Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House trims jet requests after Pentagon criticism
Market Watch ^ | August 10, 2009 | Rex Crum & Christopher Hinton

Posted on 08/10/2009 10:46:59 PM PDT by DennisR

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Facing controversy over a plan to use taxpayer money to purchase new aircraft for the U.S. government officials, the House of Representatives said late Monday that it would cut back its spending plans by more than $100 million.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 111th; defensespending; house; jets; murtha; pelosi; usaf
Wow...cutting back by $100 million. "Chump change." Hey, Congress, why not do some REAL cutting?

Love this from Murtha:

The Journal reported that Rep. John Murtha (D.-Penn.), the chairman of the House panel that was seeking the aircraft order, said that if the Department of Defense decides it doesn't want to purchase the aircraft, "they will be eliminated from the bill."

What a gutless wonder. No wonder we are in such fiscal trouble with these idiots running things.

The Journal reported that Rep. John Murtha (D.-Penn.), the chairman of the House panel that was seeking the aircraft order, said that if the Department of Defense decides it doesn't want to purchase the aircraft, "they will be eliminated from the bill."

1 posted on 08/10/2009 10:47:00 PM PDT by DennisR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DennisR

So first it was going to be a $250M order, then they doubled it to $500M, now thy are cutting it back to $400M and calling it a savings.

And they have to do it RIGHT NOW, when everyone is furious about the staggering amount of money they’re spending, and the deathcare bill they’re forcing on everyone EXCEPT themselves.

LOL, keep it up, geniuses.


2 posted on 08/10/2009 10:56:29 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

The request went from $220 M to $550M and now its being “cut” to $440M??

Thats some cut from 220m to 440m


3 posted on 08/10/2009 10:57:31 PM PDT by GeronL (http://unitedcitizen.blogspot -Guilty of deviationism- http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
Do they make a Mach II broom? Nancy Pelosi would be familiar with the flying machine. :)
4 posted on 08/10/2009 11:15:04 PM PDT by cpdiii (roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

These $hitbag hypocrital politicians should tell us what kind of carbon footprint these jets leave while they debate the finer points of cap & trade.


5 posted on 08/10/2009 11:15:42 PM PDT by Anti-Kenyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Kenyan

Environmental Impact Statement?


6 posted on 08/10/2009 11:17:20 PM PDT by GeronL (http://unitedcitizen.blogspot -Guilty of deviationism- http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

I would rather see my tax dollars going to buying new jets then any of that bull that Nobama is pushing for...


7 posted on 08/10/2009 11:21:28 PM PDT by AZGunner1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZGunner1911

“JUST SAY NO IN 2010”

TURN ALL THESE LOSERS OUT ON THEIR EARS - THEIR TIN EARS ANYWAY! THEY HAVE STOPPED LISTENING TO AMERICAN VOTERS,
SO IT IS TIME TO SHOW THEM THE DOOR!


8 posted on 08/10/2009 11:45:14 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

He found out that he couldn’t fit one of the aircraft in his personal hanger.


9 posted on 08/10/2009 11:48:44 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

They're pretty nice if you've got a hot date or you just hate flying commercial.

10 posted on 08/11/2009 12:54:17 AM PDT by Daaave ("Where it all ends I can't fathom my friends")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

You mean “criticism” works?


11 posted on 08/11/2009 3:11:28 AM PDT by Dallas59 (Hows My Posting? Please Contact flag@whitehouse.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Let them fly coach.


12 posted on 08/11/2009 3:48:04 AM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

“after Pentagon criticism”?

Try PUBLIC criticism!


13 posted on 08/11/2009 6:32:51 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

This is called “Insane Congressional Mathematics” (”ICM”). For example, you make the cost insanely high, then have to “cut” it. Although insane, it makes you look good. You can also spend trillions of dollars trying to get your country out of debt. I am sure you see how ICM works.

Congress is insane!

http://pushbackuntil.com!


14 posted on 08/11/2009 7:22:13 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable, and unambiguous clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson