Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cracked Houses: What the Boom Built
WSJ ^ | 01 July 2009 | M.P. McQueen

Posted on 07/01/2009 8:16:43 AM PDT by BGHater

Robert and Kay Lynn lay in bed shortly after closing on their new home in the Blue Oaks subdivision in Rancho Murieta, Calif., abutting an 18-hole golf course. They were listening to the “pop, pop, pop” of what they thought were acorns falling onto the roof.

The Lynns soon realized those were not acorns dropping on the roof.

“Little did we know it was the house cracking,” says Mrs. Lynn, 67 years old. Mr. Lynn, 68, says they bought the property in 2002 for $357,000 as a weekend home and an investment. The stucco house was moving and shifting, with part of it subtly pitching toward the golf course, resulting in cracks and fissures in the walls, ceiling and floors, the couple says.

Many of their neighbors say they had similar problems. In the Sacramento Valley subdivision of about 250 houses, more than half the residents have reported some type of flaw. The Lynns and dozens of their neighbors last year filed construction-defect lawsuits against the builders, and the lead case is expected to go to trial next week. They are seeking enough money to permanently repair the houses, a figure expected to total millions of dollars.

A spokeswoman for the builders, Reynen & Bardis Development LLC, said they would have no comment pending litigation, but a response the company’s attorneys filed with California Superior Court said time limits for some of the plaintiffs’ claims had run out.

Whatever the outcome of the case, hundreds of thousands of people from California to Georgia say their almost-new homes need costly repairs because of construction defects. The furious pace of home building from the late 1990s through the first half of the 2000s contributed to a surge in defects, experts say.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: building; cheaplabor; construction; homes; housing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2009 8:16:43 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I do hope amnesty is passed so we can get this problem to spread across the nation!


2 posted on 07/01/2009 8:17:41 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Crap homes built by cheap illegals. Thank God my home was built by “rednecks” who knew what they were doing.


3 posted on 07/01/2009 8:20:18 AM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

They spent $357,000 for a weekend home in their late sixties. God love ‘em


4 posted on 07/01/2009 8:20:52 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The builder will declare bankruptcy leaving the owners to twist in the wind. Six months later the builder will open a new business on the other end of town and continue his shoddy workmanship under a new name. Been there.


5 posted on 07/01/2009 8:22:07 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

A friend bought one of these badly-built McMansions. Shortly after they moved in, the rooms started to separate from the house. Floods followed, roof destruction, cracking foundation, daylight through the walls. They tried suing the builder. He laughed at them and moved back to Russia. They ended-up paying an additional 50% to get the house repaired by someone competent. However, this had nothing to do with a housing boom and everything to do with how we license builders.


6 posted on 07/01/2009 8:22:50 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

One wonders where the building inspectors were during this time. That is why they exist.


7 posted on 07/01/2009 8:23:12 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Although my home isn't new, it's a Condominium conversion that has been riddled with problems. When these places are retro fitted, the contractors often overlook the 20+ year old plumbing inside the walls, which eventually spring leaks.
8 posted on 07/01/2009 8:24:57 AM PDT by T Lady (The MSM: Pravda West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

At the height of a bubble, everyone is embezzling from everyone else- in this case, inspectors, bankers, homeowners, homebuilders, investors. That is the nature of a bubble. Eventually the players notice the inherent mendacity and the bubble pops.


9 posted on 07/01/2009 8:28:55 AM PDT by oblomov (Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. - Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

While I would love to agree with you, look at the “defect” THE HOUSE IS SHIFTING!!!!. In California this is common. We have land that is almost always on the move. If you want a house that doesn’t settle or slip you have to be careful where it is built.


10 posted on 07/01/2009 8:35:40 AM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

When my last house was 9 months old, it went through a fairly substantial earthquake (2001). The floor in the bathroom shifted almost an inch on one side, and a crack developed in one of the walls. My current house was built in 1972. It went through the same earthquake and a couple more. It has none of the same damage. After the old (new) house, my requirement for my next house was either 1- old construction or 2- custom construction that I personally oversaw. Since #2 wasn’t going to happen, I went with #1.


11 posted on 07/01/2009 8:43:52 AM PDT by conservative cat (America, you have been PWNED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
I call it "California Construction".
Cheap labor building homes with sub-standard foundations.
12 posted on 07/01/2009 8:46:24 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

If the inspectors are good we do not need builder licensing. Let the buyers seek a good inspector.


13 posted on 07/01/2009 8:46:38 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Tell me about your friend’s house. What did the foundation consist of? Was there a basement? Were proper footings installed?


14 posted on 07/01/2009 8:48:43 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Doesn't this same sort of thing happen to Habitat for Humanity houses?

Homes slapped together by clueless nonbuilders with no knowledge or experience that fall apart in 20 different ways a few years down the road...

15 posted on 07/01/2009 8:50:17 AM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

I have no idea.


16 posted on 07/01/2009 8:51:13 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
You have nailed it. Easy to do when you operate your bidness on other peoples' money.
17 posted on 07/01/2009 8:51:26 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
It turned out that much of Blue Oaks Estates was built on clay soil that expands in the rainy season and contracts in the scorching summers, the builder, Reynen & Bardis, acknowledges. This is damaging the homes’ foundations and subtly twisting the frames, causing homes to slowly pull apart—as evidenced by cracking floors, walls and ceilings, separating gutters, and jammed windows and doors.

We live in a tiny little house that was built sometime before 1940, and it has a pier and beam foundation, so that when the soil shifts (and in South Texas, you know it will), it can be re-leveled without a lot of hassle. It's creaky and drafty and apparently haunted, but I'm glad we didn't end up in one of the mid-boom houses.

18 posted on 07/01/2009 8:51:39 AM PDT by LongElegantLegs (It takes a viking to raze a village!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat

My first house was built in 1870. Every system — electrical, plumbing, etc. — had been a retrofit. But man! Was that house solid! The foundation was of huge granite blocks cemented together.


19 posted on 07/01/2009 8:54:15 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Well, it makes a BIG difference. I have no experience with California building techniques. However, if the house was built on a concrete slab, you are asking for trouble. If there is a proper foundation or a basement with proper footings, unless the ground was shifting, there should have been no problems.


20 posted on 07/01/2009 8:56:38 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson