Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate
NYTimes ^ | 10/12/09 | Dennis Overbye

Posted on 10/13/2009 1:13:12 AM PDT by LibWhacker

More than a year after an explosion of sparks, soot and frigid helium shut it down, the world’s biggest and most expensive physics experiment, known as the Large Hadron Collider, is poised to start up again. In December, if all goes well, protons will start smashing together in an underground racetrack outside Geneva in a search for forces and particles that reigned during the first trillionth of a second of the Big Bang.

Then it will be time to test one of the most bizarre and revolutionary theories in science. I’m not talking about extra dimensions of space-time, dark matter or even black holes that eat the Earth. No, I’m talking about the notion that the troubled collider is being sabotaged by its own future. A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: blackholes; collider; fate; geneva; genevacell; hadron; hadroncollider; higgsboson; largehadroncollider; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: allmost
I think the guy sounds like a quack with this theory.

Maybe he's just trying to get a grant. We'll know in a decade or three.

21 posted on 10/13/2009 2:02:25 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

I’m a believer. My Little Killer cat reminds me of her reality every time she ambushes me. It seems to be her hobby.


22 posted on 10/13/2009 2:04:23 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

One problem with this idea is that some ultra-high energy proton collisions in the upper atmosphere far exceed what might be eventually attained by this terrestrial collider. It’s too bad we can’t somehow contain and analyze some of these collisions. Then we wouldn’t even have to build this machine.


23 posted on 10/13/2009 6:54:04 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
It’s too bad we can’t somehow contain and analyze some of these collisions.

Yet. We can't do that yet. :)
24 posted on 10/14/2009 9:13:30 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here are the two to blame for this....


25 posted on 10/19/2009 10:58:29 PM PDT by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson