Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MARK DAVIS-STAND-IN FOR RUSH TALKS ABOUT OBAMA'S BC
RUSH LIMBAUGH RADIO TALK SHOW | 12/01/08 | Spiderfern

Posted on 12/01/2008 12:00:07 PM PST by spiderfern

Mark Davis opened up discussion for Obama's vaulted birth certificate. He said it was all up to the courts, but he doubted it would go anywhere.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; markdavis; obama; rush; stbc; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2008 12:00:07 PM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

Why isn’t Fox talking about it???????


2 posted on 12/01/2008 12:01:57 PM PST by RC2 (Where is Obama's Birth Certifacte?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

Mark Davis:
Worst.
Substitute.
Host.
Ever.


3 posted on 12/01/2008 12:02:25 PM PST by Carl LaFong (I'm Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

Unless it’s Walter Williams, I turn it off when there are subs.


4 posted on 12/01/2008 12:03:25 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body. -C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

Of course it wont go anywhere. The courts are packed with lib judges and the donks control congress.


5 posted on 12/01/2008 12:04:00 PM PST by Long Island Pete (Facts are stubborn things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

That’s probably why no one else heard it!?!


6 posted on 12/01/2008 12:04:04 PM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

Agreed.


7 posted on 12/01/2008 12:04:37 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

Really? You dont like him? Why not? Genuinely curious to know. We listen to him a lot here in DFW on WBAP and he is considered quite popular here


8 posted on 12/01/2008 12:04:54 PM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Why isn’t Fox talking about it???????<

Fox sold out to 0bama, joined the rest of the MSM and began kissing his a$$ sometime around October.

9 posted on 12/01/2008 12:06:03 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

In order to have a hearing on the BHO BC Question all you will need is four Justices on the SCOTUS to agree to hear the case.

Roberts
Thomas
Alito
Scalia

On December 5th we will see what these Four Fine Conservative Justices decide.


10 posted on 12/01/2008 12:06:14 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete

Isn’t Berg supposed to hear something today in lieu of the lib. Supreme Justice Souter as the result of the Writ of Certiori (sp)?


11 posted on 12/01/2008 12:06:20 PM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern
Obama's bin lyin about almost all aspects of his life from his upbringing through his schooling, his days as a community organizer and through his political career. One day it will all catch up to him and the crystal palace will come crashing down.

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S UPBRINGING

12 posted on 12/01/2008 12:06:30 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

RE “but he doubted it would go anywhere”

He said about zero 0% chance it will go anywhere. I hope you folks are not counting this, lets have a backup plan if this fails, like stopping democrats spending maybe.


13 posted on 12/01/2008 12:06:46 PM PST by sickoflibs (McCain asks: "Did you stupid conservatives really believe me? HA-HA-HA, wait til 09")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Unless it’s Walter Williams, I turn it off when there are subs.

Agreed! Walter is awesome. I had the iPod in the speaker rack listening to classical music instead.

14 posted on 12/01/2008 12:07:38 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

Yes, Obama is required to respond by today in the Berg case.


15 posted on 12/01/2008 12:08:42 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

I like him fine. I’d listen to his regular show if he were local.

I think what Mark was saying is that there is no law currently to compel Obama to show his birth certificate. I don’t know what that is supposed to mean. We extrapolate “You cannot buy beer until you are 21” to mean that you need to show proof of ID that you are 21. If the Constitution says you need to be 35 and a natural born citizen to be President, why can’t we extrapolate that you need to prove it, should either of the two qualifications be in question?


16 posted on 12/01/2008 12:10:34 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

And if he ignores the writ, supposedly the SCOTUS will be insulted—WE WILL SEE????


17 posted on 12/01/2008 12:10:37 PM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong
Mark Davis: Worst. Substitute. Host. Ever.

Yep, I won't listen to him.

18 posted on 12/01/2008 12:11:05 PM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Channel flipping this morning and stopped on MSNBC and they were showing a story about the Obama BC lawsuit and explained it was just a crazy rightwing small fraction of peoples that just won’t acknowledge that Obama is going to be president. The way he said it was like we are a bunch of racists! Also said this issue had been resolved months ago and we were just a bunch of lame losers that won’t accept the reality.


19 posted on 12/01/2008 12:11:36 PM PST by Rapunzel (Never forget Fallujah..S. Helvenston RIP.....Sarah...Sarah...Sarah loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The Back Up Plan should have been to win the presidency and not lost 50 House Seats and 12 Senate Seats in the last two cycles.


20 posted on 12/01/2008 12:11:40 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Because FOX was in the tank for Obama as well as all the other ‘MSM’ before the end of the campaign.

I just cannot wait to see what the h$## they will do or say when ‘The Mr. “I Hate America” President’ falls flat on his face and amply demonstrates all the dread and foreboding his ‘resume’ has more than justified us in anticipating.

21 posted on 12/01/2008 12:11:45 PM PST by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else" Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
Really? You dont like him? Why not? Genuinely curious to know. We listen to him a lot here in DFW on WBAP and he is considered quite popular here.

Endless asides and run-on sentences. He sounds as if he just loves to hear himself talk. He's repititious and does not take enough calls. It would be okay if he was interesting but he's not.

22 posted on 12/01/2008 12:13:39 PM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rapunzel
Channel flipping this morning and stopped on MSNBC and they were showing a story about the Obama BC lawsuit and explained it was just a crazy rightwing small fraction of peoples that just won’t acknowledge that Obama is going to be president. The way he said it was like we are a bunch of racists! Also said this issue had been resolved months ago and we were just a bunch of lame losers that won’t accept the reality.

Saul Alinsky tactics. Also, 14-year-old schoolgirl tactics. Same thing. People hate to be mocked and called names. Most of us fold into social submission.

WE NEED SOMEONE WITH COURAGE (or a set of cojones).

23 posted on 12/01/2008 12:14:01 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I wish he had to respond in person ... no surrogate lawyers to blather his lies for him.
24 posted on 12/01/2008 12:14:27 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong
Mark Davis: Worst. Substitute. Host. Ever.

I like all of Rush's subs. I can't think of one that isn't very, very good.

25 posted on 12/01/2008 12:15:17 PM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Yes, Obama is required to respond by today in the Berg case.

And if he doesn't?

Nothing

He is not required to do anything in regardes to Berg.

26 posted on 12/01/2008 12:15:59 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

On December 5th we will see what these Four Fine Conservative Justices decide....

I know time will tell, and I originally thought that it would go nowhere but today there was a thread on FR talking about if the SCOTUS does nothing, what will happen.

It said that any person on trial for a criminal violation of one of the Laws signed by Obama could subpoena his birth certificate to prove that the law was bogus, because Obama is not eligible to be president thereby eliminating the criminal charges. Actually the subpoena is what all the civil suits are about, trying to get him to court to subpoena his records.

If Obama was proven not eligible for POTUS a year from now everything he touched would unravel back to zero.

Now with the above in mind it would seem that the SCOTUS would want to stop this now and not later. It would also look bad on them to let him pass now only to be found out later.

The point is there is some pressure for them to do the right thing, perhaps more than we think.


27 posted on 12/01/2008 12:16:53 PM PST by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
If the Constitution says you need to be 35 and a natural born citizen to be President, why can’t we extrapolate that you need to prove it, should either of the two qualifications be in question?

Because the drive-bys don't want us to. See how simple it is?

28 posted on 12/01/2008 12:17:21 PM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Well the leader of the R party is the president GWB and he seems to think ‘he’ did OK, so I guess we won the two elections.


29 posted on 12/01/2008 12:17:49 PM PST by sickoflibs (McCain asks: "Did you stupid conservatives really believe me? HA-HA-HA, wait til 09")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern; Red Steel

‘And if he ignores the writ, supposedly the SCOTUS will be insulted—WE WILL SEE????’

Didn’t Obama already ignore it? In Greg Garre’s waiver to respond it was for the Federal Election Commision, et al meaning the Solicitor General was waiving the right for all 3 defendants to respond


30 posted on 12/01/2008 12:18:06 PM PST by LongIslandConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rapunzel
I guess I'm not sufficiently PC, because MSNBC or anyone else is free to call me a racist. I don't give a flip what those scum sucking liberals think, but I will not stop until the Constitution is upheld.

0bama will NEVER be my President!

31 posted on 12/01/2008 12:18:12 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete

BS. Read this.
http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=20210273

The first criminal case of a law passed or sign by Obama will allow the criminal defendant to demand O’s birth certificate and he will have to provide it. The defendant will have a team of forensic document people.

The defendant will also bring up the Constitution and 14th Amendment in which daddy was a British citizen and even if junior was born in HI then he is still ineligble.

Any law, appointment, treaty, anything will be null and void. You know one state will then file criminal fraud cahrages against him. Say South Carolina.

SCOTUS cannot punt on this. This will not go away.


32 posted on 12/01/2008 12:18:19 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

It will however show contempt to Souter’s order and the Supreme Court.


33 posted on 12/01/2008 12:18:19 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

I wonder if Mark Davis cleared this with Limbaugh before he spoke about it on air. I didn’t hear it because I am boycotting Limbaugh because of his lack of concern and interest regarding the issue of Obama’s birth certificate and the fact that Obama has been hiding it and other important documents.

By not speaking about this critical issue, Rush has let us all down and shown his true colors.


34 posted on 12/01/2008 12:18:25 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

I think he’s awful, as well. I live in the area and refuse to listen to WBAP when he is on air. He’s arrogant, with no earned right to be so, and I despise that style of show. Rush at least has earned the right to his “attitude.” :)


35 posted on 12/01/2008 12:19:14 PM PST by I_Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

I know this is a real stretch (/sarc), but I predict HUSSEIN’s response will be a motion to dismiss.


36 posted on 12/01/2008 12:19:21 PM PST by hsrazorback1 (Seek truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

Rush has spoken about it on several occasions (of course, if you are boycotting Rush, you probably missed it).. His prediction was it didn’t have legs.


37 posted on 12/01/2008 12:21:18 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
"He said about zero 0% chance it will go anywhere. I hope you folks are not counting this, lets have a backup plan if this fails, like stopping democrats spending maybe.

What about stopping GOP spending, too?

38 posted on 12/01/2008 12:22:03 PM PST by EricT. (The tree of liberty needs to be watered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: I_Publius

He definitely is arrogant. Please don’t misunderstand me. I was genuinely curious. I am not a Mark Davis fan since the days he dumped his dying wife, got an earring, sports car and a girlfriend. He lost a lot of locals after that mid-life crisis.

However, since much of the national audience does not know his personal history, I was wondering what it is about him that turned people off.


39 posted on 12/01/2008 12:22:32 PM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

It’s my understanding that Justice Souter denied Berg’s request, but the Writ he issued stated that Obama must disclose the vaulted birth certificate to Berg personally.


40 posted on 12/01/2008 12:23:32 PM PST by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll
The point is there is some pressure for them to do the right thing, perhaps more than we think.

IMO, I honestly don't think they even need to be pressured... they want this case and it is their branch of government (as guardian of the constitution) that would be harmed irreparably.

As much as everyone thinks they are sitting their in their little robes fretting over mass rioting and protests, they couldn't give two s**ts if cities burn. They are first among equals when it comes to the three branches and cases like this only serve to reiterate that, imo.

41 posted on 12/01/2008 12:23:53 PM PST by Shady Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

That’s the problem with too many talk shows, the host simply offers it up to the callers — who generally contribute nothing of substance. I’m more interested in listening to the guy who gets paid to make political/sports/whatever commentary and does so for a living. I can’t count the number of times I turn the volume dial down because some caller is droning on about something they know nothing about or is simply re-hashing the hosts argument. The real radio talent lies in Limbaugh and Hannity, not the caller.


42 posted on 12/01/2008 12:23:56 PM PST by ERJCaptain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Shady Ray
As much as everyone thinks they are sitting their in their little robes fretting over mass rioting and protests, they couldn't give two s**ts if cities burn. They are first among equals when it comes to the three branches and cases like this only serve to reiterate that, imo.

Oh, and I say that in a good way... they need to be able to rule free from the constraints of Obama, Pelosi and the the folks that will be looting Korean corner stores.

43 posted on 12/01/2008 12:27:31 PM PST by Shady Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Roger Hedgecock is a good backup for Rush, too, though.


44 posted on 12/01/2008 12:28:57 PM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Standing for America! 63% for McCain-Palin on 4 Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shady Ray

IMO, I honestly don’t think they even need to be pressured... they want this case and it is their branch of government (as guardian of the constitution) that would be harmed irreparably...

Exactly, that is what I trying to say, a self imposed/peer/SCOTUS pressure not external pressure.


45 posted on 12/01/2008 12:28:58 PM PST by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll

Ahh, I gotcha. Great minds :-)


46 posted on 12/01/2008 12:31:05 PM PST by Shady Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
I think what Mark was saying is that there is no law currently to compel Obama to show his birth certificate.

What an idiot he is! That's why we have Courts, Mark, -- to make sure that in the presence or even the absence of a law those in office or seeking office follow the words of the Constitution.

47 posted on 12/01/2008 12:32:05 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spiderfern

‘It’s my understanding that Justice Souter denied Berg’s request, but the Writ he issued stated that Obama must disclose the vaulted birth certificate to Berg personally.’

Where did the writ say that?


48 posted on 12/01/2008 12:33:18 PM PST by LongIslandConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

“Rush has spoken about it on several occasions (of course, if you are boycotting Rush, you probably missed it).. His prediction was it didn’t have legs.”

You are correct that Rush has spoken about it in the past. But when he decided that this issue “didn’t have legs” and therefore dismissed it as “nothing to see here”, I stopped supporting him by listening to his show.

Rush Limbaugh could have helped educate more Americans about Obama’s refusal to release his birth certificate and his refusal in providing us with his other “secret” records, but Rush chose not to do that. He buried his head in the sand on this and in doing so, he was no better than the liberal MSM.


49 posted on 12/01/2008 12:34:50 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Well the leader of the R party is the president GWB and he seems to think ‘he’ did OK, so I guess we won the two elections.

Like you wrote on your Home Page:

GWB won 2002 and 2004 but it was a two election plan, after that he destroyed the party.

50 posted on 12/01/2008 12:35:06 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson