Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganez
No, they haven't. There are certain exceptions to the rule, but they amount to a level that isn't statistically significant. Plus, they have only really been able enforce it strictly on Han Chinese.

Not stand by as their population implodes? Even if they acted with great panic tomorrow, they are way too late.

20 posted on 09/20/2009 11:26:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Yes, they have.

Their population will not implode.

My guess is they are aiming to stablize at 750m.

If you want to call that implosion so be it.

But 1.5B is unmanable long term.


23 posted on 09/21/2009 12:18:58 AM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I just re-read your original post.

China’s population is aproximatley 1B?

Please it is at least 1.3B and probably closer to 1.5B.

Like all Chinese statistics, they are based on lies.

Local leaders do not want to admit they missed their population goals and consistently skewer lower to meat their goal of low birth rates.

It happens at every level of bureacracy.

24 posted on 09/21/2009 12:22:56 AM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson