I made a similar point about the recent case of the woman who shot the man alleged to have abused her son in court, having died of cancer.
To many posters here she was a hero for killing a “paedophile”, despite the fact that the man had been found guilty of nothing as he was in court awaiting his trial. Maybe the guy was as guilty as hell but until he’d had his trial no one could know for sure, but just like if a woman accuses a man of abuse he is automatically assumed to be guilty so many posters take the position that if a man is accused of being a paedophile he must automatically be guilty and should be shot on sight.
People need to understand that the Bill of Rights is their friend.
A lot of people will not believe you. After all, you are a man and women can do no wrong. I came very close to being a statistic. I was warned and was able to avoid the trap my ex had set.