Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Anti Mullah Blog ^ | 1/11/09 | Tom Waite

Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN

I’m smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar theme—show proof you were born in the United States.

But now because just one of these ‘nuisance’ cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.

First, they’ve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral College’s votes) to discuss Berg’s writ of certiorari; the case can’t be dismissed—Berg will have legal standing!

And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes!

There’s no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially it’s a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesn’t comply by January 16th, the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; obamaillegal; obamanoncitizenissue; scotus; tinfoilalert; tinfoilhat; trolldeniers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-206 next last
To: Drew68
Where would it end with the conspiracy crowd? The people who want to believe that Obama isn't eligible to serve as President will never be convinced otherwise.

Just release the damn BC. Until that time no one will convince me otherwise that he is legit.

81 posted on 01/11/2009 11:39:49 AM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN
...the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

Absolute utter nonsense.

82 posted on 01/11/2009 11:43:59 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Tin foil or not, if a person who is elected President of the United States of America is not required to produce an original birth certificate, our justice system is broken beyond repair.

If the USSC does not respond to this, and require an original birth certificate of the elected person, as required by law, then what other more important requirements or laws are they willing to ignore?


83 posted on 01/11/2009 11:44:03 AM PST by airborne (My intention is to force radical debate. Islam, in it's<I current form,can not be allowed to persist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I think we should burn the constitution and then just do whatever the majority of voters want. Maybe we can vote for Hugo Chavez next time.


84 posted on 01/11/2009 11:51:45 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I have no idea what that means. I don’t see how stating the obvious makes me a troll.


85 posted on 01/11/2009 11:52:55 AM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: DE88
From what I can tell he feels he has already put an end to it from the earlier release of the BC on the web

What is it with you 0bama Trolls?

It wasn't a birth certificate.

It was a certificate of live birth. His sister has one too, and every one knows she was born in Indonesia.

Sheesh.

86 posted on 01/11/2009 11:54:34 AM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Just because they are lawyers does not mean they obey the law


87 posted on 01/11/2009 11:55:23 AM PST by al baby (Hi mom. not really just wanna get a bite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

I was making the point that that is what I THINK he thinks, as putting it to rest.

Berg et al. are barking up a tree. I’m sorry you are offended by that observation. Go ahead, send him your money.


88 posted on 01/11/2009 11:57:37 AM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: DE88; Kevmo; little jeremiah
I have no idea what that means.

Join the club. There's a lot of us on LJ's list. I dunno. Maybe there's gonna be a great Day of Reckoning or something? Who knows...

89 posted on 01/11/2009 11:58:50 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DE88

You’re just parroting the standard troll lines we see again & again, arguing from silence and other classical fallacies, ignoring substantive questions that throw your position into a harsh negative light. Standard troll stuff. That stuff is “stating the obvious” in trollville.


90 posted on 01/11/2009 11:59:59 AM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

one could hope...

Ah, such fond memories of the bugzapper thread when a bunch of RINO trolls committed freepercide. But, we digress. Back to your trolling.


91 posted on 01/11/2009 12:01:22 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

We’re well on our way to that. There are some who are more dangerous than Hugo Chavez.


92 posted on 01/11/2009 12:02:41 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

LOL! :D To be perfectly honest, I don’t care what it means. It seems people don’t like having their notions challenged. And God forbid if they are challenged you must be labled as some sort of traitor. Give me a damn break!

In case people don’t have the website http://www.obamacrimes.com/ Berg is seeking your funds. Please help the cause.


93 posted on 01/11/2009 12:03:33 PM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: DE88
You must be wrong about your thinking then....

He has made reference to the long form BC, but refuses to release it.

If the COLB put it to rest, there wouldn't be any court cases right now.

Even he knows this.

I stand by my accusation that you are an 0bama Troll.

94 posted on 01/11/2009 12:03:39 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

To me it is more of an amusement how people can be played by Berg on their hopes. Ring a bell?

You can stand by anything you wish, just please try not to stand next to me.


95 posted on 01/11/2009 12:06:58 PM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Ah, such fond memories of the bugzapper thread when a bunch of RINO trolls committed freepercide

When Jim wants to turn this forum --a forum that he's spent more than a decade building into a formidable internet voice for spreading conservatism, into Conspiracy Tin-Foil Republic, he's welcome to zot my account.

What's funny is I haven't even had as much as a single post removed by the mods. Every last post I've written in regards to this conspiracy is still standing. Can you say the same? Didn't think so.

96 posted on 01/11/2009 12:09:05 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Cheddar Cat

“I’m wondering that too...has any of this even happened?”

It really does not matter here in the Matrix.....


97 posted on 01/11/2009 12:09:46 PM PST by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and may have doomed us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Donofrio was denied cert because it limited the issue to intent of Founders re: NBC.

Berg hasn’t yet been granted because he did not have standing until the demorats foolishly rammed through bo’s certification in Congress. Now Congress has no jurisdiction over bo’s ineligibility. It is in the hands of the Supreme Court and Berg now has standing as do all the people harmed by bo’s fraud.

But perhaps the strongest cases are Lightfoot and Keyes. That is what the SC has been waiting for, the strongest case on which to rule.

If the SC does not find bo ineligible then the next round of Military cases will go to the SC. This will NOT end until bo is ruled ineligible to be POTUS. It is as simple as that.

Some ignorant obots have made a big deal about the fact that no case has been granted cert. herefofore. The ignorant obots talk about the Supremes scheduling cases for conference as a mere courtesy. NONSENSE! If the Supremes have been courteous it is to bo. They are giving him the chance to resign and not go to prison for countless crimes of dishonesty.


98 posted on 01/11/2009 12:13:03 PM PST by FreeManN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

The supremes take an oath too, are they supposed to just forget it and go with what ever Howdy Dowdy and the Mickey Mouse club say, just this one time??


99 posted on 01/11/2009 12:19:16 PM PST by Waco (The RATS said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DE88; Kevmo
To me it is more of an amusement how people can be played by Berg on their hopes. Ring a bell?

I am not a Bergite, or an Anti-Bergite.

This is about a man who would be POTUS, trained from the start in Chicago politics, hiding something that shouldn't need hiding.

An observant person with a sense of smell can always tell when there is a bad potato in the bag, and 0bama is a bad potato.

You either wish not to notice the smell, or you are bad too.

100 posted on 01/11/2009 12:23:45 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson