Had you seen the game you would have known UF fumbled four times, three in the redzone. That sort of flies in the face of your conjecture that UF had no significant drives that day, before the game tying drive.
UF moved the ball pretty much at will against UAR. UF punted 3 times while UAR punted 7 times. So I think UF fans were not worried about moving the ball that drive, but rather holding on to the ball in the redzone.
Basically this whole thread is another case of loser crying and winners for the most part moving on.
I saw most of the game. And UF sucked. My point stands - the drive on which they tied the game was made possible by the two penalties - that is what made it a significant drive - they actually scored a touchdown.
And like I said, I don't have a dog in this hunt. But I know biased refs when I see them.