Skip to comments.Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN
Im smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar themeshow proof you were born in the United States.
But now because just one of these nuisance cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.
First, theyve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral Colleges votes) to discuss Bergs writ of certiorari; the case cant be dismissedBerg will have legal standing!
And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Bergs injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral Colleges votes!
Theres no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially its a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesnt comply by January 16th, the Justices will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral Colleges vote count!
So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Courtwell guess what? Obamayouve already lost! Checkmate!
I’m not a lawyer but work with/for one who’s gone to the SCOTUS and obtained certiorari. Don’t know the inner workings of the Court, but they receive 6-8K petitions a year and accept fewer than 100 for argument; some are granted certiorari but sent back to the court below without a SCOTUS hearing. The odds for any petitioner are poor.
This is my layman’s view of what happens: I think all petitions are initially read by the justices’ clerks; most are rejected. Then the lawyer/petitioner can go back to a single Justice for review, based on the Justice’s area of jurisdiction. Each Justice is assigned certain appellate areas (circuits). If that is rejected, the lawyer/petitioner can choose one more Justice whose history might show a sympathy to the issues raised for review. Then, if that Justies DOES find the issues to be worthy of SCOTUS consideration, s/he brings to Conference. At Conference they discuss all the cases and decide which to grant certiorari.
As in “no controlling legsl authority” Al Gore.
Quite a few admit that amusement is their motive. Seeing s lying criminal crackhead marxist thug elected doesn’t bother them; they get their jollies by taunting and sneering at those who see the grave davger and are not only concerned but many who are actually doing something about it.
(i’m not contributing much lately ‘cause only one arm fuctional snd still sick...)
if only the supremes would read these threads, we’d be fine.
Next you can assure Jim that you are not a particular-issue-troll, in this case CertifiGate. Thanks for your faithful work on our Helicopters.
Yes, I agree.
On the one hand, there’s no way the SCOTUS is going to make him show anything. Like it or not, that’s just the way things are.
On the other hand, I do find it odd that he wouldn’t have ended all this crap months ago by providing the original. That makes me a bit suspicious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.