatarian, I believe it's none of the police's business with whom Lilo sleeps.
1 posted on 08/01/2008 6:26:08 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; sarasota; PennsylvaniaMom; TexasCajun

ping


2 posted on 08/01/2008 6:26:43 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The old broken clock syndrome.

Lilo has this one correct. She should add prosecutors to the list of those who should not disclose info inappropriately.

The US Constitution is the ultimate "Contract with America".

3 posted on 08/01/2008 6:29:59 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president! (it ain't over 'til it's over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I knew she was a thespian.

BTW, do Conservatarians hang out in greenhouses and music schools?

4 posted on 08/01/2008 6:32:59 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
It doesn't look to me like Lohan having "gone gay" has slowed down the pic snappers.......


5 posted on 08/01/2008 6:35:57 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand

No. Conservatarian means I am a conservative when it comes to defense and national security, but a libertarian when it comes to personal liberties, as opposed to a Liberal or a Social conservative. I am a staunch believer in Federalism. This is also known as “Neo libertarianism”, such as Neal Boortz or Larry Elder. Paleao-libertarians don’t believe is the war against Islamofascism.


6 posted on 08/01/2008 6:37:31 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

She has finally found a person she can trust and it’s not shocking that it’s not a guy.


7 posted on 08/01/2008 6:40:06 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I was just being silly, but it’s good you know where you stand. More people should think about such things.


8 posted on 08/01/2008 6:41:35 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Firecrotch, just a thought...when your love life is so well known in the gossip columns that the police chief feels free to talk trash about it to a morning TV news reporter, it ain’t private anymore.


9 posted on 08/01/2008 6:47:48 PM PDT by RichInOC (Bad girls! Go to my room!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

ok so police are supposed to protect public sexual misconduct?


10 posted on 08/01/2008 6:49:15 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Lindsay Lohan on Friday had sharp words for the Los Angeles police chief who one day earlier was accused of outing the 22-year-old when he said the star of films like "Freaky Friday" had "gone gay."

And John Kerry served in Vietnam

11 posted on 08/01/2008 6:50:23 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

The police are supposed to enforce the laws. Lindsay sex life is none of his business, unless she breaks the law.


12 posted on 08/01/2008 6:52:20 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Oh come on. So that explains it?


13 posted on 08/01/2008 6:53:24 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

She’s a Public Figure and He was making a joke, thats it.......


14 posted on 08/01/2008 6:55:05 PM PDT by cmsgop ( Axis of Evil = Iran , North Korea , Rob and Amber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

She’s a celebrity so its in the public interest to know. The same for Obama.


15 posted on 08/01/2008 6:55:13 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

You and I was thinking the same at the same time. What part of town are you from.


16 posted on 08/01/2008 6:56:04 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
police are supposed to protect public sexual misconduct?

Police are supposed to MIND THEIR G-DD-MNED BUSINESS! I have been a mainline National Revuew conservative for more than 45 years, and hate to say this but Lindsay Lohan is totally correct.

17 posted on 08/01/2008 6:56:39 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Obama "King of Kings and Lord of Lords")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

LOL!, Grew up in Newport Beach, worked for Big Radio and all that. I also read TMZ every day :*)


18 posted on 08/01/2008 6:59:38 PM PDT by cmsgop ( Axis of Evil = Iran , North Korea , Rob and Amber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

that is the argument homosexuals use to justify sex acts in public restrooms

why does this cop know Lohan is engaged in homosexual acts?

what was she doing in public to allow him to have such knowledge?

seems like she is just another actress just pushing a public personal lie.


19 posted on 08/01/2008 7:08:21 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Because this is LA and a national story we tend to view it as just more hollyweirdness, but if you think of this in the context of your hometown police chief outing a local celebrity, i.e. a local tv or radio personality, you'll see how very tacky the chief's comments were. I certainly don't think it's actionable in court by any means, and this revelation, if true will probably actually increase her cache in tinseltown. Nevertheless, it's a remark that reflects more poorly upon the chief than it does Lohan.
20 posted on 08/01/2008 7:10:25 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Girls who run around with no underwear on and show their vagina to the world really aren’t qualified to decide what’s “inappropriate.”


21 posted on 08/01/2008 7:12:10 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
That was Brittany Spears, not Lindsay Lohan.
22 posted on 08/01/2008 7:35:33 PM PDT by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: srmorton

No, Lindsay did it too. Twice.


23 posted on 08/01/2008 7:39:58 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
That was Brittany Spears, not Lindsay Lohan.

Nope. It was both. Paris Hilton too. The Three Bimbos of the Apocalypse.

Do a Google image search for firecrotch. It ain't pretty.

24 posted on 08/01/2008 7:44:38 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (DNC = Do Nothing Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
He told local news channel KNBC: "If you notice, since Britney (Spears) started wearing clothes and behaving, Paris (Hilton) is out of town not bothering anybody, thank god; and evidently, Lindsay Lohan has gone gay, we don't seem to have much of an issue."

I agree with you but then I have to admit, what he said was kind of funny.

But on the other hand, when put into proper context the Chief comes off as being rather unprofessional as he “boycotted a Los Angeles city task force meeting to discuss ways to curb paparazzi because, he said, new rules were not needed.”

It’s one thing for the paparazzi to photograph celebrities at public venues but to climb over fences, use helicopters to peer into private back yards and mercilessly stalk people like they do, sometimes recklessly and without regard to the safety of their “quarry” or of bystanders, is a problem that should be dealt with.

Perhaps the antics of Brittney, Paris and Li Lo egg them on but there are others who try to keep their professional and personal separate and have been nearly assaulted when just going about their daily lives. I remember that video of Julia Roberts confronting some paparazzi who were stalking her and driving recklessly as she was picking up her children from school. She chewed them out and rightly so.
25 posted on 08/01/2008 7:56:01 PM PDT by Caramelgal (Just a lump of organized protoplasm - braying at the stars :),)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

It looked something from Predator V Alien.


26 posted on 08/01/2008 8:04:27 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

Houston here. Anywho, good meeting you.


27 posted on 08/01/2008 8:59:33 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

And that goes for the entire Police State in general. Enough is enough already.


28 posted on 08/01/2008 9:28:07 PM PDT by Force of Truth (Legalize the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady; Bubba_Leroy
Thanks. Somehow I missed that "current event" story. I ignore most celebrity gossip stories, but the one about Brittany Spears somehow penetrated my consciousness. As for Google, I resist using that search engine unless I absolutely have to because of their blatant liberal bias.

I guess I have more sympathy for Lindsay Lohan than the other two women because I loved her in The Parent Trap. She was so young and innocent then.
29 posted on 08/02/2008 2:34:08 AM PDT by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

If she’s likes girls, why does she date one that looks like a boy?


30 posted on 08/02/2008 4:56:15 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

That’s what I cannot understand.


31 posted on 08/02/2008 7:34:28 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
I met Lohan once at Chateau Marmont, and she was very sweet and polite. But she did indeed go through a no-panties phase in 2006, at the Venice film festival and here in L.A., getting out of a car in a mini skirt, one knee pointing toward Argentina and one knee pointing toward Siberia, and a Hawaiian volcano in the middle, gaping for the world to see. I mean, when my little sister said, "Look!" and turned the computer toward me, I nearly fell over in shock.

So yes, she can be a sweet girl, but when she calls someone's words "inappropriate," I think "Girl, we have freedom of speech, not freedom of snatch."

32 posted on 08/02/2008 7:49:01 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

My first thought was please, Samantha Ronson is more manly than some straight men I know.


33 posted on 08/02/2008 8:09:57 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

All of a sudden she’s gay? How did this come about? Or is this just another publicity stunt like what Anne Heche did with dating Ellen DeGeneres?

I smell a phoney on this one. People just don’t suddenly go gay.


34 posted on 08/02/2008 8:39:07 AM PDT by faithinchaos (eternal pessimist, recovering optimist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

Good heavens, no. I don’t think there is anything that explains these relationships.


35 posted on 08/02/2008 12:31:58 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: faithinchaos

ha! no, only celebs go suddenly gay, they who have been partying in private since young teens and experimenting with gayness.. and keep their public persona straight for as long as possible, to continue their professional career in a manner pleasing those who do not like gays... then at some point get tired of the charade and go public.... only these folks appear to go “suddenly gay” - btw watch Miley, she is following this same “suddenly gay” path - got to keep the conservatives happy so she can rake in the dough for a few more years... it’s all celeb positioning / celeb handling for the dollars.. follow the money.


36 posted on 08/29/2008 5:53:22 PM PDT by sasquatch33 (thos who are in the media spotlight, will soon behave accordingly... the spotlight corrupts..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson