Ravers!! 
14
16
Posted on 01/18/2009 9:09:11 AM PST by mainepatsfan
I see a stalemate because the Steelers just can’t move the ball consistently. The Cards have big play capability that the Steelers lack, so I see the Cards winning a low scoring game because of 3 or 4 big plays leading to FG/TDs.
What is with the video? It looks like it is being streamed over the internet.
Tightening up now.
Looks like this one might come down to the wire as well.
Ravers!! 14
16
It’s a lot sunnier in Arizona isn’t it??
Feel that gleam my FRiend.
I, OTOH, get to sweat this out, great!!!
Could be an exciting ending
What am I saying, it already is!
I’ve got happy feet...I’m either cuttin the rug or hi-fivin the ceilin
BTW The Cardinals - very happy they won. If any fans have paid their dues, it is those of that team.
The punters fault.
I hope...because it has been an error-filled boring game so far.
True enough
Fans are getting snippy....didn’t care for that play?
I’m smellin an upset
Could the Raving Lunatics actually come back and win this...um...game?
....in general if a guy doesn’t get to move under his own volition for more than a second or two they’ll call them down.
Uh-huh....except when that “second or two” is when they’re on the sidelines, or in the endzone which is only what I’ve been talking about all this time!
I think everyone realizes all this is very very subjective, except you!
Anyway....I’m gone....too old and tired to go any more.
Till next time!
I’ll stick with steelers 24 cards 10.
They’re in a perfect position to do so if they can burn the clock down and get into a chip shot FG range.
Well....the stillers look a little discombobulated. #78 just looks disinterested. Maybe they thought this game would be a blowout?
It’s not what you’ve been talking about this whole time. You talked about a defending grabbing a receiver before he touched the ground 10 yards from the sideline and carrying him out of bounds. Which is what I replied to. That’s not in the end zone.
I never said things weren’t subjective. But in the case of the Holmes non-catch things are very simple. He did not control the ball THROUGH contact with the ground, no catch, once it’s not a catch where it is in relation to the end zone line is immaterial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.