Skip to comments.
Flat-screen TVs to face energy-efficiency rules in California
Los Angeles Times ^
| Jan. 3, 2009
| Marc Lifsher
Posted on 01/04/2009 1:11:24 PM PST by decimon
Reporting from Sacramento -- That 52-inch, flat-screen television on the family room wall may have a terrific picture, but there's a big drawback: It's an energy hog.
State regulators are getting ready to curb the growing power gluttony of TV sets by drafting the nation's first rules requiring retailers to sell only the most energy-efficient models, starting in 2011.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: electronics; energy; greens
Pssst...wanna but a plasma TV?
1
posted on
01/04/2009 1:11:25 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
requiring retailers to sell only the most energy-efficient models, starting in 2011. attention Nevada retailers, your ship is coming in.
2
posted on
01/04/2009 1:13:14 PM PST
by
Vaquero
( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Vaquero
attention Nevada retailers, your ship is coming in. What's sold in Vegas stays in LA.
3
posted on
01/04/2009 1:15:16 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Another lib law thats easily circumvented at the expense of California business.
4
posted on
01/04/2009 1:16:20 PM PST
by
omega4179
(Bush Abandoned Ramos and Compean)
To: decimon
State regulators are getting ready to curb the growing power gluttony of TV setsSomeone needs to curb the growing power gluttony of state regulators.
To: decimon
Actually, if you’re not completely CLUELESS, there are different settings on the TV that change how much energy it ‘hogs.’ They set them super bright in the stores to lure you in. No one needs them ‘showroom bright’ at home. *SHRUG*
6
posted on
01/04/2009 1:16:59 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
To: decimon
Local retailers take the hit and Amazon gets even more sales.
To: decimon
"They should take them off the shelves," said Sam Ortega, a retired state worker. "We need to monitor our energy. It's good for everybody."Sam Ortega, Retired State Worker, Fellow Comrade, Useful Idiot.
8
posted on
01/04/2009 1:18:14 PM PST
by
Flycatcher
(Strong copy for a strong America)
To: Las Vegas Dave
9
posted on
01/04/2009 1:18:19 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: decimon
Television manufacturers should discontinue sales to CA then. Let Californians go back to watching this:
To: Snickering Hound
Local retailers take the hit and Amazon gets even more sales.Expect this: "Item cannot be shipped to California, Vermont..."
11
posted on
01/04/2009 1:19:56 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Actually, this article is misleading. Plasma TV's are power hogs, but LCD flat screens are more energy efficient than older Cathode Ray Tube type TV's. The reason they are reporting higher 'average' power consumption for LCD's is that the 'average' LCD TV purchased might be about 46", while the 'average' CRT TV purchased might be about 32".
To: decimon
Mike McMaster, president of Wilshire Entertainment Inc., worries that a rush to impose TV efficiency standards "would be basically the end of our business." His locations in Thousand Oaks and Valencia employ 54 people and specialize in sales and installation of custom home theater systems centered on extremely large TVs. This is CA in a nutshell.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I think I had one of those. Could never manage to find a round plug for my telephone, though.
14
posted on
01/04/2009 1:22:37 PM PST
by
decimon
To: CaptainMorgantown
The reason they are reporting higher 'average' power consumption for LCD's is that the 'average' LCD TV purchased might be about 46", while the 'average' CRT TV purchased might be about 32". Probably right.
15
posted on
01/04/2009 1:23:50 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Well, I still have a 1050s tube console TV in the garage (yep still works) I wonder how much power that thing draws?
16
posted on
01/04/2009 1:26:07 PM PST
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: svcw
Oh come SVCW not 1050 - 1950 1950...................
17
posted on
01/04/2009 1:27:06 PM PST
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: decimon
What’s wrong with allowing consumers to choose the most energy efficient models for themselves ? Or what if energy companies can generate whatever is demanded of them ? Why do we need f***ing bureaucrats telling us what we can or can’t use ?
18
posted on
01/04/2009 1:28:40 PM PST
by
libh8er
To: svcw
Oh come SVCW not 1050 - 1950 1950...................Viking TV? Who knew? ;-)
19
posted on
01/04/2009 1:30:12 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Big Brother is watching what you’re watching!
20
posted on
01/04/2009 1:30:34 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(For more information on America's "new direction" read The Road to Serfdom. by Friedrich A. Hayek.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Big Brother is watching what youre watching!And wasting energy doing so. But it's all for your own good.
21
posted on
01/04/2009 1:32:29 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
If it weren't so pathetic it would be funny. California politicians jump the shark on a daily basis anymore.
22
posted on
01/04/2009 1:33:26 PM PST
by
pepperdog
(The world has gone crazy.)
To: All
Great, so the state of California wants to pick winners and losers in the panel wars. So much for the best technology winning or at least letting the consumer decide.....
23
posted on
01/04/2009 1:35:05 PM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: decimon
Oh man, you got me. We need an edit button to change our posts. I caught that mis-type but to late.........
24
posted on
01/04/2009 1:39:59 PM PST
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: svcw
Probably less than the computer you’re using right now, or less than the spare refrigerator in my basement circa 1960 that only has maybe half a dozen bottles of beer in it and nothing else.
25
posted on
01/04/2009 1:40:34 PM PST
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: decimon
And what is the consequences of not meeting the stupid rules? Ahh, err, ahhh, ummmm, you say, well you will have to pay a tax.
The beauty of it all ...
26
posted on
01/04/2009 1:41:27 PM PST
by
Tarpon
(America's first principles, freedom, liberty, market economy and self-reliance will never fail.)
To: svcw
We need an edit button to change our posts.I've wished for one more than once. FR is a cruel mistress.
27
posted on
01/04/2009 1:44:46 PM PST
by
decimon
To: Tarpon
And what is the consequences of not meeting the stupid rules?Well, if you're drawing too much juice then you have grow lamps or a plasma TV. "Knock knock...Police!"
28
posted on
01/04/2009 1:47:04 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Or maybe use a generator.
That’s what grow houses around here use.
29
posted on
01/04/2009 1:54:13 PM PST
by
Tarpon
(America's first principles, freedom, liberty, market economy and self-reliance will never fail.)
To: svcw
Does it look like this?
30
posted on
01/04/2009 1:57:34 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Tarpon
Or maybe use a generator.Oh cool. Not only TVs on the black market but generators to go with them.
31
posted on
01/04/2009 1:57:58 PM PST
by
decimon
To: svcw
Uh... I think you meant “too late”.
To: decimon
You are on to something. The usual response to Communsim is the black market it creates, buy in cash from other black marketeers. Around here, workers are already asking “cash only”.
Set up your sources, don’t get coaught in the rush.
33
posted on
01/04/2009 2:00:59 PM PST
by
Tarpon
(America's first principles, freedom, liberty, market economy and self-reliance will never fail.)
To: willgolfforfood
Are you sure?
I thought too was the same as also.
But it’s true, I am always getting these two “to. too” mixed up.
34
posted on
01/04/2009 2:02:14 PM PST
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Nope, this is CA with the nuts out of the shell and trying to run things.
35
posted on
01/04/2009 2:05:35 PM PST
by
allmendream
(Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Television manufacturers should discontinue sales to CA then. Let Californians go back to watching this:Hey!! How did you get a picture of my TV !!!
36
posted on
01/04/2009 2:10:31 PM PST
by
MrPiper
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Cool TV. LOL. I remember my dad had one of the early remote control TVs, a Philco, back when I was growing up. Must have been a late 50’s model. Beautiful wooden cabinet. He had it hauled off just a couple years ago. Wish he’d kept it.
To: decimon
California’s state government has solved all their other problems and now they’ve moved on to regulating flat screen TVs.
$48 billion deficit check
Illegal Immigration check
Massive Foreclosures check
Companies leaving CA check
Flat Screen TVs ?
To: decimon
LCD -- liquid crystal display -- sets use 43% more electricity, on average, than conventional tube TVs
That cannot possibly be true. They must be comparing 42" LCDs with 21" tubes. CRT based TVs get hot (heat = energy). Full sized ones have big high voltage power supplies inside. Businesses that have gone from 17" CRT monitors to 17" LCD screens find their electric bills go down. (Similar technology from an energy usage standpoint).
39
posted on
01/04/2009 3:25:56 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: decimon
What is wrong in CA? Is the water poisoned or are they all just plain freakin’ nuts?............
40
posted on
01/05/2009 5:47:19 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
To: Red Badger
What is wrong in CA? Is the water poisoned or are they all just plain freakin nuts?............Control freakin' nuts. On the one hand, the control freaks would control the nuts. On the other hand, the nuts are the control freaks.
Maybe it's the water.
41
posted on
01/05/2009 5:55:03 AM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
".... the vast majority of them flat-panels. LCD -- liquid crystal display -- sets use 43% more electricity, on average, than conventional tube TVs; larger models use proportionately more. Plasma TVs, which command a relatively small share of the market, need more than three times as much power as bulky, old-style sets..."
From Tiger Direct Specifications on a 42 inch LCD TV
" Power Consumption: 300W"
42 inch Plasma Specifications
".. Power Consumption: 573W.."
Did the guy who wrote this article also write about global warming? I don't see 300 watts as a big deal. Even the 573 watts on the Plasma is not that bad. If there was a 42inch tube TV the power requirement might be less, but how much less. Also as time goes by it will get harder and harder to get tube tvs.
To: CaptainMorgantown
To: Anti-Bubba182
I don't see 300 watts as a big deal. Even the 573 watts on the Plasma is not that bad.If there's an 800 pound electrified gorilla then that would be refrigeration/air conditioning. TVs are comparative spider monkeys.
44
posted on
01/05/2009 10:25:14 AM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Right! AND if you want ANY TV in the not too distant future it won’t be one with a Cathode Ray Tube. This is an area where the legislators will get their heads handed to them if they regulate too much.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson