Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USDOJ: Office of Solicitor General AND SCOTUS! (re: Taitz, Obama lawsuit)
Defend Our Freedoms ^ | 3/24/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 03/24/2009 12:41:30 PM PDT by rxsid

USDOJ: Office of Solicitor General AND SCOTUS!

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. just received a phone call from Karen Thornton at the Department of Justice. She stated that all of Orly's documents and filings have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General, Elena Kagan. That includes all three Dossiers, the Quo Warranto Easterling v. Obama aka Soetoro. Please show your support that we want these matters and investigations looked into immediately, 202-514-2203.

Coincidently, after Dr. Taitz called me with that update, she received another call from Officer Giaccino at the Supreme Court. Officer Giaccino stated both pleadings have been received and being analyzed now. Also, Justice Roberts must be back because the Officer also stated that all the documents that were given to Chief Justice Roberts at Iowan University are now at the Supreme Court and are also being analyzed. We will be notified tomorrow after 1:00pm EST as to whether they will be on the docket at the Supreme Court.

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/24/usdoj--office-of-solicitor-general-and-scotus.aspx


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bctrollsarescared; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; bhodoj; birthcertificate; birtherrebirth; birthers; british; certifigate; citizenship; colb; constitution; coverup; democrats; democratscandals; donofrio; doublestandard; eligibility; hawaii; ineligible; kenya; lightfoot; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; orly; orlytaitz; scotus; taitz; tinfoilhatalert; truthers; uslurplers; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-154 next last
To: Red Steel
A former Clinton administration lawyer who’s been the dean of Harvard Law School since 2003, Kagan is seen as a possible Obama nominee for any future opening on the high court.”

If this heats up, we can destroy her chances of confirmation. Have at her, Freepers!

101 posted on 03/24/2009 4:33:53 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Habibi
I agree. The window is opening. Biden has been talking trash against Obama in public. Hillary is nowhere to be found in the media. The State Dept. has allowed some HUGE gaffs to drop in Obama's lap, Congress is in a panic over the next election as poll numbers are cratering even for safe Democrat seats. Obama is all over TV making a fool of himself, the markets have crumbled (notwithstanding yesterday's bear rally), the Fed has just devalued the dollar and the establishment is backing away from Obama because Obama is planning to tax them into middle class status.

If the SCOTUS takes the case, watch the ducks line up behind Biden real fast and watch Hillary line up as VP to checkmate the National Lunatic Pelosi. This could make some fascinating television, folks!

102 posted on 03/24/2009 4:43:35 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
No, you responded to 45, that is me.

My initial response was to post #28. Then you questioned that response and we went back and forth and we're where we're at now. Understand? Sheesh.

103 posted on 03/24/2009 4:46:15 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
" But what does it tell? That he's ineligible to be POTUS, or that his BC contains some embarrassing information? My money is on the latter. Is his name different than thought? What if his birth name is "Barry?" Is his father different than thought? What if Mr. Marshall is his dad? Perhaps his name really is "Barry Soetero." If that is the case (re different info on his actual BC), then could he be charged with altering a government document? Why did he (his campaign) post a known forgery on his site then? If his name is really something different...then he set himself up for election fraud because he signed BHO on all his election documents. Not to mention his Illinois state bar app, he stated he's never been known by any other name. He then gets removed for the various frauds committed.

It is hard to believe he's spend $1.5 million to keep America from knowing his father might be an American Communist/racist agitator from the 1960's. But... its hard to believe Obama on a good day. We need to see his file...

104 posted on 03/24/2009 4:48:24 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Bump Dat...


105 posted on 03/24/2009 4:59:24 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

THanks, I have been very busy and unable to read much on FR - will hopefully have time tonight. I always appreciate being alerted.


106 posted on 03/24/2009 5:06:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: earlJam
Yep, confirmed just last week.:

03-19) 14:48 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

The Senate has confirmed the nation's first female solicitor general to represent the United States before the Supreme Court.

Lawmakers approved Harvard Law School Dean Elena Kagan by a vote of 61 to 31.

She and President Barack Obama taught at the University of Chicago Law School during the 1990s.

The 48-year-old Kagan has never argued a Supreme Court case, but she clerked for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. She also worked in the Clinton White House as an associate counsel and policy adviser.

Doesn't sound like the sort of person that is going to help in any way in any attempt to get at whatever the truth might be about The One.

107 posted on 03/24/2009 5:23:09 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Yeah, I understand that you don’t know how to follow a thread.


108 posted on 03/24/2009 5:36:12 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Thanks for posting this. Verrry interesting.


109 posted on 03/24/2009 5:45:54 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarah p

Do not be a defeatist. If you want to be hopeless, I would advise doing so in private. People who give up before the victory of defeat has occurred only demoralize those who have the stomach to fight for the right cause.


110 posted on 03/24/2009 5:48:17 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Perhaps you’d care to explain what was wrong with my description of events.


111 posted on 03/24/2009 6:00:41 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks for the good news ping Nully.


112 posted on 03/24/2009 6:31:54 PM PDT by Oorang (Tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bttt


113 posted on 03/24/2009 6:34:17 PM PDT by 1035rep ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

No, I have no time to teach you about posting and responding to posts. Nor do I care to if I had time.


114 posted on 03/24/2009 6:41:56 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Way to go guys and gals!

Keep on it. Don’t listen to the naysayers. Ignore them.

Something stinks to high heaven about this whole thing.

If anyone has a birther ping list, please add me to it.


115 posted on 03/24/2009 6:56:30 PM PDT by Envisioning ("....The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by........(you know the rest)")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bump de bump.


116 posted on 03/24/2009 7:24:57 PM PDT by ken21 (the only thing we have to fear is fdr deja vu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246
I don't think you read my post before you responded. Your comment makes no sense to what I have posted.

The document Orly gave Scalia, via his security, was his copy of a dossier. She didn't file the Lightfoot v. Bowen with him. That was when she went to Idaho to see Roberts.

Roberts documents came back to SCOTUS today and are being analyzed.

117 posted on 03/24/2009 7:31:49 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks.


118 posted on 03/24/2009 7:32:33 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Sheesh - Before victory OR defeat has occurred...

(I have to preview.)


119 posted on 03/24/2009 7:43:13 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: All
PING!

"Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq and Senator Jon Kyl

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. will be meeting with Senator Jon Kyl tomorrow at 12:00pm EST. This was one of the meetings requested in the Letter sent out to the Senators and Congressmen on February 11, 2009.

Dr. Taitz yesterday learned this letter was also not on record.

Senator Kyl is currently the Senate Minority Whip and serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Thank you Senator Kyl!"

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/24/dr-orly-taitz-esq-and-senator-jon-kyl.aspx

120 posted on 03/24/2009 8:11:44 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

This sounds good.


121 posted on 03/24/2009 9:09:20 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Excellent news.


122 posted on 03/24/2009 9:17:48 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I won’t get in the way of anyone who wants to move this forward either! I was just saying that it is unlikely that Kagan will be on our side here. It just seems like Obama has his cronies everywhere and that they are continuing to jerk us around.

I admire the work that Dr. Taitz is doing and I hope that I am wrong about Kagan.


123 posted on 03/24/2009 9:23:40 PM PDT by sarah p
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I am not being a defeatist and I will never give up until this issue is resolved.

I do not want to get my hopes up on Kagan doing anything because she has ties to Obama.

On the positive side, I am sure that Dr. Taitz is not just sitting around waiting for them to help us. She has shown time and again that she will find multiple ways to expose Obama’s lack of natural-born status.

I DO remain optimistic that Obama will eventually be exposed as the fraud that he is.


124 posted on 03/24/2009 9:35:27 PM PDT by sarah p
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Yeah, that’s about what I figured. Run away.


125 posted on 03/24/2009 10:04:56 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sarah p

I won’t get in the way of anyone who wants to move this forward either!
***I hope you didn’t think I was hinting at that. I’m just frustrated with others, mainly CoLB trolls who are allowed to openly operate here on FR, and the scoffers alongside them.


126 posted on 03/25/2009 12:00:38 AM PDT by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

BTTT


127 posted on 03/25/2009 4:21:52 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

Oh mercy...

If THE ONE is removed from office, that means Joe Biden will become our President.

Talk about an intellectual lightweight...

To borrow a phrase from the Mogambo Guru:

“WE’RE FREAKING DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!”


128 posted on 03/25/2009 4:47:51 AM PDT by DivaDelMar (CRAm member-- (Conservative Republicans Against mcCain) Think you're entitled to my vote? CRAm It!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“Give it time the moment is gaining strength. I give Obama 12 months max. People will be climbing all over the band wagon looking for an excuse to get rid of the Obama presidency.”

I wish I could be as optimistic as you are. I didn’t think anyone in their right mind would vote for the TOTUS, either. :(


129 posted on 03/25/2009 4:55:55 AM PDT by GWMcClintock ("When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" Ps. 11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“Give it time the moment is gaining strength. I give Obama 12 months max. People will be climbing all over the band wagon looking for an excuse to get rid of the Obama presidency.”

I wish I could be as optimistic as you are. I didn’t think anyone in their right mind would vote for the TOTUS, either. :(


130 posted on 03/25/2009 4:56:09 AM PDT by GWMcClintock ("When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" Ps. 11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Can someone please explain to me what sets this case apart from the others that have been summarily dismissed by SCOTUS?


131 posted on 03/25/2009 5:03:03 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; BIGLOOK; Polarik; LucyT; SE Mom; STARWISE; Fred Nerks; Enchante; pissant; null and void

“Biden’s ‘joke’ was pure elitist in-your-face arrogance, in effect saying ‘we won, and we will do as we please while these idiots scurry about trying to catch us.”

It could be that. Also, it could be a show of arrogance against Oboz0. Maybe it was a veiled threat to Oboz0, “I have a the real scoop on your birth certificate! So you will let me have what ever I want!”

Many of us wondered why Oboz0 picked another narcistic bastard like himself to be his VP.

Maybe Joe had the goods on Oboz0 and blackmailed him to become his VP.


132 posted on 03/25/2009 6:03:01 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, or tax evaders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
>>>>Can someone please explain to me what sets this case apart from the others that have been summarily dismissed by SCOTUS?

None of those cases were heard. It was an internet show with the external docket showing one thing while the internal docket showed otherwise.

http://defendourfreedoms.org/Dossier3.htm

133 posted on 03/25/2009 6:03:25 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: sarah p

>>>I am sure that Dr. Taitz is not just sitting around waiting for them to help us.

You are correct. She is meeting with Senator Kyl this afternoon.


134 posted on 03/25/2009 6:06:18 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

But this one may not be heard, either, correct? Just because there is confirmation they have recived the filings, does not mean the court will hear it.


135 posted on 03/25/2009 6:19:18 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Joe’s son had Larry Sinclair in lockup for a spell in Delemare. Perhaps Larry was scared enought o offer a few leads for further dope on Obozo. But that would have been swept by now, with Obozo’s ‘retired’ CIA men.


136 posted on 03/25/2009 6:27:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

I don’t think you understand what I said. Clerks and such falsified court actions and forged justices signatures. Try reading the link I added in my post.


137 posted on 03/25/2009 6:29:07 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; BIGLOOK; Beckwith

“Joe’s son had Larry Sinclair in lockup for a spell in Delemare. Perhaps Larry was scared enough to offer a few leads for further dope on Obozo. But that would have been swept by now, with Obozo’s ‘retired’ CIA men.”

Thanks, I had forgot about that event.

The odds are pretty good that our military intel guys/gals know the bottom line on Barry’s birthing situation. There would be no way that SECDEF Gates would have stayed on if there wasn’t prior knowledge of Oboz0’s birthing situation.


138 posted on 03/25/2009 7:03:30 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, or tax evaders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: sarah p

Sorry for being so extremist and jumping all over your comment!! I now see you were referring to Kagan and not the issue in general. I agree that any puppet installed by 0bama is basically a henchman and certainly will do his bidding, not answer the call of Justice. My apologies.


139 posted on 03/25/2009 8:09:37 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Regarding the Solicitor General Kagan. The documents, according to Dr. Taitz's site, were submitted to the DOJ and then forwarded to the S.G. Kagan's office.

Quote: "Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. just received a phone call from Karen Thornton at the Department of Justice. She stated that all of Orly's documents and filings have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General, Elena Kagan. "

This should be expected. Why? Because the S.G. would represent Barry from the Govt's perspective, if the case where to be heard at SCOTUS. Of course, he would have his team of personal lawyers as well.

So after the docs where subbmited to the DOJ, Dr Taitz's office was informed (apparently) that the docs were forwarded to the S.G.

"The original Statutory Authorization Act of June 22, 1870, states, "There shall be in the Department of Justice an officer learned in the law, to assist the Attorney General in the performance of his duties to be called the Solicitor General." The Office of the Solicitor General is tasked to conduct all litigation on behalf of the United States in the Supreme Court, and to supervise the handling of litigation in the federal appellate courts. The general functions of the Office can be found at 28 CFR 0.20."
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/

140 posted on 03/25/2009 9:51:46 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

place marker


141 posted on 03/25/2009 9:58:57 AM PDT by upcountry miss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: pickyourpoison

bookmark


142 posted on 03/25/2009 10:28:22 AM PDT by pickyourpoison (" Laus Deo ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Oh, please.

Orly is merely showing her ignorance of how the Supreme Court works. As I pointed out at the time her cases were calendared for conference before the Supreme Court-- and got flamed for doing so-- the fact that a case is listed for conference doesn't mean it actually gets discussed. Every case filed with the Supreme Court gets listed for conference. That means dozens and dozens of cases are listed for conference on the same day. (Check the Supreme Court's on-line docket and you will see.) Before the conference, each Justice circulates a list (not made public) of which cases they want to discuss. Any case not put on the "discuss list" by any Justice is never discussed and is denied automatically, even though it was listed for conference.

So it is no wonder that Justices don't seem to remember Orly's cases-- all were denied without a single recorded dissent, which means they most likely were not discussed. (Again, I pointed this out on FR at the time, and got flamed for saying so.)

Even if a case had been discussed in conference, the Justices would never discuss it in public.

So when Orly is making wild claims that the Justices' signatures were forged on the orders denying her cases, just because they don't remember those cases, she is only hurting her credibility with the Court for her next filing.

143 posted on 03/25/2009 12:37:20 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Lurking Libertarian. I remember you.

Nice try.


144 posted on 03/25/2009 12:49:31 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
She stated that all of Orly's documents and filings have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General, Elena Kagan...

...who will promptly throw them into the waste basket. LOL.

It amuses me how much birthers read into meaningless bits of news, trying to latch on to the smallest morsel of hope they can find. LOL.

145 posted on 03/25/2009 1:05:51 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
It would be to her (Kagan's) detriment then. LOL. As she (Kagan) would be representing the Government if a case were to be heard by SCOTUS. To toss them would be incredibly foolish IMO.

What amazes me is that OBOTS and fellow Usplurpler's (someone who drinks the kool-aid given out by the Usurper) continue to lick the boots of their false messiah.

Have a nice day. LOL

146 posted on 03/25/2009 1:42:05 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
It amuses me how much birthers read into meaningless bits of news, trying to latch on to the smallest morsel of hope they can find. LOL.

I'm waiting to hear a report on Orly's meeting with Kyl. That should be entertaining.

147 posted on 03/25/2009 1:48:36 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: All
[Quote]
Meeting with the National Director of the Selective Service William Chatfield

attn Eric Holder-attorney General
Elena Kagan-Solicitor General,
Department of Justice
Robert Mueller-Director of FBI
Mark sullivan-Director of US Secret Service

Today, on 03.25.09. at 10:15 I have met with the National director of the Selective Service William Chatfield in his office at 1515 Wilson Blvd, ste 600 in Arlington VA. I have presented to Mr. Chatfield a report by the retired Federal Agent Steven Coffman, showing that Barack Obama's Certification for Selective Service has numerous signs of forgery.
Mr. Chatfield provided no explanation to the findings. I have asked, what is the explanation to the fact that the serial number on the top right of the page, that usually shows the year, showed 08, meaning that it was created in 2008 and under the card an 8 was added before the number to make it look 80, as if it was issued in 1980. According to agent Coffman it was forged to backdate it, to look as if it was issued in 1980. Mr. Chatfield had no explanation. Similarly I have questioned him about the wrong stamp, wrong form number and wrong dates (see the report in dossier #1).
No answer and no information was provided. I have left the dossier with Mr. Chatfield and reiterated other troubling issues, such as a list of 100 addresses with numerous social security numbers for Mr. Obama, I demand immediate investigation of this matter.

Sincerely
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
949-683-5411
[End Quote]

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/25/dossier-4-meeting-national-director-of-selective-service-william-chatfield.aspx

148 posted on 03/25/2009 1:50:44 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please .. oh please!


149 posted on 03/25/2009 8:03:30 PM PDT by RocketMan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
I think that was Justice Scalia.

Yes, it was Scalia that she met with. Not Roberts.

150 posted on 03/25/2009 8:05:58 PM PDT by RocketMan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson