Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans ARE WAY WORSE Than The Democrats

Posted on 08/07/2009 3:28:37 PM PDT by Stephen Colbert

The enemy you know is way worse than the enemy that acts like your friend only to stab you in the back.

Once Republicans have the numbers again in the future they're not going to reduce the size of government in any meaningful way, ever. THAT'S A PROMISE. We're on a one way path to larger and larger government.

The way Republicans talk you'd think when they're in power they'd put half the federal government and spending on the chopping block. Surely that's what the republican constituents want, right? I think politicians of both parties forget that they are not our leaders, they are our elected representatives. The difference being that we're supposed to tell them what we want, not them tell us what we should want.

Democrats tax and spend, Republicans borrow and spend. Neither ever ever ever cuts spending.

Spending and our debt exploded under Reagen, and they exploded under Bush.

At the democrats advertize that they want to spend money. They get people that actually agree with their socialist agenda to vote for them. They are wrong, but atleast they advertize what they are going to do.

Republicans however campaign on cutting spending, cutting the size of the government. But once they get in power, do they slash the government at all, do they keep any of their promises? No, not even slightly. THEY LIE TO US CONSISTENTLY, TELL US EXACTLY WHAT WE WANT TO HEAR, THEN STAB US IN THE BACK AS SOON AS THEY GET OUR VOTE.

They are the real enemy here. The size of the government, and the debt exploded under Reagen, and it exploded even more under Bush. Bush gave us Medicare Part D, the trillion dollar bailout of Wallstreet, and the 1.3 trillion dollar debt when he left office. He didn't veto a single one of these, the republicans didn't oppose any of these. They are reason we are in this mess.

Stop letting this continue.

NEVER EVER VOTE FOR A CAREER POLITICIAN, NO MATTER WHAT THEY TELL YOU, NO MATTER WHAT THEY PROMISE, THEY ARE LYING.

The only way we are ever ever going to get our country back is to elect in regular ordinary people, like Sarah Palin.

Heck I would happily support the one and only exception that proves the rule, the one and only politician that has ever ever voted against Reagen's and Bush's bloated budgets, government expansions and spending sprees, Ron Paul.

But if the GOP doesn't nominate a real person, not a politician. If they nominate another RINO like Tim Pawlentiny, or Mitt Romney or anyone in the Senate or House, I urge you please, please, don't vote for them.

Demand that Sarah Palin run as a third party candidate and vote for her instead. Even if it costs us the election, it will atleast send the GOP a message and maybe next time, they will put a real person, not a politician on the ticket.

Yes, it sucks to lose. But if we did this back in 2008, if we refused to vote for McCain and instead voted for a none-Rino. If we asked Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate and voted for him, then maybe we wouldn't have wound up with another RINO/Career Politician like Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlentiny as our nominee in 2012.

The way Republicans talk you'd think when they're in power they'd put half the federal government and spending on the chopping block.

But once in power, they never, ever, ever, ever come remotely close to doing that. Not even close. They lie to us.

So please, I beg of you, just say no. No politicians. Either we get a real person on the ticket, or vote third party.


TOPICS: History; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: gop; iatz; illiterate; kittenfodder; kittychow; meowmix; olbermann; ronpaul; troll; trolltimer; valhallaiamcoming; victorkilo; vikingkittens; vikingkitty; vk; weareyouroverlords; whenvksfeast; z; zap; zot; zotmeharder; zotmenow; zotorama; zz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-102 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2009 3:28:37 PM PDT by Stephen Colbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Well aren’t you just precious.


2 posted on 08/07/2009 3:29:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Very subtle


3 posted on 08/07/2009 3:31:24 PM PDT by TomOnTheRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

this jerk can’t even fake it as a Troll...why waste the Zot?


4 posted on 08/07/2009 3:31:47 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Pray for Israel! And Georgia ! And the Iranian people! and Honduras!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert; Old Sarge

Well, hi there.


5 posted on 08/07/2009 3:32:17 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Okay...I’ll play. And how are things over at Comedy Central these days?


6 posted on 08/07/2009 3:32:25 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ("First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win!" Mahatma Ghandi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
>Either we get a real person on the ticket, or vote third party

The next president
will be Republican or
Democrat. Think right.

7 posted on 08/07/2009 3:33:13 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

So do you have a link to whatever horse’s azz site you cribbed this from??


8 posted on 08/07/2009 3:34:10 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Spending and our debt exploded under Reagen, and they exploded under Bush.

It's well documented that Reagan's budgets presented to congress would have produced a surplus. He inherited the Great Depression and left us with the greatest boom in US history. Hussein's first 100 days produced higher deficits than Bush's last 6 years in office.

9 posted on 08/07/2009 3:34:29 PM PDT by T. Jefferson (Batton down the hatches, full speed in reverse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Spending and our debt exploded under Reagen, and they exploded under Bush.

Chump change compared to what Obama has done in six months and what he is planning to do to kill capitalism for generations in America.

10 posted on 08/07/2009 3:34:36 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (When, America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert; Old Sarge; 50mm; darkwing104

11 posted on 08/07/2009 3:35:56 PM PDT by paulycy (Screw the RACErs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

His ‘writers’ penned it.


12 posted on 08/07/2009 3:36:05 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ("First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win!" Mahatma Ghandi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert; 230FMJ; 50mm; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; AliVeritas; Allegra; ...
Three posts, all exactly the same...Are you a broken record?

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.

13 posted on 08/07/2009 3:37:26 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Welcome to FR, Stephen. There are some FReepers who will accuse you of copying this stupefying drivel from somebody’s website, but I’m not one of those. I have faith in you Stephen. I believe you wrote this all by yourself.


14 posted on 08/07/2009 3:37:44 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Wrong.

Photobucket

15 posted on 08/07/2009 3:38:01 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Why bless your pointy little head.


16 posted on 08/07/2009 3:38:12 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Kitten food.


17 posted on 08/07/2009 3:38:47 PM PDT by Jemian (PAM of JT ~~ A community organizer cannot complain when communities organize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

and IBTZ!


18 posted on 08/07/2009 3:38:49 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CHBvKGmevI


19 posted on 08/07/2009 3:39:01 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

You’re not Colbert. Colbert was never funny, couldn’t coherently construct a joke and is so overrated he needs his liberal lackey media to TELL US he’s funny.


20 posted on 08/07/2009 3:39:28 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
So please, I beg of you, just say no. No politicians. Either we get a real person on the ticket, or vote third party.

Well, I can't say I disagree with you.

21 posted on 08/07/2009 3:39:41 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Blow out!

Third party means divide the conservative vote, giving your guy the victory again.

No, thanks.


22 posted on 08/07/2009 3:41:02 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Beat it A hole, no one could be worse than Obama.


23 posted on 08/07/2009 3:41:18 PM PDT by dforest (Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Dang, dude, looking at that chart just ruined my apetite.


24 posted on 08/07/2009 3:41:40 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

25 posted on 08/07/2009 3:41:55 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (will work for bailout bonus.... Twitter: maddawggmorgan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Welcome to Free Republic.

If only you had joined before the last election!

Btw, love seeing you on Comedy Central, although now that I think of it, I haven't watched that channel in years.


26 posted on 08/07/2009 3:42:43 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

It really is hard to believe...(those are estimates, the real deficits will be much worse).


27 posted on 08/07/2009 3:43:27 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

When was the last time you bathed?


28 posted on 08/07/2009 3:44:02 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Vote third party?

Like Socialist Party?
Communist Party?
International Green Party?
Worker's World Party?
Socialist Worker's Party?


29 posted on 08/07/2009 3:44:45 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

First, neither Reagan nor Bush the elder had a Republican congress. (Reagan had a Republican Senate for six years) Bush the Younger had a barely Republican Congress for about half of his two terms.

If the population and the economy are growing, if previous entitlement programs make certain expenditures completely impossible to control (e.g. government pension programs, veterans commitments, interest on the national debt), then yes, the spending may not go down in absolute numbers.

It has been said that Reagan was relatively indifferent to deficits, because his proposal of a $90 billion budget cut, in 1976 dollars, cost him the Florida primary and therefore the nomination. It didn’t help in 1980 when the military’s preparedness was completely sacrificed by J.E.C. Also, some thought that it would be better to expend political capital on tax cuts, rather than spending cuts, because the deficits themselves would ultimately prove a check on spending (until the current W.H. occupant decided that trillion dollar checks were worth writing.)

When did spending come under some control? Under Grahm-Rudman, under Newt Gingrich’s House. Under a Clinton that had lost his Congress due to his own performance and had to act more carefully.

While the spending never actually went down in absolute dollars, it really did go down as a portion of the GDP. SPENDING ORIGINATES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

Unfortunately, Bush the Younger didn’t want to keep the brakes on, won on promises to spend (No Child Left Behind, Medicare Prescription benefits), and finally felt obliged to spend a lot on restructuring large chunks of the government after 9/11, and of course the wars, which requires spending if you are going to do it at all. Finally, the autumn financial crisis scared him again, and spending money and making financial commitments was the fastest and easiest (though not best) way to address that.

Up until Bush the Younger, who was given a couple of pretty tough challenges, you see LESS spending, and more responsibility from the Republican Congress, Reagan and even Bush the Elder (save the S&L debacle, which I believe was due to the ill conceived TEFRA act.)


30 posted on 08/07/2009 3:45:49 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Throw all career politicians out.


31 posted on 08/07/2009 3:46:33 PM PDT by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
If we asked Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate and voted for him,

Ron Paul knew where the press and money was. He was an RINO. Libertarian running as a Republican.

Meanwhile the Libertarians ran Bob Barr as their candidate. How well did he do?

32 posted on 08/07/2009 3:46:51 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Republicans ARE WAY WORSE Than The Democrats

Whew.....

.....Do you feel better now?

33 posted on 08/07/2009 3:47:07 PM PDT by SteamShovel (When hope trumps reality, there is no hope at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert; darkwing104


34 posted on 08/07/2009 3:47:32 PM PDT by glock rocks (health care, gun safety and climate change are strawmen. It's all about CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Can’t spell Reagan. for one thing...


35 posted on 08/07/2009 3:47:47 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

36 posted on 08/07/2009 3:48:05 PM PDT by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

37 posted on 08/07/2009 3:48:19 PM PDT by 50mm (AARP is a steaming pile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

This guy is going to make Carter look like Barry Goldwater. In a race for worst president in half a century he’s starting to leave Jimmy Carter in his tail lights.


38 posted on 08/07/2009 3:48:19 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

And to think we used to listen to this guy every night. Can’t abide him or his pal Jon Stewart. They’ll be stuck in the Comedy Central universe for the rest of their careers, hopefully.


39 posted on 08/07/2009 3:48:26 PM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

40 posted on 08/07/2009 3:48:28 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Ez 38 Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

While this piece of S#*t is obviously a troll,he does make a valid point about the Republicratic push towards State-ism.Some say its the lesser of two evils we must support,I say I`ll not support a Fascist jealous,Freedom hating, Dictator DemocRAT wanna be “RINO”.Either we re-take the party of Reagan or I`ll pick and choose who I vote for.


41 posted on 08/07/2009 3:49:15 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
Demand that Sarah Palin run as a third party candidate and vote for her instead. Even if it costs us the election, it will atleast send the GOP a message and maybe next time, they will put a real person, not a politician on the ticket.

The GOP didn't select McCain as the top of the ticket. The Media and DNC did. Howard Dean's staffers were part of Democrats for McCain going back to 2006.

There were McCain staffers who left the McCain Campaign for Obama's campaign just days after they secured McCain the nomination. Mission accomplished.

42 posted on 08/07/2009 3:49:22 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

What a waste of oxygen that this ZOT-bait breathes


43 posted on 08/07/2009 3:51:03 PM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nomad
he does make a valid point about the Republicratic push towards State-ism

It's true he had some points but he really lost me at running Ron Paul, among other things.

44 posted on 08/07/2009 3:51:09 PM PDT by paulycy (Screw the RACErs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

45 posted on 08/07/2009 3:51:24 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Ez 38 Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert
No politicians. Either we get a real person on the ticket, or vote third party.

And just who do you think makes up third parties? Politicians, that's who!

Try again.

46 posted on 08/07/2009 3:51:43 PM PDT by SandyInSeattle (What came first? The word, or the thought behind the word?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Thank you. Well written. I was being glib in #21, you said what needed to be said.


47 posted on 08/07/2009 3:51:44 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Coming soon to a thread near you.

48 posted on 08/07/2009 3:52:52 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom

We’re waiting!


49 posted on 08/07/2009 3:52:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Stephen Colbert

Steven Colbert signed on to Free Republic 7/31/2009

HOW WONDERFUL YOU GIVE US SUCH A VALUED PERSPECTIVE AS A NEWBIE!!

Any other literary creations on the horizon?


50 posted on 08/07/2009 3:53:19 PM PDT by o_zarkman44 (Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson