Posted on 07/11/2009 2:32:08 PM PDT by Minion
Maybe a little too red on the eyes Chris.
The photo is from 2009 and comes from Chris Miller of the AP.
I could be wrong on this, but I know Photoshop and that adjustment would not be hard.
If true would just be another indication of how reckless and out of hand the AP still is.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Still looks delicious to me.
I thought I saw one of Palin last week where the pupils looked a bit red-orange as if she were a space-alien. I didn’t try to capture it though.
She’s probably pretty burnt out.
I do not like Sarah’s glasses. Very poor choice of shape, IMHO.
Other than that, I can’t find fault with anything else about her.
She looks beautiful as always.
She’s beautiful.
Just a little tired perhaps.
What element(s) are you saying is photoshopped?
Geez...I don’t see an issue....
I don’t know about photoshop but closeup portraits taken below eye level are generally not flattering.
If AP photoshopped her pic, you have to ask how many more were photoshopped to discredit her. Yep, mainstream media is cutting their own throat.
I agree with you. I believe we are going to have to be very watchful about the pictures that MSM puts out there... knowing how unethical they are and in obamanations pockets
oh, the eyes...sorry, I just woke up
I don't doubt that AP tries to pick the least flattering pictures of conservatives. However, I very much doubt that they photoshopped it because: (1)It doesn't look that bad, and (2) Hard working people often don't get enough sleep.
Because of the bags under my hard working eyes, I often wear my glasses when I don't really need to. I suspect many other do as well. Maybe Sarah does. I always thought she was more attractive without the glasses.
Huh?
Your tin foil hat is too tight. Sarah is a human being and can have blood shot eyes. If they photoshopped the pic they would’ve done far worse things.
Please explain why you believe that this photo has been manipulated.
I think her glasses look very nice on her and fit her face well.
Huh what?
I didn’t say it was an ugly pic of her, did you read and understand my post?
Nor do I ..what is the gist of this? That AP either added or subtracted red-eye from the photo? I don't see any problem with the photo, for or against
Also her eyes have that slight gaze. It's noticeable on many photos. It's very very cute IMO.
I looked at other pics too, and you’re right. I hadn’t noticed it before.
I wonder why she doesn’t try contacts? Or Lasik, for that matter.
Maybe because of the shape of her eyeballs or the possibility that she has some other reason that Lasik can’t be performed. You don’t simply “try” surgery. I’ve been examined for both contacts and laser surgery and was not a candidate for either.
what exactly is wrong with it?
Like I said “I could be wrong”. Its just funny that she looks like she’s been drinking all night. Doesn’t anyone remember the PS tricks they pulled with condolezza’s photos?
http://www.alexanderjason.com/alteration-condi.htm
Wouldn’t put it past them...I still remember the picture of Rush Limbaugh that tried to make him look like he was evil incarnate. Luckily the Libs need no such photoshopping the look naturally goofy or evil....LOL
Does anyone else see a hammer-and-sickle pattern to the earring? I’m not saying it is, or that’s where her sympathies, lie, just commenting on the shape.
I think she uses her glasses because:
1. they’d say she was too pretty if she didn’t and then would write her off as a bimbo.
2. she needs them to see clearly and doesn’t like contacts.
3. the glasses give her some visual ‘gravitas’ (see #1).
I’m going with #2 but she probably would be attacked as too pretty if she didn’t have them.
IMHO
I seem to recall having seen that pic before - or one very similar to it - and didn’t notice the red eyes. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to find out they doctored it.
-
-
Here is a detailed description of your image, PALIN_t756.jpeg:
Image: PALIN_t756.jpeg
Base filename: MagickStudio.mpc
Format: jpeg (Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format) Class: DirectClass Geometry: 756x502+0+0 Resolution: 72x72
Print size: 10.5x6.97222
Units: Undefined
Type: TrueColor
Endianess: Undefined
Colorspace: RGB
Depth: 8-bit
Channel depth:
red: 8-bit
green: 8-bit
blue: 8-bit
Channel statistics:
red:
min: 0 (0)
max: 255 (1)
mean: 137.166 (0.537905)
standard deviation: 59.4582 (0.233169)
kurtosis: -0.849215
skewness: 0.128619
green:
min: 0 (0)
max: 255 (1)
mean: 102.237 (0.400929)
standard deviation: 54.6948 (0.21449)
kurtosis: -0.486933
skewness: 0.709487
blue:
min: 0 (0)
max: 255 (1)
mean: 74.2987 (0.291367)
standard deviation: 59.2013 (0.232162)
kurtosis: 0.232399
skewness: 1.17777
Image statistics:
Overall:
min: 0 (0)
max: 255 (1)
mean: 78.4253 (0.30755)
standard deviation: 71.0925 (0.278794)
kurtosis: -0.688018
skewness: 0.636321
Rendering intent: Undefined
Interlace: None
Background color: white
Border color: rgb(223,223,223)
Matte color: grey74
Transparent color: black
Page geometry: 756x502+0+0
Dispose: Undefined
Iterations: 0
Compression: JPEG
Quality: 85
Orientation: Undefined
Properties:
create-date: 2009-07-11T18:03:20-04:00
jpeg:colorspace: 2
jpeg:sampling-factor: 2x2,1x1,1x1
modify-date: 2009-07-11T18:03:20-04:00
signature: 4a62cbd095bf4d0d2f620c4b10559aaf677729fd551f818425bf089e0fc208d7 Tainted: False Filesize: 398b Number pixels: 371kb Version: ImageMagick 6.5.4-2 2009-07-01 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
-
Quality: 85
signature: 4a62cbd095bf4d0d2f620c4b10559aaf677729fd551f818425bf089e0fc208d7
Tainted: False
Filesize: 398b
Number pixels: 371kb
-
OFGS! I see a stylized, running canine. Wolf, possibly native craft.
You’re kidding right? /s
She has a very nice frame
I understand that you weren’t saying it’s ugly... I just didn’t get the “below eye line” thing...
What did they change?
Ah OK - I see that shape now. Didn’t see it before.
You are the only one that has said that. Yet you want to accuse AP of (maybe) doctoring the photo. Very interesting.
They do hate her, don’t they. I’m not a big fan of the terminator movies, but for some reason she reminds me of Sarah Connor from those movies.
Yes, the earrings look like the hammer-and-sickle.
Actually her earring looks more like a cute little Husky pup than anything commie, as it were ... then again, I've been known to misread clear signs of world globalization conspiracy theories, such as the eyeball-in-the-pyramid thingie on a dollar bill ....
Where is that tin-foil hat guy on the radio picture when ya need it?
/grin
I saw a sled dog, since they are into that kinda thing.
ImageMagick is a really great program, I batch process photo’s with it on an almost daily basis. Could not maintain 37,000 website images plus thumbnails without it.
Use it command line, very fast.
Regards,
TF
Is that the worst OP can do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.