Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Thomas distributes Obama case for conference
Sonoran News ^ | November 21, 2008 | Linda Bentley

Posted on 11/21/2008 1:36:10 PM PST by hamboy

Justice Thomas distributes Obama case for conference

By Linda Bentley | November 21, 2008

Foreign national certified as presidential candidate
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Wednesday, Nov. 19, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas distributed Leo C. Denofrio’s renewed application for a stay of the election for conference on Dec. 5. 

If four of the nine justices favor review, a hearing will be scheduled.

His first application was denied by Justice David Souter on Nov. 6. However, rules of the court allow for the renewed submission to a justice of choice.

Beginning in October, Denofrio made his way up through the ranks of the courts until his constitutional question as to the meaning of “natural born citizen” reached the Supreme Court.

He submitted an application for an emergency stay to prohibit the use of what he called “defective ballots” in the state of New Jersey because they contained ineligible candidates for the office of President of the United States, and asked that the court order New Jersey Secretary of State (SOS) Nina Mitchell Wells to remove the names of Republican candidate John McCain, Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Socialist Workers Party candidate Roger Calero from New Jersey ballots.

According to Denofrio, the three candidates are not “natural born citizens,” as required by the Constitution to hold the office of President of the United States. 

Denofrio contends Obama, even if it were proven he was born in Hawaii, because his father was born in Kenya, having been born with split and competing loyalties, is not a ‘natural born citizen’ as required by Article 2, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution.”

Denofrio contacted the New Jersey SOS Elections Division on Oct. 22 to determine what steps the SOS had taken to determine whether any of the presidential candidates listed on the New Jersey ballots were eligible for the office.

He was informed by Elections Manager Donna Barber the SOS took no steps to determine eligibility and assumed eligibility based only upon the fact they had been nominated.

However, New Jersey statute requires Wells to make a “statement” wherein she certifies, under her hand and official seal of office, the names … “of all such candidates for whom the voters within such county may be by law entitled to vote at such election.”

On Oct. 23, Denofrio spoke to Barber, who again informed him she had no reason to object to such party nominations and the statutory deadline for objections had passed. Barber specifically stated the Elections Division would not change ballots at such a late date.

Denofrio says New Jersey voters must rely upon the SOS to safeguard the integrity of their electoral process, especially during presidential cycles “when she must be most vigilant of her oath of office.”

If the SOS doesn’t protect the citizens of New Jersey, Denofrio states it is then up to the citizens to command Wells to do so.

As a result of Wells’ “misfeasance,” Denofrio says the state’s ballots contain the names of three presidential candidates who are not, “by law entitled,” to hold the office of President of the United States.

Denofrio states McCain was born in Panama, Calero was born in Nicaragua and Obama’s birthplace has not been verified.

He asks, “If the SOS’s role is clerical, then who is responsible for Roger Calero appearing on the ballots?”

Calero, born in Nicaragua, not only is not a “natural born citizen,” he isn’t even a citizen. He’s a resident alien who also appeared on numerous state ballots during the 2004 presidential election. 

While the Socialist Workers Party was somehow qualified to place its candidate on the ballot in 10 states, five of those states refused to list Caldero on their ballots because he is not constitutionally qualified and substituted candidate James Harris, a “surrogate nominee.” 

Denofrio states, “… had the U.S. legislature intended to grant ‘natural born citizen’ status to all who were born on U.S. soil, then the 14th Amendment would contain the words ‘natural born citizen,’ but it doesn’t … McCain was born in Panama. Panama is not considered U.S. soil, nor has it ever been considered as such.”

The Naturalization Act of 1790 stated, “… the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens ...”

However, Denofrio points out the Naturalization Act of 1795 specifically repealed the 1790 act and replaced it with the same clause except with the words “natural born” deleted.

Denofrio also quotes a section from the U.S. Department of State’s Foreign Affairs Manual, which states, “Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to U.S. jurisdiction and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.”

Denofrio says McCain was neither born on U.S. soil, nor was he naturalized and is a citizen at birth by statute, which is also addressed in the Foreign Affairs Manual.

McCain is neither “natural born” nor naturalized, says Denofrio. Instead, he may claim citizenship from 8 USC 1402(a): “Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after Feb. 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.”

In other words, Denofrio states, “McCain is in the class of citizens who obtain their citizenship at birth, but not from the Constitution, but rather federal statute.”

The Foreign Affairs Manual also addresses the issue of eligibility for president as such: “It has never been determined definitively by a court whether a person who acquired U.S. citizenship by birth abroad to U.S. citizens is a natural born citizen within the meaning of Article II of the Constitution and, therefore, eligible for the Presidency.”

As far as the issues surrounding Obama’s birth certificate are concerned, Denofrio states Obama has not been presented with a legal request from a party with proper standing to command him in any way, and therefore has no legal responsibility to produce one.

However, Denofrio says he believes if “Obama is presented with a legal request from a government authority sanctioned to make such request, that Senator Obama will respond accordingly and put the issue behind him forever.

“That being said, petitioner regretfully submits that since candidate Obama was born to a Kenyan father, he also is not eligible to the office of president since he is not a ‘natural born citizen’ by the Constitution.”

In conclusion Denofrio states had the legislature intended to grant “natural born citizen” status to all who were born on U.S. soil, the 14th Amendment would contain the words “natural born citizen.”

He said, “And so this proposition leads to the logical conclusion that a natural born citizen is a citizen born in the United States to parents, neither of which is an alien. Having an alien parent would tie such person at birth to the possibility of other loyalties and laws. And such a person, even if he is as loyal and devoted to this country as Senators Obama and McCain have proven to be, is not eligible to hold the office of President of the United States.”

Photo: Leo C. Denofrio, who retired his license to practice law to become a professional poker player, appears to have the most promising lawsuit challenging Obama and other candidates' eligibility to become President of the United States under constitutional requirement they be "natural born" citizens.
Courtesy photo

TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; denofrio; leo; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; poker; scotus; thomas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: ckilmer

I found it there and ARE YOU KIDDING ME RIGHT NOW???!!!

Is this real? This is unbelievable — holy crap.

41 posted on 11/23/2008 2:52:40 PM PST by Lovebloggers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers

If this is indeed real it needs to go viral, like yesterday.

42 posted on 11/23/2008 2:54:06 PM PST by Lovebloggers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Phoenix11

“Yay! LOL. I would love Hillary v. Palin.”

Nooooo thanks, we have enough catfights at work as it is!

43 posted on 11/23/2008 3:00:02 PM PST by JavaJumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
I am not arguing Obama's eligibility, I am arguing if Obama (Or anyone else) engaged in fraud and deceit. One being a fraudulent selective service registration, two a person who never had actual US citizenship (In Obama's case read the law at the time of his birth if born in Kenya with an underage mother), taken on citizenship of a foreign country, and not officially applying for US citizenship. All this needs to be investigated, not by "internt warriors" but by the Branch in charge of executing our Federal laws.

Donofrio's, any other private citizen, and Pres. election candidates who were "harmed" have no precedent or teeth. All Obama or anyone else can tell the courts here is my copy of my BC (My original is sealed take it up with the Hawaii government), my selective service records, and my passport if indeed pressed (I doubt it). Now tell me, is the Judicial Branch in charge of seeing if the candidate's BC, selective service records, and official passports are valid? That is the responsibility of another and any "proof" offered by a private citizen would be declared "hogwash" from a looney toon.
44 posted on 11/24/2008 4:30:26 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
We've never had a candidate whose father was a foreigner who never became a citizen.

Does not matter as the law says only one parent needs to be a citizen and automatically since Obama is a naturalized citizen becomes a moot point.

We've never had a candidate who born on foreign soil.

Obama has a BC, selective service registration, and passport "proving" he was born in Hawaii (Annexed 1898, official territory 1900, Statehood 1959). Obama will be laughing/ignoring any challenge.

And yes I am the only one because I could care less if the havoc caused by a Federal investigation of the first part black President intending to deceive by lying about place of origin creates a huge political backlash. If Obama/anyone else indeed tried to falsify records (Again the courts are going to laugh at all the "proof" from private citizens), was an official citizen of Indonesia and if he ever properly applied for US citizenship (Saying he was born in Kenya but committed FRAUD by claiming Hawaii).

For now Obama is a legitimate candidate just by following Federal laws already passed on citizenship/Presidential eligibility. All these lawsuits will be properly met by Obama because he has the "paperwork"/law to back his claims.
45 posted on 11/24/2008 4:54:51 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson