Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fawn
People who let their cats roam the neighborhood apparently want to have it both ways. First they want the cat to be considered a wild animal, which by law allows them to let it roam without them suffering any legal trouble for whatever damage the cat does. Then they want the cat to be considered their tame pet when it gets into trouble while roaming.

I say if it's roaming, it's a wild animal and it's subject to being shot on sight. If it's a pet, keep it indoors or contained on your own property. One or the other.

DOGZ RULE

<FLAME RESISTANT SUIT ON>

Semi-Official Semi-Legal Notice: This is only a test. Had this been an actual anti-cat post, there would have been far more violence. And cow bell. And dog poop.

28 posted on 12/30/2008 10:28:06 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace
I say if it's roaming, it's a wild animal and it's subject to being shot on sight

Thank you for that bit of information. So, I can shoot birds, neighbors dogs running loose down the road, possum, snakes, neighbors kids crossing my yard and it's all legal huh? Good.

34 posted on 12/30/2008 10:31:22 AM PST by Fawn (I want my bailout too!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace

Cats hate you, too. Nanny nanny neener neener.


38 posted on 12/30/2008 10:35:40 AM PST by LiberConservative ("I, you know, can see, you know, upstate, you know, from my house, you know.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson