Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Now here are a few questions I have?

1)Why would Pakistani Officials now risk all war especially the military with their former allies after all this time, unless there was a major risk involved to Pakistan's survival?

2)Why would the Times of India report such a story? What does India have to gain as it is a nuclear power itself and has no love for the Taliban?

3)Why would officials in the Obama White House all of a sudden use FoxNews to report on a plan to have Special Forces secure Pakistan's Nuclear Arsenal, when the main stream press hangs on Obama's every word and these same officials have nothing but apathy for FoxNews.

4)Notice how Obama has taken steps with his allies in Congress to slow down the closing of Gitmo as late and Eric Holder has stated the Former Bush position that terrorist suspect have no POW Rights.

5)Lastly, I believe that the reason why Obama is allowing the military commission that he once preached against now stand(in the last two weeks)is because could one curtain the public outrage and outcry from the American Public if it became public that Bin Laden, Al-Qeade or the Taliban now had nuclear weapons, military commission are and can be closed to public and all officers and enlisted can be forced to take an oath of silence by the President.

1 posted on 05/17/2009 10:42:39 PM PDT by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Trueblackman

They’d probably give it Iran...the best choice of an Islamic country with nuke know how. IMO.


2 posted on 05/17/2009 10:46:01 PM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trueblackman

All I know is radicals getting their hands on even one nuke is pretty much the sum of all fears.

One can only hope they detonate it on themselves in some cave while trying to figure out how to work the thing.


3 posted on 05/17/2009 10:47:23 PM PDT by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trueblackman
( Could the Taliban or Al-Qaede in Pakistan already have one or more of Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons? )

Mr. Obama's broken arrow.....

yes, this scenario ( scenario or not ) would not surprise me at all and there very well could be nukes on the lose.
5 posted on 05/17/2009 10:49:37 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trueblackman

Nukes aren’t something to keep around forever like a sealed can of .223 ammo. Truly, nukes need a clean lab, experienced technicians, and very special handling/maintenance.

Pakis are pretty clever people, but even there the population capable of maintaining nukes out in the field is miniscule...and the costs are very high.

Plus, detonating just one nuke will open most of SE Asia and the Middle East to a widespread nuclear retaliation.

Moreover, Pakistan fears India. India could take a nuke detonation and not even miss 5 million people out of its 1.1 Billion. India would then roll over Pakistan and the genocide/ethnic cleansing would be unparalleled.

In fact, Pakistan losing control of its nukes would likely cause an invasion from India that would conquer Pakistan and end the anarchy of the tribal border lands.

Faced with nuclear armed India as its neighbor, Pakistanis who hate Israel and the U.S. have a very different reality with which to contend.

So for practical, technical, tactical, and strategic reasons, Al qaeda is unlikely to detonate a nuke. Such a detonation would almost have to be state-sanctioned by Pakistan, North Korea, Russia, Iran, or China...none of which have the missile defenses required to stop the inevitable retaliation.


6 posted on 05/17/2009 10:51:58 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trueblackman
Interesting ideas. I'm not sold on them. If we actually thought that a nuclear weapon had been stolen and it was able to be recovered we would not leave that chore to a second rate military. We would go after it ourselves.
Even Obama would get on-board with that mission. We are not hearing anything about US military personnel being involved so it doesn't meet the smell test, yet.
7 posted on 05/17/2009 10:52:38 PM PDT by oldenuff2no (I'm a VET and damn proud of it!!! I did not fight for a socialist America!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
JIHAD WATCH.org (THE TIMES OF INDIA): Washington - "INDIA: PAKISTAN'S NUKES 'ALREADY PARTLY' IN THE HANDS OF JIHADIS" (May 16, 2009) (Read More...)

10 posted on 05/17/2009 11:03:39 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson