Skip to comments.
Whether You Like it or Not - California Will Legalize Pot Next Year
cbs47 ^
| 9-27-09
| cakid1
Posted on 09/27/2009 2:36:52 PM PDT by cakid1
Whether You Like it or Not - California Will Legalize Pot Next Year
(That seems to be the idea behind a new article out today)
According to a well known, and outspoken leader from the left its a good bet that the state will legalize Pot next year.
Part of the reason?
The state needs...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: brainondrugs; ca2010; dopers; leggalizepot; maryjane; potheads; reefer; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 501-546 next last
The petitions to put it on the ballot next year just got the okay..
1
posted on
09/27/2009 2:36:53 PM PDT
by
cakid1
To: cakid1
To: cakid1
Well, I live in N.C. and that is their business.
3
posted on
09/27/2009 2:38:28 PM PDT
by
rsobin
To: cakid1
The state needs...
DA MONEY!
4
posted on
09/27/2009 2:38:32 PM PDT
by
CommieCutter
(http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs/ht/qt/3013_08.html)
To: cakid1
California went to pot decades ago.
5
posted on
09/27/2009 2:38:37 PM PDT
by
Nosterrex
To: cakid1
Great. Now every lazy, deadbeat, RAT voter will move here.
The only possible good thing I can see coming out of this is the rest of the states seeing just how stupid a move this is and avoid doing it themselves.
6
posted on
09/27/2009 2:40:25 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: cakid1
About time. Let’s end the drug war, finally.
7
posted on
09/27/2009 2:40:40 PM PDT
by
wireplay
To: cakid1
8
posted on
09/27/2009 2:41:28 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: cakid1
Who cares?
Um what was this post about again?
9
posted on
09/27/2009 2:41:39 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: cakid1
Then California gets to see if Federal Law trumps State Law.
To: cakid1
Um what was this post about again? Um what was this post thread about again?
11
posted on
09/27/2009 2:42:18 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: cakid1
There is just too much money to be made both by the people who grow marijuana and the cities and counties that would be able to tax it.
Willie BrownIdiot. Why would people pay tax for something they are currently getting tax free?
12
posted on
09/27/2009 2:42:43 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: cakid1
BTW - are you going to finish that brownie?
13
posted on
09/27/2009 2:42:56 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: wireplay
About time. Lets end the drug war, finally.Don't hold your breath. (your hit, maybe)
14
posted on
09/27/2009 2:44:11 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Don't let history record that, when faced with evil, you did nothing!)
To: Texas Eagle
Will the state only allow the government to oversee the growing of the marijuana? Or will you be able to grow it in your closet?
15
posted on
09/27/2009 2:45:58 PM PDT
by
LukeL
(Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
To: BulletBobCo
Then California gets to see if Federal Law trumps State Law. With Obama in the White House, you're kidding, right?

-PJ
16
posted on
09/27/2009 2:46:20 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(Comprehensive congressional reform legislation only yields incomprehensible bills that nobody reads.)
To: rsobin
Same here,it’s their business.
Financial news update:
Buy stock in Moonpies.
To: Texas Eagle
Exactly.
Then I want every surrender monkey on the WOD to see what idiots they are.
To: LukeL
Will the state only allow the government to oversee the growing of the marijuana? Or will you be able to grow it in your closet?Hmmmmmm.....gee, I guess we'll have to pass a bunch of new laws to address this and the many other questions that will inevitably rear their ugly heads.
19
posted on
09/27/2009 2:47:12 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: airborne
I don’t use pot but ill roll that cigar smoke in my mouth right now a little longer.
20
posted on
09/27/2009 2:48:39 PM PDT
by
wireplay
To: cakid1
I think this is great. Maybe now all the Californians living in Arizona will go the hell home and take their communist politics with them.
21
posted on
09/27/2009 2:49:16 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
To: Texas Eagle
I doubt that, how would they be able to afford it?
22
posted on
09/27/2009 2:49:22 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: Texas Eagle
Also how will it be regulated? Will there be zero tolerance for driving while high? How about smoking around children? How will you tax it? Where can you sell it?
There is something called the Law of Unintended Consequences and this will be a great example of it.
23
posted on
09/27/2009 2:50:01 PM PDT
by
LukeL
(Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
To: cakid1
Why don’t they just do an Omnibus Bill:
One that legalizes pot/same-sex_marriage/abortion_on_demand_up_to_age_13
24
posted on
09/27/2009 2:50:30 PM PDT
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: Texas Eagle
Idiot. Why would people pay tax for something they are currently getting tax free?
__________________________________________________
I’ve been asking pro-dope libertarians that for years. Why are liberaltarians so anxious to increase taxes and grow the government to even greater proportions?
Immoral dopeheads; the lot of ‘em.
To: cakid1
whipee.
Won’t solve any of their problems.
Will it be illegal to grow it? I guess they’ll have to raid homes to stop that from happening.
26
posted on
09/27/2009 2:51:20 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Texas Eagle
“Great. Now every lazy, deadbeat, RAT voter will move here.”
Yes but think how that will help Republicans (hopefully conservatives) in the rest of the nation.
To: wireplay
It will still be illegal to grow it. Probably only the state will be able to sell it legally.
28
posted on
09/27/2009 2:52:13 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: FlingWingFlyer
Here, here. I’m in for that ...
“Fruits and nuts, your Hemp Bowl is calling you. Time to grift your way home.”
29
posted on
09/27/2009 2:53:43 PM PDT
by
webschooner
(First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win -- Mahatma Gandhi)
To: cakid1
Don’t care. Any waste case who wants weed is already getting all he can use. The social harm from making it illegal outweighs any direct damage it causes. I want the Feds to keep their noses out of it too.
30
posted on
09/27/2009 2:54:42 PM PDT
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: Bon mots
Um what was this post about again? Doritos?
31
posted on
09/27/2009 2:54:58 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
To: GeronL
Legalize use is a stepping stone (no pun intended). Colorado already effectively legalizes. Grow rights should be the case by default but 1 step is better than 0 tolerance.
32
posted on
09/27/2009 2:56:15 PM PDT
by
wireplay
To: cakid1
This just means the DEA can establish their headquarters in Sacramento and start manufacturing drug criminals by the thousands every week.
33
posted on
09/27/2009 2:56:21 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
To: cakid1
Okay...no more business with California, and eject all California refugees back to where they came from.
34
posted on
09/27/2009 2:58:20 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
To: Texas Eagle
Wait until they see how much pot will cost them when they have to pay the tax on it. Growing your own will be illegal, and all new laws will have to be created and enforced regarding black market marijuana.
35
posted on
09/27/2009 3:02:41 PM PDT
by
Toespi
To: cakid1
There was recent libertarian Californian Ideology news and glee that Mexico is legalizing marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and the like. California will make a fitting new state for Mexico. Adios, Californica! ...wouldn't wanna be ya!
36
posted on
09/27/2009 3:04:17 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
To: cakid1
What about pot for the needy? Will there be pot food stamps?
37
posted on
09/27/2009 3:04:28 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: wireplay
Alaska has always had legal pot...something no one ever seems to remember.
38
posted on
09/27/2009 3:05:29 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: Responsibility2nd
Immoral dopeheads; the lot of em. I don't touch any drug except an occasional glass of wine, but I have worked in a psych hospital and seen the downside of every kind of legal and illegal drug.
The fact is that there is absolutely no comparison: Alcohol is far more dangerous and destructive than marijuana in every single way you can measure. Alcohol is probably the third or fourth worst drug out there (after PCP, amphetamines, and perhaps opiates.) I think that cocaine is in general not as dangerous as alcohol, and that even the opiates are running neck and neck with the booze. Marijuana is probably the safest strongly psychoactive substance known to mankind.
We have come to a societal accommodation with booze, taxing it and regulating it heavily, and we ought to be able to do the same with pot. Taxes will go up, but the overall cost of the material will go way way down, reducing the criminality associated with its production, distribution, and usage. Money that used to go to violent Mexican drug gangs will instead go to the state. With the stuff so much cheaper, there will be no need to commit burglaries or robberies to get enough money to buy it.
Moreover, with legalization there will be less pressure for draconian laws that rob us of our ancient Saxon liberties, pothead and teetotaler alike. All true conservatives should support this.
-ccm
39
posted on
09/27/2009 3:10:02 PM PDT
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
"I think this is great. Maybe now all the Californians living in Arizona will go the hell home and take their communist politics with them."
But the Mexican border fence will have to go around the east and north sides of California, after we send them all back there. And we'll have to pay for that fence, 'cause they won't work for anything. ;-)
40
posted on
09/27/2009 3:10:55 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
To: Texas Eagle
And why would sellers (who are breaking the law now), want to do the paperwork and pay the taxes? Why not continue breaking the law?
Their logic escapes me....
hh
41
posted on
09/27/2009 3:12:21 PM PDT
by
hoosier hick
(Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
To: cakid1
Jerry the fairy don’t have anything to say about it!
42
posted on
09/27/2009 3:15:55 PM PDT
by
dalereed
To: ccmay
While what you said about marijuana may be true, legalization will not stop there. Proponents will clamor for legalized cocaine, meth and on and on.
And if harder drugs are not de-criminalized, then the cartels will happily continue on in their assault on America.
This Nation can NOT surrender in the WOD. California may lose the battle over marijuana, but it will be at their own peril.
To: cakid1
The Nanny State Sycophants will not be amused.
44
posted on
09/27/2009 3:18:13 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: ccmay
"The fact is that there is absolutely no comparison: Alcohol is far more dangerous and destructive than marijuana in every single way you can measure. Alcohol is probably the third or fourth worst drug out there (after PCP, amphetamines, and perhaps opiates.)"
The dishonest behind that old tale is obvious to the rest of us. We know how the bipolars, the depressed and the Xanax ho's got started. Most of us are also aware that most of the alcoholics drink in order to soothe the initial paranoia in their pot high.
Marijuana is the most common tool for inducting working class young people into slavery.
45
posted on
09/27/2009 3:18:20 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
To: cakid1
To: ccmay
...the dishonesty behind that old tale, even.
47
posted on
09/27/2009 3:19:17 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
To: cakid1
I am adamantly for or against almost any controversial issue, but on this one...ho hum. Would I try pot if it were completely legal? Haven’t decided.
48
posted on
09/27/2009 3:19:46 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
To: ccmay
I agree with you word for word down to my former employment in a psy. hospital and my occasional glass of wine.
49
posted on
09/27/2009 3:22:45 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: cakid1
I like it....I LIIIIIIIIIKE IT! :-)
50
posted on
09/27/2009 3:31:14 PM PDT
by
ChrisInAR
(The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 501-546 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson