Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Pope opposes condoms
news.bbc ^ | Wednesday, 18 March 2009

Posted on 03/18/2009 8:11:16 PM PDT by JoeProBono

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Hieronymus

Hmmmmm... I will ponder what you’ve written here at length — thanks for that, I appreciate it. I enjoy John Paul II’s writing (he was a prolific writer) and confess that I haven’t read that book yet. I’ll see if it is at my local library.

I an readily understand and accept that contraception between unmarried couples is wrong because sex between unmarried couples is wrong. I struggle, tho’, with why it should also be wrong for committed, married couples, where there is not a desire to avoid conception entirely — just maybe not as often and not at the moment. Practise does, after all, make perfect...


21 posted on 03/19/2009 3:13:36 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sometime lurker

Let’s not get technical... it’s just an old joke that made me laffmy nutzoff the first time I heard it


22 posted on 03/19/2009 3:21:17 AM PDT by Mr. K (physically unable to proofreed (<---oops))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
Same reason it's proscribed for singles. Because it's bad for the marriage - and - in the case of the pill - bad for a woman's health.

The Church supports and teachers natural family planning - it is as or more effective than the pill or any barrier method. And unlike those other methods, it requires a monogamous couple to pay more attention to each others' bodies, not less.

What I like most about being a Catholic is that you can divine the Church's teachings without reference to ancient texts or one person's speech, but instead with the simple application of reason to nature. Everything becomes so clear and simple.

23 posted on 03/19/2009 2:31:16 PM PDT by mbraynard (You are the Republican Party. See you at the precinct meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“It’s in the job description.”

I would be interested in seeing that job description. And who actually wrote it?


24 posted on 03/20/2009 3:09:51 PM PDT by toomanylaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: toomanylaws
And who actually wrote it?

God in three Persons, Blessed Trinity.

25 posted on 03/20/2009 6:58:27 PM PDT by Petronski (For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson