Skip to comments.MARK DAVIS-STAND-IN FOR RUSH TALKS ABOUT OBAMA'S BC
Posted on 12/01/2008 12:00:07 PM PST by spiderfern
Mark Davis opened up discussion for Obama's vaulted birth certificate. He said it was all up to the courts, but he doubted it would go anywhere.
Why isn’t Fox talking about it???????
Unless it’s Walter Williams, I turn it off when there are subs.
Of course it wont go anywhere. The courts are packed with lib judges and the donks control congress.
That’s probably why no one else heard it!?!
Really? You dont like him? Why not? Genuinely curious to know. We listen to him a lot here in DFW on WBAP and he is considered quite popular here
Fox sold out to 0bama, joined the rest of the MSM and began kissing his a$$ sometime around October.
In order to have a hearing on the BHO BC Question all you will need is four Justices on the SCOTUS to agree to hear the case.
On December 5th we will see what these Four Fine Conservative Justices decide.
Isn’t Berg supposed to hear something today in lieu of the lib. Supreme Justice Souter as the result of the Writ of Certiori (sp)?
RE “but he doubted it would go anywhere”
He said about zero 0% chance it will go anywhere. I hope you folks are not counting this, lets have a backup plan if this fails, like stopping democrats spending maybe.
Agreed! Walter is awesome. I had the iPod in the speaker rack listening to classical music instead.
Yes, Obama is required to respond by today in the Berg case.
I like him fine. I’d listen to his regular show if he were local.
I think what Mark was saying is that there is no law currently to compel Obama to show his birth certificate. I don’t know what that is supposed to mean. We extrapolate “You cannot buy beer until you are 21” to mean that you need to show proof of ID that you are 21. If the Constitution says you need to be 35 and a natural born citizen to be President, why can’t we extrapolate that you need to prove it, should either of the two qualifications be in question?
And if he ignores the writ, supposedly the SCOTUS will be insulted—WE WILL SEE????
Yep, I won't listen to him.
Channel flipping this morning and stopped on MSNBC and they were showing a story about the Obama BC lawsuit and explained it was just a crazy rightwing small fraction of peoples that just won’t acknowledge that Obama is going to be president. The way he said it was like we are a bunch of racists! Also said this issue had been resolved months ago and we were just a bunch of lame losers that won’t accept the reality.
The Back Up Plan should have been to win the presidency and not lost 50 House Seats and 12 Senate Seats in the last two cycles.
I just cannot wait to see what the h$## they will do or say when ‘The Mr. “I Hate America” President’ falls flat on his face and amply demonstrates all the dread and foreboding his ‘resume’ has more than justified us in anticipating.
Endless asides and run-on sentences. He sounds as if he just loves to hear himself talk. He's repititious and does not take enough calls. It would be okay if he was interesting but he's not.
Saul Alinsky tactics. Also, 14-year-old schoolgirl tactics. Same thing. People hate to be mocked and called names. Most of us fold into social submission.
WE NEED SOMEONE WITH COURAGE (or a set of cojones).
I like all of Rush's subs. I can't think of one that isn't very, very good.
And if he doesn't?
He is not required to do anything in regardes to Berg.
On December 5th we will see what these Four Fine Conservative Justices decide....
I know time will tell, and I originally thought that it would go nowhere but today there was a thread on FR talking about if the SCOTUS does nothing, what will happen.
It said that any person on trial for a criminal violation of one of the Laws signed by Obama could subpoena his birth certificate to prove that the law was bogus, because Obama is not eligible to be president thereby eliminating the criminal charges. Actually the subpoena is what all the civil suits are about, trying to get him to court to subpoena his records.
If Obama was proven not eligible for POTUS a year from now everything he touched would unravel back to zero.
Now with the above in mind it would seem that the SCOTUS would want to stop this now and not later. It would also look bad on them to let him pass now only to be found out later.
The point is there is some pressure for them to do the right thing, perhaps more than we think.
Because the drive-bys don't want us to. See how simple it is?
Well the leader of the R party is the president GWB and he seems to think ‘he’ did OK, so I guess we won the two elections.
‘And if he ignores the writ, supposedly the SCOTUS will be insultedWE WILL SEE????’
Didn’t Obama already ignore it? In Greg Garre’s waiver to respond it was for the Federal Election Commision, et al meaning the Solicitor General was waiving the right for all 3 defendants to respond
0bama will NEVER be my President!
BS. Read this.
The first criminal case of a law passed or sign by Obama will allow the criminal defendant to demand O’s birth certificate and he will have to provide it. The defendant will have a team of forensic document people.
The defendant will also bring up the Constitution and 14th Amendment in which daddy was a British citizen and even if junior was born in HI then he is still ineligble.
Any law, appointment, treaty, anything will be null and void. You know one state will then file criminal fraud cahrages against him. Say South Carolina.
SCOTUS cannot punt on this. This will not go away.
It will however show contempt to Souter’s order and the Supreme Court.
I wonder if Mark Davis cleared this with Limbaugh before he spoke about it on air. I didn’t hear it because I am boycotting Limbaugh because of his lack of concern and interest regarding the issue of Obama’s birth certificate and the fact that Obama has been hiding it and other important documents.
By not speaking about this critical issue, Rush has let us all down and shown his true colors.
I think he’s awful, as well. I live in the area and refuse to listen to WBAP when he is on air. He’s arrogant, with no earned right to be so, and I despise that style of show. Rush at least has earned the right to his “attitude.” :)
I know this is a real stretch (/sarc), but I predict HUSSEIN’s response will be a motion to dismiss.
Rush has spoken about it on several occasions (of course, if you are boycotting Rush, you probably missed it).. His prediction was it didn’t have legs.
What about stopping GOP spending, too?
He definitely is arrogant. Please don’t misunderstand me. I was genuinely curious. I am not a Mark Davis fan since the days he dumped his dying wife, got an earring, sports car and a girlfriend. He lost a lot of locals after that mid-life crisis.
However, since much of the national audience does not know his personal history, I was wondering what it is about him that turned people off.
It’s my understanding that Justice Souter denied Berg’s request, but the Writ he issued stated that Obama must disclose the vaulted birth certificate to Berg personally.
IMO, I honestly don't think they even need to be pressured... they want this case and it is their branch of government (as guardian of the constitution) that would be harmed irreparably.
As much as everyone thinks they are sitting their in their little robes fretting over mass rioting and protests, they couldn't give two s**ts if cities burn. They are first among equals when it comes to the three branches and cases like this only serve to reiterate that, imo.
That’s the problem with too many talk shows, the host simply offers it up to the callers — who generally contribute nothing of substance. I’m more interested in listening to the guy who gets paid to make political/sports/whatever commentary and does so for a living. I can’t count the number of times I turn the volume dial down because some caller is droning on about something they know nothing about or is simply re-hashing the hosts argument. The real radio talent lies in Limbaugh and Hannity, not the caller.
Oh, and I say that in a good way... they need to be able to rule free from the constraints of Obama, Pelosi and the the folks that will be looting Korean corner stores.
Roger Hedgecock is a good backup for Rush, too, though.
IMO, I honestly don’t think they even need to be pressured... they want this case and it is their branch of government (as guardian of the constitution) that would be harmed irreparably...
Exactly, that is what I trying to say, a self imposed/peer/SCOTUS pressure not external pressure.
Ahh, I gotcha. Great minds :-)
What an idiot he is! That's why we have Courts, Mark, -- to make sure that in the presence or even the absence of a law those in office or seeking office follow the words of the Constitution.
‘Its my understanding that Justice Souter denied Bergs request, but the Writ he issued stated that Obama must disclose the vaulted birth certificate to Berg personally.’
Where did the writ say that?
“Rush has spoken about it on several occasions (of course, if you are boycotting Rush, you probably missed it).. His prediction was it didnt have legs.”
You are correct that Rush has spoken about it in the past. But when he decided that this issue “didn’t have legs” and therefore dismissed it as “nothing to see here”, I stopped supporting him by listening to his show.
Rush Limbaugh could have helped educate more Americans about Obama’s refusal to release his birth certificate and his refusal in providing us with his other “secret” records, but Rush chose not to do that. He buried his head in the sand on this and in doing so, he was no better than the liberal MSM.
Like you wrote on your Home Page:
GWB won 2002 and 2004 but it was a two election plan, after that he destroyed the party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.