[whattajoke]

Psst - one can never “prove” a negative. As such, one can never honestly reject the claim of a deity’s existence 100%.

Dawkins is being consistent.

[pnh102]

Psst - one can never “prove” a negative. As such, one can never honestly reject the claim of a deity’s existence 100%.

That is incorrect. If you are knowledgeable in set theory you can easily and conclusively prove negatives. I am simply stating that Dawkins is no different than any other believer since he cannot prove his claims.

I also find it laughable that he himself can't prove what he believes, even though he believes that proof should be the foundation of one's belief.