Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New browser red-flags disputed facts on the web
Canadian Press ^ | 29 Aug 2009 | James Keller

Posted on 08/31/2009 3:34:53 PM PDT by BGHater

Developers of new web browsing software that flags questionable claims or outright lies on the web hope it will become a valuable tool to deal with the misinformation that litters the Internet.

But observers say Dispute Finder, an experimental browser extension developed by Intel, and the many websites that already aim to debunk online rumours and falsehoods face an enormous task. It isn't as easy as simply telling someone they're wrong.

Once installed, Dispute Finder highlights in red what it determines are disputed claims on websites, then offers users links to alternative points of view and evidence to back them up.

"It's important to be aware when something you're reading is not the only opinion, when there is another point of view worth paying attention to," says California-based Intel researcher Rob Ennals.

"The real problem is, when you don't realize something is disputed, you don't realize there are other points of view and you might not be aware you've wandered into a dispute."

The current version of the software relies entirely on users to identify disputed claims, provide evidence and point the software to other instances of that claim on the web, so right now there's still not much content being highlighted.

Eventually, Ennals says users who input claims will be able to train the software to seek out examples and continue to flag new content as it's posted. And, as the software becomes more popular, more claims will be catalogued.

He says real people are in a better position to determine whether a claim is in dispute than any computer and he brushes aside suggestions that doing so might just provide another forum for bogus assertions.

"The good thing is that if something is disputed enough that people will care, the chances are that someone is going to care enough to mark it as disputed," says Ennals.

"I don't think we can really be the arbiters of truth, we can't tell you automatically what is true and what is false. All we can really hope to do is, if there's a credible source that gives a credible point of view, let you know."

There already are a number of websites that attempt to poke holes in fiction masquerading as fact, such as Snopes.com and FactCheck.org. Media outlets have done so-called "reality-check" stories to assess claims in the news for years.

However, Jonathan Fugelsang, an expert in cognitive psychology at the University of Waterloo, says it's incredibly difficult to change people's minds once they've decided a certain claim is a fact.

"Once you actually believe something, it takes quite a lot of data or evidence to overcome that belief and it takes a lot of attention to do that," says Fugelsang.

"With a lot of repeat exposures, it does change."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Society
KEYWORDS: browser; gigo; intel; internet

1 posted on 08/31/2009 3:34:53 PM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Then the White Crib website will be all red? As if it isn’t already?


2 posted on 08/31/2009 3:36:35 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

It will not work.. People and not software will ultimately have to decide based on the evidence, facts and logic.


3 posted on 08/31/2009 3:38:53 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

It wil become a LEFTIST tool of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!


4 posted on 08/31/2009 3:39:14 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
> Dispute Finder, an experimental browser extension developed by Intel

I'm guessing it will
immediately flag all
AMD chip claims...

5 posted on 08/31/2009 3:39:46 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

LOL! On the comment of “The White Crib”.


6 posted on 08/31/2009 3:39:48 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Total idiocy. There won’t be a single site that has not been “flagged,” countless times. And when/if 1 flag goes away, another will take it’s place.

Even the url will get flagged.


7 posted on 08/31/2009 3:40:44 PM PDT by justkate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

You got it. It’s designed for uniformed people to be easily manipulated, indoctrinated, and ultimately sheeple.


8 posted on 08/31/2009 3:41:03 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I already own this utility.It’s called a brain


9 posted on 08/31/2009 3:41:17 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Buck Ofama!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“There already are a number of websites that attempt to poke holes in fiction masquerading as fact, such as Snopes.com and FactCheck.org. Media outlets have done so-called “reality-check” stories to assess claims in the news for years.”

Oh, yes. They’re very reliable. As is Wikipedia.
For information like largest islands* and tallest peaks*. Provided you look at them at a slant.

* and even those factoids are not agreed upon.

Dispute Finder will be a tool according to the views of who operate it and will thus be disputed as well.


10 posted on 08/31/2009 3:41:57 PM PDT by Sparko (Obama & czars: castrating Congress, perverting the Constitution, and emptying our wallets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

So when you say po-tay-to and I say po-tah-to...it will be in red letters? Oh, goody...I hope that’s a feature that will be installed everywhere and can’t (or cahn’t) be removed by anyone...finally, the primary use of the internet for mass debating will be official...


11 posted on 08/31/2009 3:42:46 PM PDT by jessduntno ("Integrity is the lifeblood of democracy. Deceit is a poison in it." - Ted Kennedy (D-HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"It's important to be aware when something you're reading is not the only opinion, when there is another point of view worth paying attention to," says California-based Intel researcher Rob Ennals.

That simply is not true.

"The real problem is, when you don't realize something is disputed, you don't realize there are other points of view and you might not be aware you've wandered into a dispute."

Pure hogwash.

"The good thing is that if something is disputed enough that people will care, the chances are that someone is going to care enough to mark it as disputed," says Ennals.

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

"I don't think we can really be the arbiters of truth, we can't tell you automatically what is true and what is false. All we can really hope to do is, if there's a credible source that gives a credible point of view, let you know."

Balderdash! "Once you actually believe something, it takes quite a lot of data or evidence to overcome that belief and it takes a lot of attention to do that," says Fugelsang.

Utterly ridiculous.

"With a lot of repeat exposures, it does change."

Liar! Liar! You creepy liar!
12 posted on 08/31/2009 3:43:39 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Carbon Dioxide is NOT POLLUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
There already are a number of websites that attempt to poke holes in fiction masquerading as fact...

Free Republic is my current fav.

13 posted on 08/31/2009 3:46:52 PM PDT by justkate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
An argument's not
simply denying something
somebody asserts!

14 posted on 08/31/2009 3:47:23 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Yes it is!


15 posted on 08/31/2009 3:48:12 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Carbon Dioxide is NOT POLLUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: justkate
>There already are a number of websites that attempt to poke holes in fiction masquerading as fact...
>>Free Republic is my current fav

History Unfolding
16 posted on 08/31/2009 3:48:50 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
"I already own this utility. It’s called a brain"


bttt


Besides, we lost control over content years ago with the first gopher utilities. Remember these?



or an earlier version:




17 posted on 08/31/2009 3:53:57 PM PDT by Sparko (Obama & czars: castrating Congress, perverting the Constitution, and emptying our wallets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
>Yes it is!

Can't argue, I'm off
to meet a woman and get
yelled at for an hour.

18 posted on 08/31/2009 3:56:35 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

TY for the link...I hadn’t see that post.

I’ve been reading early 20th poetry again & honestly believe we are living the final epic battle for Mankind’s soul.


19 posted on 08/31/2009 4:15:34 PM PDT by justkate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

I’m sensing some skepticism on your part regarding this.


20 posted on 08/31/2009 4:16:48 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
Just lemme just make a wild guess here, this Rob Ennals from Intel is a hard core 0bama supporter, thinks that all those protesting against 0bamacare are spreading “disinformation”, and has probably been working closely with 0bama’s shadowy, frightening, thought control “czar” Cass Sunstein.
21 posted on 08/31/2009 4:22:04 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Is there anything worth in this world that is not in dispute?


22 posted on 08/31/2009 4:35:21 PM PDT by paudio (Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Good idea. Just have the browser check the factcheck.org website, snopes or maybe wikipedia.


23 posted on 08/31/2009 6:38:21 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

There are already perfectly good urban-legend fact-check sites like Snopes.


24 posted on 09/01/2009 6:56:51 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson