Skip to comments.
Obama Signs Landmark Anti-Smoking Bill
www.foxnews.com ^
Posted on 06/22/2009 12:46:41 PM PDT by Mind Freed
President Obama on Monday signed a landmark anti-smoking bill which he said will reduce the number of children who take up smoking and ultimately save American lives.
The bill would give the federal government unprecedented authority to regulate tobacco. The law allows the regulatory Food and Drug Administration to reduce nicotine in tobacco products, ban candy flavorings and block labels such "low tar" and "light." Tobacco companies also will be required to cover their cartons with large graphic warnings.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bho44; cigarettes; lping; nannystate; obama; smokingban
I didn't see this anywhere yet on Free Republic. If I missed it somewhere and it's a double or triple post... My apologies...
To: Mind Freed
Another chip from the tree of liberty gone.
2
posted on
06/22/2009 12:48:17 PM PDT
by
jtal
To: Mind Freed
The double post police will let you know if you have sinned. But that aside, the words “President Obama” make me want to hurl.
3
posted on
06/22/2009 12:49:08 PM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Please God Save The United States From The Democrats, and Barack Hussein Obama. Amen.)
To: jtal
Too much longer and there won’t be a tree to water
4
posted on
06/22/2009 12:50:03 PM PDT
by
Domandred
(Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
To: Mind Freed
What if I, as an adult, WANT to smoke a candy-flavored light low-tar cigarette?
5
posted on
06/22/2009 12:51:07 PM PDT
by
ElectricStrawberry
(27th Infantry Regiment....cut in half during the Clinton years...)
To: Mind Freed
To: Mind Freed
7
posted on
06/22/2009 12:55:19 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
excerpt...
Nicotine is the only reason a tobacco consumer consumes tobacco. Aside from the comforting rituals of buying, unwrapping, prepping, fondling, lighting and gesturing with ones chosen tobacco product, the ultimate purpose of tobacco consumption is the delivery of nicotine to the receptors on specialized brain cells inside the tobacco consumers skull. Its not a big sin; the consumption of nicotine by itself is rather harmless. By itself, nicotine is no more harmful than the caffeine we offer children with every can of Coke or Mountain Dew; it does no harm to the God-given temple of our bodies. Its all the other useless crap in the smoke that causes asthma attacks and heart disease and makes people cough up those gigantic yellow loogies. So youd think that anyone who invented an smokeless, odor-free, way to provide nicotine junkies with a quick fix without endangering anyones health would be instantly hailed as a genius, a benefactor of mankind and an all-round good Joe. Well, if you think that, then you dont understand politicians.
8
posted on
06/22/2009 12:58:51 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: jtal
I have a honey flavored cigar every once in a while. Maybe I should stock up today!!!
9
posted on
06/22/2009 1:03:55 PM PDT
by
seamusnh
To: paterfamilias
Not a single person from the press has asked Gibbs or Obama why he is pushing to limit smoking when the entire funding for SCHIP is dependent upon a massive increase in smoking. Just words....just speeches.
10
posted on
06/22/2009 1:05:15 PM PDT
by
GOPyouth
(Obama's against running GM, except when he's not.)
To: Mind Freed
What’s the point??? Politicians have been passing all these anti-smoking laws since the 60s, but people still smoke.
The confusing message they send is they also have smokers footing a lot of what passes for various government healthcare plans today.
So, do they want smokers to pay for other people’s healthcare, or do they REALLY want to end smoking???
I’m confused!!
11
posted on
06/22/2009 1:08:32 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Mind Freed
I suppose now they'll legalize marijuana so they can tax it. Gubmint needs the money.
12
posted on
06/22/2009 1:10:44 PM PDT
by
Need4Truth
(Washington DC is a foreign entity.)
To: Mind Freed
He's just given his Muzzie buddies an unprecedented opportunity to fund terrorism by raising the profit potential to bootleg tobacco. It isn't that hard to do: set up a sham wholesaler to buy product from willing sellers, roll them in a warehouse somewhere and ship them out to willing buyers minus the tax.
If you thought the war on drugs was a failure, just wait until you see the war on bootleg tobacco!
13
posted on
06/22/2009 1:20:11 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Vigilanteman
If that North Korean ship was carrying tobacco or cigarettes we would be sure to intercept it. Unfortunately it’s only carrying weapons for terrorists...
14
posted on
06/22/2009 1:22:56 PM PDT
by
Russ
(Repeal the 17th amendment)
To: Russ
I’m not so sure. Muzzies are already moving massive amounts of cigarettes from North Carolina to the Detroit area and our glorious government turns a blind eye. Talk to any trucker who works the Carolinas and Virginia regularly and they’ll tell you.
15
posted on
06/22/2009 1:32:20 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Mind Freed
I didn’t pay any attention to Obama’s announcement today, but I wonder if he is going after the movie industry, probably the biggest promoter of cigarettes in the world today. Somehow, I doubt it.
To: Mind Freed
Children are already banned from buying cigarettes, so how will this reduce children’s smoking? Because we take away their freedom to pretend to smoke by banning candy cigarettes?
Suppose I buy some candy cigarettes for my children. Who goes to jail, me or the kids? And for how long?
I wish I had bought some before he signed the bill.
I guess we just put more people out of work at the candy cigarette manufacturing plant.
To: bamahead; Eric Blair 2084
18
posted on
06/22/2009 1:45:11 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Mind Freed
What with the way the media and the masses worship the guy, he’d get along further by publicly giving up smoking himself and making a big issue of it and challenging others to follow his example.
It’d be cheaper in the long run, too.
19
posted on
06/22/2009 1:46:51 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
20
posted on
06/22/2009 3:05:15 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: bamahead
One more straw on the camel's back and the load continues to grow.
21
posted on
06/22/2009 3:11:27 PM PDT
by
Landru
(Arghh, Liberals are trapped in my colon like spackle or paste.)
To: Mind Freed
Doesn’t he smoke? i saw this earlier on Fox News and they were saying how he has a lot of nerve lecturing others about smoking when he is a smoker.
http://thefunemployed.blogspot.com/
22
posted on
06/22/2009 3:51:27 PM PDT
by
Rance
To: CharlesWayneCT
They’re also gonna ban lollipops, pens, pencils, and any other objects that children could use to simulate smoking.
To: petitfour
Once my son pointed his arm at another student and said “bang”, so they cut it off.
:-)
To: Mind Freed
We may have a few people addicted to tobacco in this country, but we have a lot more addicted to government intervention in every aspect of our daily lives.
We should have some kind of law against that.
25
posted on
06/22/2009 8:20:58 PM PDT
by
elkfersupper
(Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: CharlesWayneCT
LOL
(or is that inappropriate humor?) Well, LOL anyway. LOL
To: Mind Freed
"The agency will be able to prohibit marketing campaigns, especially those geared toward children."
What marketing campaigns has anyone seen or heard that are geared toward children?
Notice how everything totalitarian the dictators of the Left impose on us is done under the guise of "it's for the chillun".
Filthy liars....including Obama.
And the sheeple fall for it, hook, line and stinker.
Leni
27
posted on
06/22/2009 8:39:32 PM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(Please Don't Tell Obama What Comes After a Trillion!)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Not candy cigarettes, real cigarettes with candy or fruit flavoring.
28
posted on
06/22/2009 10:22:13 PM PDT
by
Impy
(RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
To: Mind Freed
Anybody in my age range, mid fifties, remember when you could buy Chocolate Cigarettes? As I recall, they were really yummy. Used to like those Bubble Gum Cigars as well.
Had those when I was a kid and I don't smoke. I used to have alot of toy guns as a kid, but I haven't shot anyone yet.
The population of today's United States would never endure the hardships of our Parents and Grandparents.
Nothing but spoiled Children in Adult bodies led by a band of power hungry Fools who think they own a money tree.
29
posted on
06/22/2009 10:32:13 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(One Man's Messiah is another Man's Fuhrer...)
To: Mind Freed
Can we make a Law that requires Abortion Clinics to have “Large Graphic Warnings” painted on the side of the Buildings?
More lives in this country have been lost to Abortion than Smoking, and at a much younger age.
30
posted on
06/22/2009 10:35:50 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(One Man's Messiah is another Man's Fuhrer...)
To: Mind Freed
I notice that the KYBO* tickets lately have been chaffing. Will the Beige One be looking into that matter soon? I'll be happy to give him a
close look at the results of this problem confronting Americans every day.
Nam Vet
31
posted on
06/22/2009 11:07:27 PM PDT
by
Nam Vet
("Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it." .... Henry David Thoreau)
To: paterfamilias
32
posted on
06/23/2009 2:26:37 AM PDT
by
FBD
(My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
To: Mind Freed
I can hardly wait for the 1st. official goverment schools to teach me how to smoke so I can smoke pot and get the maximum enjoymnt out of it.
33
posted on
06/23/2009 2:40:41 AM PDT
by
Waco
(Libs exhale too much)
To: Mind Freed
President Obama on Monday signed a landmark anti-smoking bill which he said will reduce the number of children who take up smoking and ultimately save American lives. If it really was about reducing the amount of children taking up smoking they would have put the age limit to purchase and possess at 21 (like alcohol).
There are only two lines in the bill that address the smoking age, in a nut shell it says they will study, withing a 5 year window, the impact on smoking rates if it age went to 21.
Raising the smoking age would cut underage smoking, what they really need to study is the impact of the tax revenue if they raised the age to 21. Tax 'em if you got 'em. Philip Morris wrote this bill.
34
posted on
06/23/2009 4:43:02 AM PDT
by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Life, Liberty and the Department of Happiness)
To: Mind Freed
Well, as long as we aren’t tapping phone calls placed to known terrorist cells overseas. I’m so glad we are rid of that Bushchimpyhitlerfascist!
(Come on, is a sarc tag really needed?)
35
posted on
06/23/2009 5:22:53 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Business is too big too fail... Government is too big to succeed... I am too small to matter...)
To: FBD
HAH! THE FREE MARKET RESPONSE TO LOW-TAR, LOW-NICOTINE CIGARETTES!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson