Posted on 07/19/2009 8:37:50 PM PDT by Steelfish
Miss Robbins, now 18, faced the non-agonising choice of whether or not to have sex
DUH
Didn’t read the article to see that it was UK. Will not have to look far to find one we can blame on LBJ.
Aww.. they are beautiful.
The gentleman doesn’t want to get tied down, you see.
yes we can support her decision to carry all three to term. I wish we could carry things a step farther, and encourage/compel people who can’t take care of these kids to give them up for adoption.
Young people nowadays can’t believe that there used to be homes for unwed mothers. They can’t believe that it was scandalous to be pregnant without a husband. All of that is beyond their comprehension. Yet, it was society’s solution to a difficult problem, to give those babies up for adoption to families who could provide for them. Can anyone honestly say that today’s solution, to just let these young girls go on welfare and live difficult lives is better for them or their children?
What beautiful babies. The snoozing tyke with his fist obliviously stuck in brother’s face is especially cute.
As for baby daddy Callum not having a job, Her Majesty’s forces could probably find something for him if he can pass the aptitude test.
“Her Majestys forces could probably find something for him if he can pass the aptitude test.”
That’s intriguing. If England passed a law requiring that a male who impregnates an unmarried female would be required to immediately enter military service, I bet the preggers rate would go down real quick.
So Cute!
No, but the abortion rate would rise accordingly.
Looks like they're being well cared for by the Mum. Nice looking couple and family, I wish them well and who doesn't need a helping hand now and then.
That's not saying it's been easy, but they made a CHOICE to make it work...and sometimes you fake it til you make it...and they have.
good story
that’s four more western European babies that Britain certainly needs to counter the massive christian hating muzzies that are being produced there in mass
Hail St. Joseph.
Yep, that technique has worked for hundreds of years. It’s called putting the children first.
Well, if you think about it, a married couple where the husband works and the wife is a stay-at-home mom isn’t going to get a lot of gov’t assistance, if any. Now, if the stay-at-home mom is ‘single’ and unemployed, she’s getting loads of assistance, and if the boyfriend has a job, he can use that to help support the children in addition to what the mom is getting from welfare. So yeah, I suppose it would be more profitable...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.