Skip to comments.PHILIP BERG TO TALK ON MIKE SAVAGE SHOW
Posted on 02/24/2009 3:34:38 PM PST by spiderfern
Philip Berg next on Mike Savage show. CNN discounts any talk about birth certificate.
You said — “CNN discounts any talk about birth certificate.”
Ummm..., they’re not the only ones... I think the courts also “discounts any talk about birth certificate.” :-)
That’s why some of our own conservative media and posters have referred to it as the “Obama Derangement Syndrome”.
Of course, Phil Berg is no stranger to “derangement” by any means, considering that he has a case going, blaming our previous President George Bush as being involved in the 9/11 attack... LOL...
LOL! You guys really are concerned.
Stream here for interview:
Nah..., I just need some humor for the moment... :-)
Say..., talking about humor, and slightly off topic here’s something you’ll laugh at, and it’s good...
Problems Hitler had with his mortgage...
Also, Ballad of Bernie Madoff
You see..., you can laugh at some “problems” in this world, whether it’s the financial meltdown or Obama in office and the crazy ways some people “think” about getting him out of office... :-)
...Bravo, this is great, I love conspiracy theory...
Benedict Arnold was a true war hero, until he became a traitor. People are complex. Police often convict killers on the information from less than pure informants. Our intelligence agencies frequently use shady characters in order to advance the national good.
Yes, we should consider the source, when someone makes a statement. However, Berg is right on this one. We have a right to ask these questions.
The Courts have NEVER ruled that Obama is a Natural Born Citizen. NO Court, ever, has made such a ruling.
Mike doesn’t doubt him. He was amazed to hear about Obama’s college records sealed.
You said — “The Courts have NEVER ruled that Obama is a Natural Born Citizen. NO Court, ever, has made such a ruling.”
Yep, you’re right on that one... And, they are setting the precedent (in practice) that they never will...
It’s — now — up to the legislators to enact *laws* that require specific documentation for a candidate to be on the ballot. This is being done in Oklahoma and Arizona...
You said — “...Bravo, this is great, I love conspiracy theory...”
I absolutely love those conspiracy theories, too. They’re just so much fun... and provide all sorts of humor for me.
Of course, at the same time, I do provide *rational methods* for dealing with the “problems” that “conspiracists” raise — like getting states to enact laws to vet candidates (like Oklahoma and Arizona are doing).
But, even when posting “rational talk” — it’s always fun to venture into “conspiracies” as a pastime....
In Oklahoma, they made the birth certificate mandatory, for proving qualifictions, and it wasn’t just for the President, but for all candidates. The proposed legislation (according to the legislator) was to make sure that whomever is running for office is a citizen of this country. I would imagine, that for lower offices, that the wording of the bill would allow for naturalized citizens, too.
So, it’s not simply directed at Obama, but it’s also directed at *all candidates” for all offices.
Oklahoma also passed a law a year or two ago that caused a mass exodus of illegals out of the state...
House sends sweeping immigration reform bill to governors desk
By Tim Talley — Wednesday, May 2, 2007 5:01 PM CDT
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) Legislation described as the nations most sweeping attempt to deny jobs and public benefits to illegal immigrants was sent to Gov. Brad Henrys desk Tuesday.
State lawmakers urged Henry to sign the measure into law after it was approved in a bipartisan 84-14 vote by the state House. The bill was approved 41-6 by the Senate last month.
The people of Oklahoma are very strongly for this bill, said House Speaker Lance Cargill, R-Harrah.
Immigrant groups said the bill is a wrong-headed approach to stop illegal immigration and urged Henry to veto it.
Its not going to control immigration. Its going to create a long-term sour view in the Latino community, said Ed Romo, vice president of the League of United Latin American Citizens.
Its targeting the Latinos, the Hispanics, and nobody else, said Ed Madrid, state director of LULAC.
“Oklahoma also passed a law a year or two ago that caused a mass exodus of illegals out of the state...”
Which is probably why it voted so correctly last election.
You said — “Which is probably why it voted so correctly last election.”
Oh, that probably helped increase the margins, to be sure. But, Oklahoma was already very conservative, anyway — or else they would probably have never gotten that law passed in the first place...
I wouldn’t take it away from them, even if they did have a lot of illegals in their midst, in the past...
...Hope I wasn’t infering sarcasm, I take everything seriously these days, one issue at a time.
...Tonight, I’m celebrating, after 6 months not employed, I have a gig...
...Been trying to be reasonable and rational through these times of insanity, just glad to be economically viable again, and have a laugh...
True, it’s good to laugh at trouble and be glad when good fortune comes your way. Good luck on your gig...
It will get out sooner than later. Republicans including Shelby are starting to wake up. Keyes case will probably be the one that goes to SCOTUS.
If by "involved" you mean privy to the actual planning, no.
But one could conclude Bush & Co. were the cops who "looked the other way."
Then as now it remains incongruous that the World Trade Center could get hit twice by hijacked jets with known Islamo-terrorists aboard, as well as the Pentagon (200 miles away from NYC) WITHOUT confrontation by ANY U.S. Air Defense.
Curious that you find yourself as an apologist for 0bama by discrediting Berg's Birth Cert investigation and attributing it to a "Derangement Syndrome" a la Bush; That makes it a "Two-fer" for you.
Will you be bleating much during 0bama's speech this evening?
Perhaps the poster will trat us to one of her fractured bible lessons tonight! [ as in the Good Samaritan ]
You asked — “Will you be bleating much during 0bama’s speech this evening?”
Well, I don’t like listening to Obama. I refused to listen and/or watch his inauguration or listen to his speech and I won’t listen to him now, either.
However, I will read some reports about it and see what the analysis is....
[... no Obama for me... thank you... ]
Are you still trying to “get traction”... LOL..
I agree and think Keyes commands a lot of respect.
I'm not familiar with the referenced poster or her "fractured bible lessons," but "fractured lessons" seem to be a trend ;-)
As a post on another part of your statement — “Curious that you find yourself as an apologist for 0bama by discrediting Berg’s Birth Cert investigation and attributing it to a “Derangement Syndrome” a la Bush; That makes it a “Two-fer” for you.”
It’s only those with “Obama Derangement Syndrome” who think I’m an apologist for Obama. I didn’t vote for him and I won’t even listen to his speeches..., but will go over analysis of his positions and read reports on the position of the administration on issues.
I campaigned against Obama prior to the election and saw that I lost — I got outvoted by the Obama people...
So, afterwards, I saw that the way to stop Obama was to properly vet him through state laws to that effect, which is what is being done in Oklahoma and Arizona.
And the ones who continue to beat a dead horse over what a court of law will do nothing about, and especially since Obama is the President and it takes an Impeachment hearing to do anything about that — they’re the ones who think that anyone who doesn’t go for their “Obama Derangement Syndrome” is a supporter of Obama... :-)
I just see what “reality is” — and go for what works, hence the route of “state laws” for vetting candidates. And furthermore, working on changing results for the elections of 2010 and 2012...
However, I will read some reports about it and see what the analysis is...."
But please don't keep on believing in the Tooth Fairy. The Game IS rigged and has been since the guy on the left became President:
On the Berg issue, you said — “Then as now it remains incongruous that the World Trade Center could get hit twice by hijacked jets with known Islamo-terrorists aboard, as well as the Pentagon (200 miles away from NYC) WITHOUT confrontation by ANY U.S. Air Defense.”
Well, sorry, I’m not a “Phil Berg truther”... :-)
I don’t think Bush (”and company) had any knowledge that this attack was going to happen to us and the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Of course, there was already knowledge of an attempt out of the Philippines where closely similar was tried (but failed) But, there are lots of things, related to terrorists going on, all over the world. That’s why it’s been said it’s going to be impossible to stop the next big terrorist attack.
And, furthermore, when the attack did happen, I don’t think that there was any effort or any actions to impede US Air Defense from reacting to it.
If you’re a “Berg truther”... well..., so be it.. [it could explain your affinity for Berg and the Obama Derangement Syndrome, too...]
Sounds more conspiracy-minded than I am...
That’s about all I can say about it.
If you put chains on, you might get more traction... LOL...
It might help not being in the Obama Derangement Syndrome camp, too...
Is THAT all? LOL...Would that be those of us who believe Barry Hussein 0bama-Soetoro is a complete fraud?
"I campaigned against Obama prior to the election and saw that I lost I got outvoted by the Obama people...So, afterwards, I saw that the way to stop Obama was to properly vet him through state laws...
Your heart's in the right place, but you're surrendering your intellect to implausibilities. There is a time to be cynical. Bush allowed a tsunami-sized Mexican Illegal Invasion to go on unabated. 0bama was NEVER "vetted." PERIOD.
"The ones who continue to beat a dead horse over what a court of law will do nothing about, and especially since Obama is the President and it takes an Impeachment hearing to do anything about that...
So you've surrendered and expect others to do as well?
With all due respect, kindly get out of the way, madam. The Constitution must not be trampled upon any further; there are still many who shall NOT be deterred from the seeking the truth.
"I just see what 'reality is' and go for what works, hence the route of 'state laws' for vetting candidates."
No. You're a "pragmatist" - There's a huge difference. But don't worry - we'll chase down that horse that left the barn you gave up on.
Oye vey! Our globalist "moderate" friend has a severe case of RINO-itis. No wonder the GOP has been getting pummeled.
You said — “Is THAT all? LOL...Would that be those of us who believe Barry Hussein 0bama-Soetoro is a complete fraud?”
Well, under our particular system of justice, when someone is accused of being a fraud and there is legal action to be taken — it is customary to *prove it*.
The funny thing about this “prove it” (on behalf of the accuser...) is that the ones with Obama Derangement Syndrome think that the “crook” (according to them) must “prove that he is a crook” — in order for their case to be adjudicated... LOL..
And, there has been no court that has accepted anything in the way of proof that moves this case forward in order to remove Obama from office. That’s the failure of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people to prove their case. No court will move on the absence of anything that can prove the accusation of fraud.
Obviously many of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people don’t know much about the justice system... :-)
And that’s precisely why I say that the way to “vet a candidate” is by passing state laws requiring specific documentation for candidates, like Oklahoma and Arizona are doing.
You also said — “So you’ve surrendered and expect others to do as well?”
No, I’m working with my own legislator in Oklahoma for laws to properly vet a candidate with specified paperwork...