A Political Idea That Won't Go Away: Implications of Moral Law for America's Founding and Future

Heritage Foundation ^ | Jan. 13, 2009 | Greg Forster

[kc8ukw]

(At the link, click again for video or MP3.)

--

For centuries, the idea that human beings have an inherent sense of right and wrong has intrigued political and religious thinkers. The notion of a “natural” moral law has been a key driver of much Christian political thought in the west. It has helped shape the development of religious freedom and the concept of rights, and its influence on America’s Founding Fathers was fundamental.

In today’s post-modern society, however, the concept often prompts confusion and controversy. Even critics who might accept the reality of a moral law in theory wonder whether such an idea is outdated, impractical or unnecessary as a basis for liberal democracy.

Dr. Greg Forster, author of The Contested Public Square, provides clarity on this important topic. Forster will explain the ways the Founders relied on natural law as well as its continuing relevance for America’s future. Points of focus will include the way citizens debate justice and morality in the public square, how they resist tyranny and defend freedom, and the possibility of civil discourse in a pluralistic society.

[kc8ukw]

I found this to be an interesting speech for those of you with about 50 minutes to listen and in the mood for something a little intellectual. I think a lack of understanding about our proper relation to government and its proper role is one of the biggest failings of the American public today.

[screaminsunshine]

To the Obamans this is the new founding of a new country. It will not resemble the old America. Obamunism is the new rule. The king is in his court. Obama cometh.

[little jeremiah]

list?