Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joint CHP-Marine Corps Checkpoint Raises Suspicions
KESQ ^ | Dec. 16, 2008 | Nathan Baca

Posted on 12/19/2008 2:10:53 PM PST by decimon

he California Highway Patrol in the High Desert and the Twentynine Palms Marine Base are receiving dozens of calls complaining about a controversial DUI checkpoint. Military Police joined the CHP for a recent checkpoint in Yucca Valley.

(Excerpt) Read more at kesq.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: martiallaw; paranoid; possecomitatus; tinfoil; training
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: decimon
If the CHP is involved there are no good intentions.
21 posted on 12/19/2008 2:28:44 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

>>>>>>If people would read the ENTIRE article — they would see there is no cause for concern.... NONE.<<<<<<<

There’s a lot of that going around on FR lately.

The next step is to handhold people through the article paragraph-by-paragraph.


22 posted on 12/19/2008 2:31:59 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: decimon
But SP is a detail and not an MOS, no?

Yes and No. For me it was just a detail. My MOS was CTM Cryptography, but I was often accompanied by Master at Arms (MA's). Master at Arms are basically Navy Police. I'm no slouch, but these guy's were mostly 6'4" and 250. Nice to have backing you up in case of trouble.

23 posted on 12/19/2008 2:32:13 PM PST by Blackhawk (God said it, I believe it, That settles it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: angkor
There’s a lot of that going around on FR lately.

Lately? That's been SOP here for a decade.

24 posted on 12/19/2008 2:33:42 PM PST by mnehring (Happy Holy-Days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Probably okay, I stood Shore Patrol...

But SP is a detail and not an MOS, no?

Many years (actually decades) ago, there was no distinct rate for SP; individuals from visiting ships were detailed in support of a port's local semi-permanent shore patrol detachment. (The locals knew the town; the ship's personnel knew their fellow crew members.)

If I'm not mistaken, the Navy now has a Master At Arms rate as its own specialty.

25 posted on 12/19/2008 2:35:45 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: angkor
Hey, weren’t you that swabbie who once carded me for that 3.2 “beer” I was drinking at NTC?

Only if it was in '77. Then maybe could be. Loved the watches at the Club carding and breaking up fights. Never dull, never boring and I could smoke. Can't smoke when doing Roving Patrol. Well, could, just don't get caught.

26 posted on 12/19/2008 2:38:25 PM PST by Blackhawk (God said it, I believe it, That settles it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

Loved that movie (They Live!). Most chilling line: “I have one who can SEE.”

The original story was about meat-eating aliens, and while good, I liked Carpenter’s Earth-aa-a-Third-World-sweatshop better. The earth men who sold out are todays “Free Traders”.


27 posted on 12/19/2008 2:40:46 PM PST by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
If the CHP is involved there are no good intentions.

Now you'll have Erik Estrada all worked up.

28 posted on 12/19/2008 2:41:16 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I don’t believe folks with actual experience are allowed to post on these conspiracy threads.


29 posted on 12/19/2008 2:43:21 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bob
If I'm not mistaken, the Navy now has a Master At Arms rate as its own specialty. Yep. Didn't know that there didn't used to be but we had them from at least '76 on.
30 posted on 12/19/2008 2:43:27 PM PST by Blackhawk (God said it, I believe it, That settles it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
I don’t believe folks with actual experience are allowed to post on these conspiracy threads.

I was hoping someone with MP experience would chime in.

31 posted on 12/19/2008 2:46:02 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: decimon

29 Palms marines....

You know, if they picked any other marine contingent that would be one thing. But 29 Palms is famous for being the groups of marines that were given the “would you shoot civilians” questionnaires.


32 posted on 12/19/2008 2:57:26 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blackhawk
If I'm not mistaken, the Navy now has a Master At Arms rate as its own specialty.
Yep. Didn't know that there didn't used to be but we had them from at least '76 on.

Well, that fits. I got out in 1975. AFAIK, at the time, Masters at Arms were pulled from other rates and given job-specific specialized training. (As I said, it's been decades.)

33 posted on 12/19/2008 3:04:30 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; decimon; SFR; truth_seeker; stylin_geek; river rat; Global2010; mad_as_he$$; ...
“No worries, mate. This’ll all be peachy when it's a joint CHP/ObamaCorps checkpoint operation. There won't be but a few complaint calls then, and they'll be quickly taken care of.”

Anybody know what is up with this Civilian Police Force taking up with the Marine Corps? Does this sound paramilitary? Links:

http://www.usmccle.com/civLawHome.htm

34 posted on 12/19/2008 3:13:04 PM PST by 444Flyer (Razzle Dazzle 'em and they'll never catch wise...right 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

“Do the military branches send their police, into towns where the servicemen visit?

Shore Patrol, MPs etc? I thought they DID.”


Having dodged MPs when I was in beautiful downtown Leesville La. without a pass during basic training, I would say yes.


35 posted on 12/19/2008 3:14:13 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: decimon

What the heck?!?!


36 posted on 12/19/2008 3:18:24 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Looks like they are hiring (not enlisting) civilian police to supplant or supplement MPs. Like hiring civilian cooks.


37 posted on 12/19/2008 3:21:53 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Military Police regularly work with Government Police all across the Nation.
Have done so since I was a Military Police Officer back in 1970’s


38 posted on 12/19/2008 3:22:22 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
What's wrong with just using MP’s? They are bringing in civilians alongside the MP’s on base. Wouldn't there be a conflict of interests between those being the civilian force and the Marine’s own MPs? Whom answers to whom I wonder. What jurisdiction does the Civy force answer to? What happens when this “civilian force” is called off base and must deal with civilians rather than military personnel? What other purposes could a specialized force of 1200+ civilian officers who have been trained alongside the Marines serve outside of serving on bases?

Lots of questions...(especially with Obama coming into play in a month).

39 posted on 12/19/2008 3:32:24 PM PST by 444Flyer (Razzle Dazzle 'em and they'll never catch wise...right 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

>>>Lately? That’s been SOP here for a decade.<<<<<

Proud author of 14,000 FR posts and not a single article read!


40 posted on 12/19/2008 3:36:01 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson