Replies

Maybe you forgot how badly Sarah Palin was mocked - rightly or wrongly - for her supposed Creationist beliefs? Whether or not she is a Creationist (that's open to debate), she was mocked and belittled for being a Creationist. You can't expect the American people to elect a person to a position of power when they believe something that is rejected by mainstream science. Same goes for climate change. Instead of rejecting the reality of climate change, the debate should be on the political response. It's impossible to have a voice in a political debate when you refuse to acknowledge the reality that led to the debate. Sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming, "It's not science! Junk science! Make it go away!" doesn't address the problem and doesn't convince voters.

I know why Sarah was mocked as the mocking MSM proudly proclaimed that the overwhelming majority of 40 and under COLLEGE educated crowd were Bama supporters. Animal Farm is reality, the most 'fittest to survive' are the ones more equal than the rest. Enjoy your victory.

Now the scientific methodology became precedence by the Supremes as only acceptable dogma in their houses of worship around 40 + years ago. And the taxpayer taking to fund your houses of worship has produced the perfect election. You all wanted God out of your means and methods and so you now have it, be happy.

The majority of Bama followers are NOW going to get to live under that scientific methodology.

And as Bama proclaimed you all would get back to 'real' science, most likely it will require 'hate crimes' legislation to punish and retrain anybody who knows and stands against a crack pot theory of primordial soup.

Kinda like Daniel getting tossed in the proverbial lions den.