Posted on 06/26/2009 5:30:33 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
"A Himalayan Mountain of contradictory evidence"
CAMDEN, N.J. – Despite Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s objection to additional time being granted for defendants to respond to the complaint filed on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner questioning President Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility, U.S. District Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider, for the District of New Jersey, granted an extension until no later than June 29.
However, while Schneider noted the defendants’ failure to respond in a timely manner was not caused by neglect, he also stated, “Plaintiffs’ complaint raises significant issues necessitating that the named defendants engage competent counsel to represent their interests. Given the high ranking positions of the defendants, the decision as to who will represent them in this case is not simple and straightforward.”
Schneider also stated he was confident after all the attorneys enter their appearances on behalf of all defendants, “the case will proceed expeditiously.”
Schneider’s comments in Apuzzo’s case are a far cry from U.S. District Court Judge James Robertson’s comments, in which he summarily dismissed the case filed by Attorney John D. Hemenway in the District of Columbia on behalf of Gregory Hollister that also raised the question of Obama’s eligibility.
Robertson wrote in his order that Obama’s eligibility had been “blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry,” reprimanding Hemenway for filing a frivolous lawsuit, while Robertson relied on internet blogs in lieu of actual evidence.
In a May 2009 letter to Rupert Murdoch, with whom he attended Worcester College in the early fifties, Hemenway said it is rumored that Robertson, a Clinton appointee, is seeking an Obama appointment.
He also stated, “It is significant that, although dismissed, none of the twenty odd similar legal actions have been designated by the responsible judge as ‘frivolous.’”
He wrote, “Any rational person with even partial knowledge of the facts must know that Obama-cum-Soetoro is desperate to conceal something he does not want known. I believe he is hiding the fact that he and his campaign conspired to assert eligibility for the Presidential office to which he well may not be entitled. In other parts of the world, this would be known as a coup d’etat.”
Hemenway goes on to say “mainstream” news services and judges, including justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, have all failed to demand documentation to prove or disprove Obama’s qualifications to serve in the White House, as if a 53 percent vote is a substitute for an actual determination of his legal qualifications.
Hemenway told Murdoch, sadly, his Fox News now falls in that category as well, because he said, “[I]f Fox News is really to be a voice for rational conservatism in the United States, it cannot ignore this vital constitutional question: We have a man in the White House who refuses to disclose the very documents that would legitimize his Presidency."
As he awaits the responses to his clients’ complaint, Apuzzo has raised what he calls a “Himalayan Mountain” of contradictory evidence surrounding Obama’s birth and eligibility.
Keep the heat on him! This issue is a critical, fundamental Constitutional issue and deserves a fair and complete hearing and resolution.
My own belief is that 0bama is NOT a US Citizen and is holding the office under fraudulent circumstances.
I would like to be proven wrong...
I’m with you, but we want to be proven RIGHT! (lol)
Re: “Keep the heat on him! This issue is a critical, fundamental Constitutional issue and deserves a fair and complete hearing and resolution.
My own belief is that 0bama is NOT a US Citizen and is holding the office under fraudulent circumstances.
I would like to be proven wrong...”
I agree that it is likely that Zer0 lost his citizenship at some point in his world travels.
I feel like I am in a ‘Twilight Zone’ episode! Why don’t people see just how bizarre and potentially damning this is?! This pseudo-erudite liar has more than likely usurped our highest office! By fighting it just proves, as time goes on, how guilty he is.
Ridiculous.
Obama claims to have traveled to Pakistan in 1981 at age 20. At that time, Pakistan was on the U.S. no travel list. Thus, he didn’t use a U.S. passport. He used a British or Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan. If he used a British passport, then he was born in Kenya (British colony at the time of his birth). If he used a Indonesian passport, then his citizenship was changed to Indonesian as a minor child and he thus lost natural born American citizenship in that was.
As you can see, evidence continues to pile up against Obama. He appears to be lying?
Obama claims to have traveled to Pakistan in 1981 at age 20. At that time, Pakistan was on the U.S. “no travel” list. Thus, he didn’t use a U.S. passport. He used a British or Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan. If he used a British passport, then he was born in Kenya (British colony at the time of his birth). If he used a Indonesian passport, then his citizenship was changed to Indonesian as a minor child and he thus lost natural born American citizenship in that way.
As you can see, evidence continues to pile up against Obama. He appears to be lying?
I’m not holding my breath on these.
I will be surprised if OUR court system uphold the Constitution and the claims against the President.
Would be proper, I think, but I’m not holding my breath.
Eventually this will ‘pop’..however, how much damage will have been done?
I agree that this will eventually pop. Obama’s laws will all be reversed.
Please stop posting debunked rumors, it makes us all look bad. Although there was a travel advisory re: Pakistan in 1981, Pakistan was not on any State Department ‘no-travel’ list in 1981. There are plenty of chances to go after Obama for legitimate issues, so there is no need to go after him for this sort of stuff.
obumpa
bump for early morning read!
All it will take is one honest judge.
The military can take over and arrest everyone in the fraudulent administration, the congress, the courts, the media, the Fed, and Wall Street, who have participated in the electoral fraud and the economic dismantling of the nation. The states can replace the guilty parties in a reasonable manner, at a reasonable pace.
Having the military running the government temporarily would be an improvement over these yahoos, and it couldn't possibly harm the economy as much as what is currently happening.
Which passport did he use?
I’ve always said that Obama and the Democrats could not have won that election legally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.