Skip to comments.Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN
Im smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar themeshow proof you were born in the United States.
But now because just one of these nuisance cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.
First, theyve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral Colleges votes) to discuss Bergs writ of certiorari; the case cant be dismissedBerg will have legal standing!
And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Bergs injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral Colleges votes!
Theres no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially its a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesnt comply by January 16th, the Justices will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral Colleges vote count!
So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Courtwell guess what? Obamayouve already lost! Checkmate!
How is Obama “checkmated” just because the court ssets a couple hearing dates?
Decisions are announced the Monday following the conferences, around 10am, IIRC. Whatever they decided on Friday the 9th will be announced on Monday the 12th.
Perhaps not, be he could put an end to this.
For whatever reason, he’s chosen not to.
I will be pleased if I am wrong, but I’m not.
Think about it.
If you were a Supreme what would be your greater fear?
1) An incompetent illegal alien hires a hit man to kill me or;
2) An radical-islam-supporting-illegitimate POTUS allows terrorists to bomb the Supreme Court.
Isn’t it a no-brainer? bo’s buddy ayers already bombed the Capitol. If the SC allows bo to be POTUS, they must know that the SC will be bombed within days by bo allies, since the SC is our last Civil Defense against bo.
Because it makes the need to raise money for this “fight” an easier sell. As best I can tell so far all this is about is extracting money from as many conservative’s pockets as they can sell on the validity of their “case”. I would file it under “scam”.
From what I can tell he feels he has already put an end to it from the earlier release of the BC on the web. As a practical matter most attorney’s would say that once you start reposnding to these types of frivilous suits you just invite more.
Just like every thread claims he traveled to Pakistan when it was prohibited for Americans to travel there (travel was not prohibited). If you repeat something so many times people will accept it as the truth and say "it must be true because I've read about it so many times on the internet!"
In this case, the argument goes something like this: Routine motions to dismiss have been filed on Obama's behalf. Lawyers are expensive. Therefore, Obama must have spent hundreds of thousands (sometimes millions) of dollars fighting to keep his birth certificate sealed (something the State of Hawaii does for free in accordance with state law).
At this point, that's probably the best guess.
After The One gets impeached, or moves home to a thatched hut in Kenya, perhaps measures to prevent such a problem again will be quietly implemented....like asking for a damn birth certificate at the state level when running for the nomination.
The cost to Berg so far would be at a max $500 and his time.
Ahh the paid obamabot rears its head right on cue.
Pure fantasy. You’ve lost it dude.
Don't wanna miss out on all the fun!
You must be a masochist.
Sums up Bambi in total.
Obama has already lost because of other facets.
On November 13, allegations surface that the Selective Service System registration form showing that Obama registered for the draft is a forgery. The forms document location number (DLN), 0897080632, indicates a 2008 entry into the federal system, because the first two digits (08) indicate the year. (Had Obama registered in 1980, the first two digits of the DLN would have been 80, rather than 08.) Obamas document also appears to be a 1990 form, modified to look like a 1980 form. The date the form was signed is July 30, 1980, yet the form has a date stamp of July 29. The date stamp reflects the letters USPO for United States Post Office, but in 1980 the letters would have been USPS, for United States Postal Service. A retired federal agent had requested the Obama form via the Freedom of Information Act; it took almost a full year for the document to be found. Note that Obamas story about registering for the draft has changed more than once. He originally said he registered for the draft on 1979, when he turned age 18, but there was no requirement to register at that time. Note that failure to register with the Selective Service is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or up to five years in prison; it also renders the individual ineligible for any job in the Executive Branch of government or the U.S. Postal Service [483,493]
An Obama campaign spokeswoman tells reporters that lawsuits attempting to force the candidate to prove he is eligible to serve as President are garbage. At the same time, Obama continues to refuse to produce his birth certificate, and has sheriff’s deputies stationed at two hospitals in Honolulu, where they are preventing press inquiries and attempts to request copies of records. 
How are they frivolous? He produced a forged CoLB document towards a straightforward constitutional requirement. Frivolous cases do not get forwarded for conference in SCOTUS 5 times. Note that most of the trolls operating on these threads do not answer these contentions. We’ll see if that doesn’t apply to you.
I hope the attorneys continue to tell him not to respond if the SCOTUS requests a copy of the long form BC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.