Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed solar plant runs into obstacles
Valley Press ^ | Thursday, April 16, 2009. | ALLISON GATLIN

Posted on 04/16/2009 12:48:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin

CALIFORNIA CITY - A 250-megawatt solar power plant proposed for a former agricultural site north of the city has run into obstacles in the state permitting process. The company's plan to use fresh groundwater to cool the plant goes against state policy, so at a Tuesday public workshop representatives of the California Energy Commission outlined a series of alternatives that would not rely on fresh groundwater. However, the power plant operator argued that those alternatives are not feasible.

Beacon Solar LLC, a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources LLC, has applied to the state to construct and operate the solar plant on some 2,000 acres of land off State Route 14 about four miles north-northwest of California City and west of Cantil.

The plant would use a series of curved mirrors to capture and reflect sunlight on a series of tubes. Liquids in the tubes would be heated by the sunlight and in turn used to power a steam turbine, which actually produces the electricity.

The power plant application falls under the state Energy Commission's "in lieu" permitting process, which combines the various permits required from local, state and federal agencies into one process.

Tuesday's workshop addressed the various aspects of the commission's preliminary staff assessment, including air quality issues and cultural, biological, soil and water resources, as well as the commission staff's alternatives to the plan as proposed.

NextEra Energy was able to respond to the issues raised by staff in the preliminary assessment, and in many cases the two parties were able to agree on clarifications and other measures.

On the use of 1,600 acre-feet of groundwater for the plant, however, the commission and the company found little room for agreement.

(Excerpt) Read more at avpress.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/16/2009 12:48:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

California is lost. I gotta move out of here!


2 posted on 04/16/2009 12:53:38 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The 1,600 acre-feet per year of groundwater the solar plant would use is far less than the site's previous use as an alfalfa farm, he said, and the effect on groundwater levels would not be significant.

So, the issue is not water but something else.

3 posted on 04/16/2009 1:06:54 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48; neverdem; Cyber Liberty; sionnsar; patton; MHGinTN; xcamel; Reform Canada
I will merely point out that a 100% reliable, 100% CAPABLE, day-and-night 360 Megwatt combined cycle power plant was recently built in Massachusetts ..... on less than 3-1/2 acres of land.

Using waste water from the nearby municipal sewage system for cooling.

Oh. By the way. Total cost of the 362 Meg, 24-hour-per-day plant was about 220 million in 2005.


The plant also had to meet environmental concerns by setting aside land, with a ‘special permitting’ use for wastewater effluent. This effluent comes from a nearby wastewater treatment plant and is used for wet cooling.

AWARD FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

The plant uses secondary treated wastewater from the Town of Southbridge’s municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Factors complicating this wastewater reuse were regulatory acceptance, distance between the WWTP and the power plant, crossing of environmental resources and a steep slope within the project site.

Weston & Sampson performed an initial assessment of cooling water need, wastewater quality and tertiary treatment. It then made a facilities layout and pipeline routing study along with final design and construction.

The wastewater reuse system provides up to 2.75 million gallons per day of cooling water to the power plant. Treated effluent, supplemented seasonally with water from the Quinebaug River, provides cooling water on a continuous basis. Cooling water waste is returned to the WWTP to be treated and reused. The sustainable system mitigates environmental impacts to local water resources, and a financial resource to Southbridge.


In addition to wasting water in the desert, this “solar” power “plant” can only produce power on sunny days between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm. With peak power only available between 10:30 and 1:30 solar time.

4 posted on 04/16/2009 1:08:21 PM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Ayep - interesting, about the NE plant. Yours?


5 posted on 04/16/2009 1:27:19 PM PDT by patton (I hope that they fight to the death and both sides win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

thanks, bfl


6 posted on 04/16/2009 7:08:23 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

What does this power plant use for fuel? Do you have a reference. I imagine it’s a conventional power plant.


7 posted on 04/16/2009 10:20:19 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
The Mass “real” power plant uses natural gas for fuel: The combustion turbine burns that gas, then the high temperature exhaust gasses from the 260 MegWatt CT pass through a boiler to create “free” (no cost) steam that runs to the 120 MegWatt steam turbine - which turns a second generator.

The municipal water is used to cool the condensate from the steam turbine.

8 posted on 04/17/2009 6:09:19 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
...turbine burns that gas, then the high temperature exhaust gasses from the 260 MegWatt CT pass through a boiler to create “free” (no cost)...

They get the gas for free? How is it "no cost"?

9 posted on 04/17/2009 1:20:43 PM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson