Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CE2949BB; wagglebee
Please: explain how the Republican party is supposed to win a nation-wide election in the 21st century when it rejects science. I'd love to know.

The Dems won the last nation wide election and you're not seriously implying that what they support is science, are you? All that global warming and environazi crap?

189 posted on 01/28/2009 6:40:29 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; All
The Dems won the last nation wide election and you're not seriously implying that what they support is science, are you? All that global warming and environazi crap?

Maybe you forgot how badly Sarah Palin was mocked - rightly or wrongly - for her supposed Creationist beliefs?

Whether or not she is a Creationist (that's open to debate), she was mocked and belittled for being a Creationist.

You can't expect the American people to elect a person to a position of power when they believe something that is rejected by mainstream science.

Same goes for climate change.

Instead of rejecting the reality of climate change, the debate should be on the political response.

It's impossible to have a voice in a political debate when you refuse to acknowledge the reality that led to the debate.

Sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming, "It's not science! Junk science! Make it go away!" doesn't address the problem and doesn't convince voters.

200 posted on 01/28/2009 6:51:24 PM PST by CE2949BB (Fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson