Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin: Yeah, She’s Running And Ready To Rumble!
Strata Sphere Blog ^ | Jul 05 2009 | AJStrata

Posted on 07/05/2009 9:53:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

I pretty well nailed Governor Palin’s strategy when she announced. Today there is little doubt to what she intends to do:

“I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention, greater energy independence, stronger national security, and much-needed fiscal restraint,” the former Republican vice presidential candidate wrote in a posting on her Facebook page. Palin’s spokeswoman, Meghan Stapleton, confirmed Palin wrote the entry.

One thing I did forget to mention in the previous post which is clear today - Palin is going to shove as much crow down as many arrogant, mouthy throats in the Political Industrial Complex as she can. And America will be cheering her on for the next decade as she does so. And she began today:

“To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as ‘fact’ that Governor Palin resigned because she is ‘under federal investigation’ for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation,” Van Flein said in a statement. “This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law.”

The FBI reiterated that claim Saturday, telling the Los Angeles Times for a story Sunday that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was not investigating Palin’s activities as governor, a former mayor or in any other capacity.


(Excerpt) Read more at strata-sphere.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: gopimplosion; palin; palinattacks; sarah; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2009 9:53:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SolidWood; Marine_Uncle

fyi


2 posted on 07/05/2009 9:54:58 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention,

Well, she better reconcile this statement with the following statement from her website:

We also slowed the rate of government growth...

Is she FOR government growth or AGAINST it?

Don't blow smoke up our butts, Gov. Palin.

We're not as stupid as Ubama voters who can't tell they're being played for fools when he says one thing one day and the complete opposite the next.

Good luck to you, though. You have my support. But you're going to have to continue to earn it.

3 posted on 07/05/2009 9:58:16 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

She’s not “all in” — She’s “ready to rumble”!! :)


4 posted on 07/05/2009 9:59:29 PM PDT by zorro8987 (i support Special Olympics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The intense speculation and continued attacks on Sarah Palin are remarkable. As I put it to libs on huffington toast: if she is too stupid, unprepared and damaged to run for POTUS in 2012 then you would think libs would encourage her to run. They would build her up like the media did McCain in 2008.

But instead they are all out trying to destroy her. Think of this fellow Palin supporters (you probably already have): She just made a decision and announcement that would have killed the career of anyone else. Yest even today the MSM have stories with questioning headlines like : Palin setting up for 2012?


5 posted on 07/05/2009 10:04:56 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras
But instead they are all out trying to destroy her.

She represents a normal life, The abnormals cannot handle it.

6 posted on 07/05/2009 10:08:40 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Palin could easily become the next Reagan/Thatcher and the Libs know it. They are terrified of her so they keep on beating her down. Given the terror surfacing in the minds and hearts of the idiot Americans that voted for Obama, she can win. The bloom is off the rose and Obama is exposed for the fraudulent incompetent he actually is. 2010 will be very interesting. Once again, the GOP buffoon show may win by default!
7 posted on 07/05/2009 10:11:26 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bump


8 posted on 07/05/2009 10:13:42 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Isn't that more or less what she said at her announcement? How does that mean she is running for anything?

She might just spend her time campaigning for other people who are running for office and try to help the Republicans pick up some House and Senate seats. This would add some national cohesion to some races which would otherwise be seen as local contests.

If this is supposed to be some sort of springboard to higher office, I'd say it's along the lines of McCain's suspending his campaign to pass the $700 Billion stimulus bill. Possibly mildly successful, but probably horrendously disastrous.
9 posted on 07/05/2009 10:21:35 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Carbon Dioxide is NOT POLLUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Great post. So glad to see the righteous FOX-bashing responses. FOX deserves every bit of it.


10 posted on 07/05/2009 10:24:35 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

When you bring your car to an halt... you first slow down.


11 posted on 07/05/2009 10:28:28 PM PDT by SolidWood (Palin isn't retreating, but taking the fight in another direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
When you bring your car to an halt... you first slow down.

Lame. Gummint is not a car.

Next!

12 posted on 07/05/2009 10:29:10 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
... the following statement from her website:

That refers to her position and actions in Alaska, whereas the prior statement refers to the US in general. No reconciliation needed.

13 posted on 07/05/2009 10:32:14 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brityank
That refers to her position and actions in Alaska, whereas the prior statement refers to the US in general. No reconciliation needed.

ehhhhhhh.....yeah.

If she couldn't reduce the size of government in Alaska, how can she say she will reduce it in all of America?

Kind of reminds me of how Ubama campaigned on how he was going to solve all of America's problems when he couldn't even solve Chicago's problems.

I haven't done a search yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if Alaska has a smaller population than Chicago.

Don't get me wrong. I'm a Palin admirer. But not a worshipper. She better sort these things out ahead of time or don't say them at all.

14 posted on 07/05/2009 10:35:57 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Uh dude, do you have reading comprehension issues?

She didn’t say NO government growth. She said LESS. As long as there are progressives in powerful places, government is going to be out of step. She is not Superwoman, and no politician will be able to fix it all. Slowing the rate of government growth is the first step to bringing about less of it which is certainly a start.


15 posted on 07/05/2009 10:36:37 PM PDT by Blogger (Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Uh dude, do you have reading comprehension issues?

My r.c. skills are better than yours, my brothah.

She didn’t say NO government growth. She said LESS.

She said less government INTERVENTION not less government GROWTH. How can you have less intervention with growth of any kind?

16 posted on 07/05/2009 10:44:39 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

You’re straining at a gnat.

It is okay to trust but verify. But, to pretend that Sarah failed to fight against government just isn’t a fair assessment of her time in Alaska. Was she perfect? No. But far better than most out there. We will wait and see Sarah away from the governors seat and McCain’s handlers to see the real lady. I don’t think we will be disappointed.


17 posted on 07/05/2009 10:49:01 PM PDT by Blogger (Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
You’re straining at a gnat.

LOL. Yeah. Trillions of them.

18 posted on 07/05/2009 10:50:18 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Not due to Sarah though.


19 posted on 07/05/2009 10:50:59 PM PDT by Blogger (Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Not due to Sarah though.

It's a pre-emptive strike. I don't want her lying to me just like I don't want Ubama lying to me.

We're not Ubama voters. At least I'm not. I don't know about the rest of you. Maybe some of you people believed Ubama when he campaigned on a platform of saving or creating 2.5 million new jobs. But not me.

Maybe some of you believe you have to lose 6 million jobs before you can create 150,000 new jobs. But not me.

Maybe some of you believe we have to increase the national debt by 4 trillion dollars before we cut it in half. But not me.

20 posted on 07/05/2009 10:54:52 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

21 posted on 07/05/2009 11:02:55 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
AJ really did some good work with the piece he wrote Friday:

Forget All The Palin Nonsense - She Running For President

******************************EXCERPTS*******************************

Published by AJStrata at 8:00 pm under 2010 Elections, Sarah Palin

Final Update: For all those who think a bold move is a handicap, that is why you are in the peanut gallery and Sarah Palin is the talk of the weekend across this nation. I send this especially to some armchair experts in the conservative blogosphere who scratched their heads and claimed Sarah made a mistake. Hate to say this folks, but the mistake is assuming Americans would agree with you - now that you are also part of the useless and inept political chattering class. We have seen years of ‘experts’ hit DC and blow it on many fronts. Claiming Palin did not do what was best for her and Alaska because it doesn’t fit some mold or theory or history is really assuming we know all we need to know about politics and people.

For all those who smear her with asinine conspiracy theories - the mirror is on you. For example, Iran’s revolution not withstanding, Andrew Sullivan sunk from an interesting political commentator to all out scum over Palin. His hate of her destroyed him, and left Sarah completely untouched and a sympathetic victim to Sullivan’s mad ravings.

And to the Palin’s. Good luck in life. I agree with the decision. Sarah had accomplished a lot, and the muck loving Sullivans in the world had made it nearly impossible to do more  for Alaska. They have a Phyrric victory, but again, you can destroy something for the moment, but the act itself destroys you 100 times over.

I strongly hope Sarah will be back next year, building her Congressional base in 2010 that will lift her into 2012. I know she is wondering if it is all worth it. I can only give her this advice. Your son is in Iraq trying to make the world better for all of us. He is risking it all. All of our families will be suffering for decades to come if the Democrats are pulled from office for the ineptitude and failures. You too may have to sacrifice a lot for this country. But at least it will not be the same as those who gave the ultimate sacrifice in the war on terror.


22 posted on 07/05/2009 11:09:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; NormsRevenge; SunkenCiv; potlatch; Fred Nerks; SE Mom

Good photo....thanks!


23 posted on 07/05/2009 11:19:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Palin: Yeah, She’s Running And Ready To Rumble!"

Yep. She's ready to go to war.


24 posted on 07/05/2009 11:22:18 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

Put down the copy of the New York Times you are reading, step away slowly and take a deep breath.


25 posted on 07/05/2009 11:26:18 PM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
Just posted this from Washington Post:

On Twitter, Palin Lashes Out at Critics

26 posted on 07/05/2009 11:59:20 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

If she really wanted to “blow smoke up our butts” she would have said she had completely stopped government growth! She tells the truth, why do you have a problem with that. Last time I looked, Governors had to work with legislatures. They aren’t dictators like Obamie.. Pain actually respects the rule of law and the Constitution - of her State and the USA.


27 posted on 07/06/2009 12:12:25 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Pain=Palin!

Dang these fingernails! I need to shorten them... twice tonight with the typos!

28 posted on 07/06/2009 12:15:04 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
If she couldn't reduce the size of government in Alaska, how can she say she will reduce it in all of America?

Give me a friggin' break! She cut Alaska' budget to the bone despite howls of outrage there. Get a clue, bub.

29 posted on 07/06/2009 3:57:00 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Has it ever occurred to you, that "slowing the rate of government growth" is a preliminary step to "cutting government"?

Think of putting the brakes on a car -- the stop isn't instantaneous.

(I understand that, being a Texan, you can't help but be jealous of the only state larger than you; and that Sarah Palin is no Gov. Perry, who tried to force vaccinations for STD's on schoolgirls. But *do* try to keep your feelings in check.)

Cheers!

30 posted on 07/06/2009 4:10:47 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
MSNBC Morning Joe talkers are in heavy attack mode, LOL, I love it.
31 posted on 07/06/2009 4:14:51 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
She represents a normal life,

Which scares the crap out of the northeast, Ivy League, liberal elitists and the Chicago thugs.

32 posted on 07/06/2009 4:53:55 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zorro8987
She’s not “all in” — She’s “ready to rumble”!! :)

Exactly!

We've all been wanting a strong conservative voice that would challenge the Obonga regime and get national attention and Palin has accepted the challenge.

We need to support her every way we can.

33 posted on 07/06/2009 5:14:37 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Preemptive my derriere. You’re just shooting your mouth off because Sarah has done nothing worthy of such a strike yet and has enough people piling on her without the Conservatives doing it as well.

Remember the Reagan doctrine - trust but verify. You’re forgetting the trust part. I know that is hard with politicians because precious few of them are worthy of trust at all. But we are never going to get perfect politicians because we will never get perfect people. We need to support those who show themselves to be conservatives and chuck them to the side when a pattern of behavior shows otherwise. The proof will be in what they do, not what they say. Until then, hold your tongue. If she screws up, grace is warranted to the extent that it becomes apparent that she isn’t who she portrayed herself to be. If that were to occur, then you would have all the ground you need to criticize and dismiss. In the mean time, support those you can and don’t just sit there and complain about imagined future deeds.


34 posted on 07/06/2009 5:44:41 AM PDT by Blogger (Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

That Donnie Duschbag is a putz. WHat a creep and sexist pig too. Rabid dog


35 posted on 07/06/2009 6:03:37 AM PDT by GoCards (Behind Sarah 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The only part of her strategy that is unclear is how she will maintain her high public profile. Mike Huckabee has made a shrewd move by having the show on Fox and he has somewhat changed some of the views he had held as governor of Arkansas.

Reagan was not in public office for six years when he ran in 1980, but he kept his profile up by having a weekly radio speech/coorespondence. She is going to have to have some type of outlet to the public on a regular basis. This part of the strategy has not been revealed yet, it will be interesting to see what it is.


36 posted on 07/06/2009 8:40:30 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bttt


37 posted on 07/06/2009 10:43:17 AM PDT by GOPJ (Central park didn't hit 85 degrees in June this year - last time was 1916. Al Gore is nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Please name a prominent conservative office holder for me who has decreased the size of government.


38 posted on 07/06/2009 4:02:11 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Please name a prominent conservative office holder for me who has decreased the size of government.

I can't.

But if one brags about slowing the rate of growth of government, I will call him or her on it as well.

Call me Mr. Consistency.

39 posted on 07/06/2009 5:02:40 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Wow. You Palin worshippers sure are touchy.

All I said was I didn't like her boasting about slowing the rate of growth of government on the basis that it still represents government growth. And as a Conservative, I am naturally opposed to government growth.

That doesn't mean I don't like the woman. I do. Aks my wife. She thinks I have a crush on her.

40 posted on 07/06/2009 5:06:44 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I worship Christ. I like Sarah. I disagree with your assessment of what she has done.


41 posted on 07/06/2009 6:04:16 PM PDT by Blogger (Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
I disagree with your assessment of what she has done.

So do I.

42 posted on 07/06/2009 8:46:22 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Think of putting the brakes on a car -- the stop isn't instantaneous.

Weak. Government is not a car. Next!

43 posted on 07/06/2009 8:49:56 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Give me a friggin' break! She cut Alaska' budget to the bone despite howls of outrage there. Get a clue, bub.

She's the one who said she grew the size of Alaska's government, sugar lumps.

I guess if you can grow government and reduce the budget then you can spend trillions of dollars and reduce the deficit.

44 posted on 07/06/2009 9:00:07 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Think of putting the brakes on a car -- the stop isn't instantaneous.

Weak. Government is not a car. Next!

You're right, government is MUCH harder to stop. More like changing course on an aircraft carrier.

Or, look at differential calculus. If you have a continuously differentiable function, you cannot have a change in sign of the second derivative without the first derivative passing through zero. And if the first derivative is itself continuously differentiable, if it starts out positive, it must decrease smoothly, to zero, and then become negative.

Tea parties (the original) and the like excepted.

Cheers!

45 posted on 07/07/2009 5:31:30 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
You're right, government is MUCH harder to stop. More like changing course on an aircraft carrier.

She didn't say she was changing course. She said she slowed the rate of growth of government.

To use your aircraft carrier analogy, that would be like the Admiral of the ship telling his crew, "Yes. We are headed straight for the huge pile of rocks but the good news is we are no longer at full throttle, we are at half throttle."

So that ship will take longer to hit the rocks but it will still hit them. Wonderful. Should the crew give him a standing ovation for that?

I wouldn't.

46 posted on 07/08/2009 1:54:28 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
To use your aircraft carrier analogy, that would be like the Admiral of the ship telling his crew, "Yes. We are headed straight for the huge pile of rocks but the good news is we are no longer at full throttle, we are at half throttle."

I suppose it's better than the Admiral who wants to put an afterburner on the ship though, isn't it? Or the Admiral who says "what rocks, full speed ahead!" You have to start somewhere, and while I agree it would be great to get some actual cuts to government, slowing the rate of growth is the best anyone could do under the earlier political climate.

In this economy though, I expect you'll soon see people running on the basis of making actual cuts in order to be fiscally responsible. Who would you rather have in that situation? Someone who will cut wasteful programs, or the standard liberal ploy of "we're out of money, cut the police and fire departments and empty the prisons!" I would argue that Sarah is already positioned to take advantage of running in such a climate.

The only way to really cut government is to elect people who will actually cut spending. One politician alone can't do it, but if she has millions of followers holding their representatives feet to the fire, or millions of people voting in representatives to help her. . .

47 posted on 07/08/2009 2:16:52 PM PDT by The Enlightener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: The Enlightener
I suppose it's better than the Admiral who wants to put an afterburner on the ship though, isn't it?

I suppose so. All hail the captain who ran the ship aground at half-speed.

(sigh) We are so screwed.

48 posted on 07/08/2009 2:33:39 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Slowing the rate of growth is what must be done BEFORE it can be decreased. I consider Sarah saying she “slowed the rate of growth” to be not only honest, but to be commendable as well. Very few persons in holding office during the last 50 years have been able to honestly say that.


49 posted on 07/09/2009 11:08:17 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Slowing the rate of growth is what must be done BEFORE it can be decreased.

No it doesn't.

I consider Sarah saying she “slowed the rate of growth” to be not only honest, but to be commendable as well.

Honest? Yes. Commendable? No.

50 posted on 07/09/2009 7:47:09 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson