Skip to comments.Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN
Im smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar themeshow proof you were born in the United States.
But now because just one of these nuisance cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.
First, theyve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral Colleges votes) to discuss Bergs writ of certiorari; the case cant be dismissedBerg will have legal standing!
And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Bergs injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral Colleges votes!
Theres no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially its a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesnt comply by January 16th, the Justices will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral Colleges vote count!
So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Courtwell guess what? Obamayouve already lost! Checkmate!
We have seen riots in several major cities before. Half the country will not riot. Most will get up in the morning and go to work, at least those dems who have a job.
The lower courts have only stated that the complainants did not have standing or have said nothing. IMO, they have merit alright.
Is that sorta like needing to get George Washington's signature on it? Nothing is going to happen. Now if the 62 million that voted against Barry were to be know to riot, then we might here the case. The pacifist will get s*%# on.
SCOTUS has been watching this for a while, and they learned a thing or two from Fitz, when he yanked the bait and sprung the trap when it became clear to him that he was about to catch something much bigger than he had set out to catch and far larger than his trap could contain and he could deal with.
IF the Zedi warbler is dumb/arrogant enough to take the oath and assume the office, knowing that he is ineligible and a fraud, then he is as guilty as he can possibly get of as much as he can possibly be guilty of. They don't want—NEED—to catch him with his hand in the cookie jar; they want—NEED—to catch the whole of his inglorious be-haloed self deep enough inside the cookie jar so that there is plenty of headroom left over when they slam the lid shut.
A. The amount of time justices have spent pondering these frivolous cases can probably be measured in minutes.
B. No court has ordered Obama to produce his birth certificate. At any rate, they'd have to order Hawaii to produce the vault BC as it is the state's property, not Obama's.
C. Even if produced, Berg's followers would just claim it's a forgery.
D. Even if proven authentic, Donofrio's followers would claim it doesn't matter due to his Kenyan father's lack of American citizenship.
E. Should SCOTUS rule in the affirmative on Obama's natural born status, they'll just be accused of legislating from the bench.
Where would it end with the conspiracy crowd? The people who want to believe that Obama isn't eligible to serve as President will never be convinced otherwise.
He will never gain standing. Whatever the merit it is not going to ever come through Berg.
Americans were not prohibited by the US from going to Pakistan, it is just that at that time visas to Americans were not being granted by Pakistan.
The chief reason his BC* from HI would be sealed is that he was legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro when Mama Stanley Dunham married the fellow.
* If indeed there is one. This fellow is a very slippery character, note please, that on his Illinois Bar Registration, he claims to have never been known by another name. This is very weird.
If you think they will not rubber stamp Obama...oh well.
Once the SCOTUS throws it down to a lower court, then he’d have to file that stuff with them. Ask the resident constitutional scholars like Congressman Billybob about whether the case has merit before you go down that troll path. There’s a big sign: “Going down this path makes you a CoLB troll”. You’re likely to end up on lj’s list of CoLB trolls.
How is it frivilous? It has been ruled that he has no standing to bring the issue forth.
***First: That could be due to the fact that damages were “theoretical” until Obama became Pres Elect. The case has not been thrown out due to lack of standing since that time. Second, if he could not ever have standing, the case (along with the other 3 that have been forwarded) would never have been forwarded. Third, the fact that they’ve been discussing this stuff in conference shows that it is not frivolous, and your reply does not address this, which is typical of a troll who seeks to misdirect.
All he has to do is make an application with the Supreme Court to have his Writ to request a conference. It is not referred or forwarded by any other court.
***This does not make sense. You might want to elaborate on it.
He can not do it. Thats why. But it will be swept under the rug along with the rest of the shreds of the Constitution. With this bunch it is a dead duck.
We have seen riots in several major cities before.
***Like she said, it would make the 1960’s look like a garden party.
Half the country will not riot.
***But they’ll support those who do.
Most will get up in the morning and go to work, at least those dems who have a job.
***Most = 50.1%. That leaves a quarter of the country to riot. Some who look at that math are in BLOAT mode. It turns out, zer0bama is the best gun salesmen in the last 40 years.
No he has them hidden in a boys life magazine in his bathroom.
As for the 62 million voters? I am not so sure.
Break that 62 million down.
Take away the non-dim “I am giving the finger to the GWBA administration” voters.
Take away the non-dim “I am sending a message to the Republican Party” voters.
Take away the non-dim “I am going to punish the GWBA and/or Republican Party” voters.
Take away the non-dim “There's no way in H3ll I am voting for John McCain” voters.
Take away the non-dim “There's no way in H3ll I am voting for Sarah Palin” voters.
Take away the non-dim “There's no way I am voting for McCain AND Palin” voters.
Take away the non-dim “I am voting for something other than the status quo, even though I cannnot tell you what a satus or a quo is, or what that something I am voting for is” voters.
Take away the non-dim “I am scared I'll lose my Medicare, Social Security, government subsidized ____________” voters.
How much of that 62 million figure remains?
We can take away some more if we need to.
A lot of really good people voted for Zed for a lot of really bad reasons, including a lot of people who saw him as the least bad among really bad choices.
The party-line dimmiecrat bread and circuses crowd voted for a good time on the promise of someone else’s dime. They're going to learn a hard lesson in party planning in a couple of weeks, when they experience firsthand just how much fun one can have for how long on a ten-cent promise.
Riots are not a major concern.
bo’s support is a myth. He got the votes of supposedly 20%? of US population, not 50%. Much of the supposedly 20%? was fraudulent. His supporters are gutless liberals, drug addicts, and the ignorant dregs of our society, non of whom will riot. His radical-islamist supporters may riot, but that is what Gitmo is for, to put the terrorists in permanent incarceration where they are no threat to mainland USA.
No, the Supremes are not concerned about riots if they declare bo ineligible. Their major concern is a certain terrorist attack on Washington if bo gets control of the CIA, the Military, the Justice Dept. etc.
I’d never say never. The Supreme Court could take the case because they have broad discretionary powers for review for reasons they see a probable constitutional crisis taking place.
(Lafayette Hill, PA 01/09/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obamas lack of qualifications to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, [is in the U.S. Supreme Court with two (2) Conferences scheduled on 1/09/09 & 1/16/09] announced today that the U.S. Supreme Court has not made a public decision yet regarding his case. Berg said, I am making these remarks because of the wrong statements circulating that the case of Berg vs. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court has been dismissed. We checked with the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday afternoon, January 9th and no decision has been made. We will have to wait until at least Monday for the decision regarding what took place at the Conference on January 9th.
So there ya go....we have to wait until Monday, the 12th.
I wouldn’t get my hopes up, nor would I send Berg any money.
If nothing else, Zero the Antihero’s continued refusal to lay his cards face up on the table for all to see has ensured and resulted in the SCOTUS, not to mention how many lower courts, being tied up with having to address the matter.
A. The amount of time justices have spent pondering these frivolous cases can probably be measured in minutes.
***Bull shiite, trolldrewd
B. No court has ordered Obama to produce his birth certificate. At any rate, they’d have to order Hawaii to produce the vault BC as it is the state’s property, not Obama’s.
***And your point is?
C. Even if produced, Berg’s followers would just claim it’s a forgery.
***Many would. And Polarik would examine it with his jaundiced eye, sell his book and make money off it. Lucky for him. Exactly how does this further your point that the courts WOULDN’T be tied up? It doesn’t.
D. Even if proven authentic, Donofrio’s followers would claim it doesn’t matter due to his Kenyan father’s lack of American citizenship.
***Again, how does this further your point? It doesn’t.
E. Should SCOTUS rule in the affirmative on Obama’s natural born status, they’ll just be accused of legislating from the bench.
***By trolls like you. I can live with that.
Where would it end with the conspiracy crowd? The people who want to believe that Obama isn’t eligible to serve as President will never be convinced otherwise.
***It ended with me when zer0bama produced his CoLB online, for everyone to see. But...wait. IsraelInsider produced compelling evidence that it was a forgery. So did Polarik, et al. Maybe zer0bama should never have produced that forgery. Where will it end? Good question. A better question is: How does that further your point? You troll all over these threads and lately your posts have grown addlepated and schizophrenic, trolldrewd.
I think that’s enough evidence to put you on the CoLB troll List. I’d welcome you to FR, but you’re just a troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.