Skip to comments.Confirmed DOS @ DefendGlenn.com
Posted on 09/06/2009 5:54:07 PM PDT by rvoitier
Just got tweeted
He must mean a “denial of service” attack on defendglenn.com...try it:
A successful DOS attack will limit or completely block access to the site.
But the site works......
Sight is up, I had no problems.
I got right in, second time today.
No problems here ...
There's an ointment for that.
Others may want to chime in.
This doesn’t mean the DOS attack is happening right now.
The Twit says that it happened right after Jones’ resignation, this morning.
Not sure why this is news.
A DOS attack was attempted but "failed."
I felt funny writing it! lol
The malware that’s on most of your computers can turn your PC into a ‘zombie’ controlled in the background by hackers who aim all of their ‘zombies’ at a given site.
This overwhelms the server/computer hosting the site (too many call coming in to the switchboard) and the site cannot be sent to you for viewing.
In short, “No site for you!”
A denial-of-service attack (DoS attack) or distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS attack) is an attempt to make a computer resource unavailable to its intended users. Although the means to carry out, motives for, and targets of a DoS attack may vary, it generally consists of the concerted efforts of a person or people to prevent an Internet site or service from functioning efficiently or at all, temporarily or indefinitely. Perpetrators of DoS attacks typically target sites or services hosted on high-profile web servers such as banks, credit card payment gateways, and even root nameservers.
One common method of attack involves saturating the target (victim) machine with external communications requests, such that it cannot respond to legitimate traffic, or responds so slowly as to be rendered effectively unavailable. In general terms, DoS attacks are implemented by either forcing the targeted computer(s) to reset, or consuming its resources so that it can no longer provide its intended service or obstructing the communication media between the intended users and the victim so that they can no longer communicate adequately.
I was thinking that someone was tweeting you to death on Twitter... :-)
who started that site anyway? I am always weary of sites that pop up-—I would not put it past the left to come up with sites like these to lure us to give info and add us to their target list. Anyone know who sponsors that site? Sorry, I am sure most of you feel the same, it is hard to trust anything these days when it comes to those that oppose the annointed one.
Content of tweets
San Antonio-based market research firm Pear Analytics analyzed 2,000 tweets (originating from the US and in English) over a 2-week period from 11:00a to 5:00p (CST) and separated them into six categories::
The firm found that "pointless babble" accounted for most of Twitter's content making up 811 tweets or 40.55 percent of the total number of messages sampled.
Conversational messages accounted for 751 messages or 37.55 percent, tweets with "pass-along value" i.e. retweets accounted for 174 messages or 8.70 percent, self-promotion by companies made up 117 tweets or 5.85 percent, spam was 75 tweets or 3.75 percent and tweets with news from mainstream media publications accounted for 72 tweets or 3.60 percent.
Wikipedia link ...
Earlier in its inception, it was hacked and the “Defend Glenn” wall, when you attempted to enter, sent you to “Common dreams” website.
I would rather get meowed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.