Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Early Show: Michelle Obama ‘Stealth Weapon’ In Health Care Debate
Newsbusters.org ^ | 9-18-09 | Kyle Drennen

Posted on 09/18/2009 2:39:36 PM PDT by Justaham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: COUNTrecount
I'm sure the people want another liberal telling them what's good for them. Bill Plant must be an idiot if he thinks we want to be browbeat by Michelle Obama.
21 posted on 09/18/2009 2:54:30 PM PDT by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Justaham

Michelle gives new reason current healthcare for women in “unacceptable”: women are “crushed” because they often are responsible for taking care of family illnesses, arranging checkups and monitoring follow-up care. Just paying the doctor bills is “unacceptable”.

Men - we gotta think of something we’re crushed by. We die younger. That is unacceptable.


23 posted on 09/18/2009 3:01:01 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Michelle Obama will be more like a stealth weapon in the battle for health care, giving it a softer touch."

yet,still

less pay = fewer doctors

fewer doctors + more patients = more rationing + lower quality

24 posted on 09/18/2009 3:05:15 PM PDT by mjp (pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, independence, limited government, capitalism})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Stealth weapon? Uh oh..


25 posted on 09/18/2009 3:08:28 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frposty

I heard her speech and it left me disgusted.

Most stay at home moms have a job to do, and Its called being a Mom. Some poor shmuck is working to get the benefits to pay for it, in an econmy being destroyd by her a$$wipe huspand, and Michelle has no respect for that.

Her speech is designd to divide.

GFY Michelle.


26 posted on 09/18/2009 3:12:40 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Do you think she will do a better job then Hillary did? I mean at least Michelle is wearing that “bondage belt”
**See Drudge... top left right now
“MICHELLE SHOWS OFF ‘BONDAGE BELT’...”


27 posted on 09/18/2009 3:13:09 PM PDT by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

I just threw up in my waste paper basket can ...

What is this - a “twofer”, like we got with Bill and Hill ???

We all know how THAT went ...


28 posted on 09/18/2009 3:14:10 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Bill Plante should change his first name to White House.

***

Or Plante (my lips on Obama’s butt) ...


29 posted on 09/18/2009 3:15:24 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

ammo belt? LOL.......drudge headline is calling it a bondage belt. if SNL was doing it’s job they could have a FIELD DAY with dressing MO.....too bad they are cowards.


30 posted on 09/18/2009 3:18:47 PM PDT by tioga (Drip, Drip, Drip.......the ACORNS are falling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Oh yeah, the Black Jackie O (as they repeated in Greek Chorus fashion all summer) is going to turn the tide.

This is exactly the problem described here.

Proverbs 30:

21“Under three things the earth trembles,
under four it cannot bear up:
22 a servant who becomes king, a fool who is full of food,
23 an unloved woman who is married,
and a maidservant who displaces her mistress.

Is Michelle Larry Sinclair's replacement?


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

31 posted on 09/18/2009 3:22:22 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga

At first glance I thought those were two belts she’s wearing. Ruffled top, a sweater, busy prints on the skirt and a belt that fits too high at the waist, someone please get her a mirror.


32 posted on 09/18/2009 3:26:31 PM PDT by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: psjones

If I were First Lady, I would wear tailored suits in different shades.....solid colars, subtle classy accessories......tasteful shoes.....with the kind of money she has to dress herself she is a shameful mess.


33 posted on 09/18/2009 3:30:18 PM PDT by tioga (Drip, Drip, Drip.......the ACORNS are falling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kalee

see post 14. look up, ‘BUFF’, (in relation to the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress.) it will all be revealed!


34 posted on 09/18/2009 3:30:51 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

People did not like Hillary butting in policy. I don’t think they’re going to like Michelle.


35 posted on 09/18/2009 3:31:39 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

wouldn’t this imply she couldn’t be seen???


36 posted on 09/18/2009 4:20:24 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Stealthy? With the clothes she wears , she’s about as stealthy as neon lights in Vegas.


37 posted on 09/18/2009 4:35:18 PM PDT by RetSignman (Townhalls ..."We have seen the Patriots and they are us")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

lulz, she will definately become one failed ‘stealth weapon’ in the US weapons inventory....


38 posted on 09/18/2009 5:36:20 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frposty

Excuse me for replying to my own post, but here’s how we men can overcome “we die younger”. But before explaining that I’ve realized why our healthcare system is going bankrupt: old women. Overcoming “we die younger” should be a piece of cake for the death panels.


39 posted on 09/18/2009 6:12:15 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
MO has laid low on political issues until now. She's been mostly doing the "First Lady" thing. So why jump into the fray now?

Desperation.

It was a few short months ago, BO himself was laying fairly low on Health Care and some democrats were grumbling that he should use some of his political capital to "enter the fray". Well, he's now front and center and his numbers dove. So, now they want Michelle to enter the fray and spend some of her "capital". The only reason she has decent "First Lady" numbers is because she has stayed out of politics since BO became President. Now that she is entering the ring, she is fair game. Rush went after her today. Michelle Malkin is going after her, and MO's numbers will be the next to take a dive.

Again, this is desperation. Perhaps they are hoping that MO will get attacked, and then BO can whine "leave my family alone!" and hope to get some sympathy.

I think it's a high risk gamble with very low potential for a payoff for the democrats, but very high possibility for it to be a negative. The more MO talks, the more likely she is to say something really stupid, divisive, and controversial. Then, the discussion will be about her, and not about health care.

Think about it. What are the odds that MO will inspire a turn around for BO in the health care debate? Less than 1%? LOL What are the odds she will stick her size 12 foot in her mouth and have to be put sent back to her garden? 50%+?

Meanwhile, wouldn't you love to know what's going on in HRC's mind seeing Michelle? Probably something like "Honey, if I couldn't package it and sell it, you haven't got a snowball's chance in hell!"
40 posted on 09/18/2009 6:42:32 PM PDT by GLDNGUN (PALIN/GINGRICH 2012 since 7/04/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson