Skip to comments.Dancing elephant statue stays, says Calgary Zoo
Posted on 09/26/2009 12:01:04 AM PDT by Daffynition
The Calgary Zoo said it has no plans to remove a dancing elephant statue after a complaint from a Christian group that it's an inappropriate religious icon.
A private donor gave the statue, modeled after the Hindu god Ganesh, to the zoo in 2006 to stand in front of the Asian elephant exhibit.
As CBC News first reported, Concerned Christians Canada sent a letter raising its concerns that the statue was "selective religious partiality" to the zoo on Thursday.
"A lot of people are saying we're being intolerant. I don't consider asking that the zoo look at this from a balanced perspective being intolerant," said national chairman Jim Blake on Friday.
Zoo officials said the three-metre-tall statue has no religious symbols and is meant to simply show the link between elephants and Asian culture.
"Our desire in putting the statue here was to demonstrate to our visitors the connection between cultures and animals, much like the same way the bald eagle for example depicts the American culture, the lion Britain, the beaver Canada," explained Grahame Newton, the zoo's director of corporate services, on Friday.
'Handful' of complaints
Newton said the zoo received a "handful" of complaints when the statue was first erected.
"We tried to explain to them the tie-in with the culture and that it was not a religious symbol and that seemed to fade pretty quickly. We didn't hear much after that. We didn't hear anything after that until this most recent situation," Newton said.
Blake, who lives in Calgary, said the zoo should be neutral on matters of religion because it's a non-profit group that receives public funding.
"It's supposed to be about animals. It's supposed to be about teaching people about their different habitats," Blake told CBC News on Friday.
"But I don't believe that it's a place of religious worship, or a place of displaying religious icons. There's a place for that: temples and synagogues and churches and things like that. But the zoo is not a place of religious expression." Statue popular with visitors
Many visitors to the zoo on Friday stopped to pose for photos in front of the statue.
"We like it. We think it's cute," said Angie Thomshaw, who was visiting with her children. "That's never even crossed our minds. And I'm Christian. We're a Christian family and it doesn't offend us."
Tinu Ruparell, a professor of religious studies at the University of Calgary, called the complaint by Blake's organization "unfortunate."
"To pick this one out and say this is of a foreign god is to mistake or not to look at all the other architecture, the symbols, the stuff that we are so used to in Canada we've kind of forgotten where they come from which is usually a religious place," he said.
The zoo hosts carols and a light display at Christmas, as well as events at Easter.
The elephant statue was donated by a woman who wanted to honour the memory of her late father, said Newton.
Cute statue. Seems perfect for a zoo.
I would support the Christian group but I think the statute is pretty harmless and not too Hindu.
Statue doesn’t bother me but I’m not Albertian
But I'd be hesitant if it were a camel wearing a bomb best.
Maybe I'll sculpt a statue of a jackass with teleprompters and donate that to their collection.
Half tempted to save that image, just in case I ever get a Republican congress-critter who cuts his own office budget rather than spending federal money faster than Ted Kennedy on a bender.
May be it’s more of a religious zealots thing, than a nationality thing.
This is a result of people who romanticize other cultures, and consider them simply ‘cute’. Liberals sometimes forget that some statues symbolize religious icons that akin to putting a statue in Christian tradition. Ask them to put the statue of Patmos Eagle.
Its pretty funny. How could somebody not like it? Stuffed shirts.
For crying out loud. These folks are as bad as the offended Muslims or offended atheists.
"Power to the Pachyderms!"
No they're not.
Muslims would have killed somebody and the atheists would have compelled removal by the courts.
Nice try, though.
It’s idolatry damn it, heathens ! Better ?
I'm still suffering from 'the elephant in the room syndrome'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.