Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does the "7" Mean in Windows "7"?
Microsoft ^ | 10/20/2009 | Microsoft

Posted on 10/23/2009 6:06:28 PM PDT by CJacobs

Time for some humor on the subject matter. I know my fellow IT Geeks will be good at this one.

What does the "7" mean in Windows "7"?

7: The year it was supposed to be released (2007). 7: The number of hours it will take to upgrade. 7: How much companies will have to multiply their IT staff for support. 7: The average quantity of software you had that won't work in "7". 7: The number of crashes you will expect each day. 7: The months it will take Microsoft to patch half of the security leaks. 7: The number of days in a week that you curse the new operating system.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Humor
KEYWORDS: computers; humor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
Throw out your ideas.
1 posted on 10/23/2009 6:06:28 PM PDT by CJacobs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

Lucky number because Gates is hoping this one is better than Windows ME or Vista.


2 posted on 10/23/2009 6:08:26 PM PDT by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013 The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Windows version 7?


3 posted on 10/23/2009 6:11:00 PM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
The months it will take Microsoft to patch half of the security leaks.

If history is any barometer, seven years would be closer. ;-)

4 posted on 10/23/2009 6:11:08 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

“S L O W - D O W N!”


5 posted on 10/23/2009 6:13:08 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

The seventh major version of the software.


6 posted on 10/23/2009 6:14:50 PM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

I am not a big Microsoft fan, but after Vista, I am hoping that 7 is an improvement.

Technically, Windows 2000 is also Windows 4. Windows XP is Windows 5. Vista would be 6. The next iteration would be 7.

I wish they would stick with numbers. I don’t like years because the product sounds dated when it isn’t (Illustrator 88 comes to mind).

A straight numbering scheme is straightfrward. And please, no more than three versions (home, pro and server/enterprise).


7 posted on 10/23/2009 6:15:52 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic
Windows version 7?

Yes I think so.

8 posted on 10/23/2009 6:16:24 PM PDT by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013 The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
What does the "7" mean in Windows "7"?

It doesn't mean anything...nobody makes the first jump.

9 posted on 10/23/2009 6:16:41 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
What does the "7" mean in Windows "7"?

It doesn't mean anything...nobody makes the first jump.

10 posted on 10/23/2009 6:16:44 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Named for the movie with Morgan Freeman and Brad Pitt:

No matter how hard you try to stop it, it destroys your life in the end...


11 posted on 10/23/2009 6:17:30 PM PDT by bigheadfred (Be who you are and say what you feel: Those who mind don't matter.Those who matter don't mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Hmm... since Windows 2000 was a successor to Windows NT, which was went up to NT 4.0, maybe 2000 is 5.0 with XP being 5.2. Okay ... they lost me somewhere.


12 posted on 10/23/2009 6:18:01 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
Hmm... since Windows 2000 was a successor to Windows NT, which was went up to NT 4.0, maybe 2000 is 5.0 with XP being 5.2. Okay ... they lost me somewhere.

You have never spun the record "Stairway to Heaven" backwards and got an evil message have you. ; )

13 posted on 10/23/2009 6:20:52 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

“Hmm... since Windows 2000 was a successor to Windows NT, which was went up to NT 4.0, maybe 2000 is 5.0 with XP being 5.2. Okay ... they lost me somewhere.”

Vista would be 6, and this would be 7.

The rest is a bad attempt at humor.


14 posted on 10/23/2009 6:21:06 PM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs
the meaning of 7 and of all other things
15 posted on 10/23/2009 6:21:13 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

Personally my favorite 7 was on Star Trek.


16 posted on 10/23/2009 6:24:56 PM PDT by animal172 (Why doesn't affirmative action apply to the NBA or NFL?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I am not a big Microsoft fan, but after Vista, I am hoping that 7 is an improvement.

FWIW, I read one review today that said "Apple is going to miss Vista."

17 posted on 10/23/2009 6:26:41 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

1 - Windows 3.1 (or 3.11)
2- Windows 95
3 - Windows 98
4 - Windows Me
5- Windows XP
6 - Windows Vista
7 - Windows 7


18 posted on 10/23/2009 6:26:54 PM PDT by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

7: What the program will cost in dollars at second-hand stores and Goodwill bins.


19 posted on 10/23/2009 6:28:53 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

I’ll try again.

7: What the program will cost in dollars in 7 years at second-hand stores and Goodwill bins.


20 posted on 10/23/2009 6:29:42 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: animal172

Of course. 7 of 9, how can we forget her.

And you know what, come to think of it, she was the one person who elected Obama a Senator of Illinois, which led him to. . .

She had divorced Jack Ryan, then the current GOP candidate for U.S. Senate, and a controvery sunk his candidacy. His evil deeds? The press made the courts cough up 7 of 9’s divorce papers, and she had “claimed” he wanted her to have public sex with him in a public sex club. He had to step aside as the GOP candidate, no one else took it up, and Alan Keyes finally carried the flag but couldn’t top. . .Barack!!

Damn, 7 of 9 may be personally responsible, in a time warp kind of way, for all of our current troubles. Beam me up already,


21 posted on 10/23/2009 6:35:20 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

7th times a charm. maybe ...


22 posted on 10/23/2009 6:39:35 PM PDT by kickonly88 (I love fossil fuel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkleesma

Means nothing to me. I’m a Mac man.


23 posted on 10/23/2009 6:49:51 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (ON 1-19-09 GAS WAS, ON AVERAGE IN MEMPHIS, $1.43 A GALLON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs; NewRomeTacitus; cripplecreek; creeping death; JeffreyH; RandallFlagg; cschroe; ...

Seven Deadly Sins
Seven Ways to Win
Seven Holy Paths to Hell and Your Trip Begins
Seven Downward Slopes
Seven Bloodied Hopes
Seven Are Your Burning Fires
Seven Your Desires


24 posted on 10/23/2009 6:49:56 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues; animal172; SevenofNine
Of course. 7 of 9, how can we forget her.

She's a Freeper!

25 posted on 10/23/2009 6:51:44 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mkleesma

You forgot Windows NT 3.5, Windows NT 4.0, and Windows 2000 (Server and Workstation). Win2k was NT 5.0. After that, I’m not sure how the numbering went.


26 posted on 10/23/2009 6:52:09 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

the NT versions and 2000 were business versions. 3.1, 95, 98, ME, XP and VISTA were home consumer oriented.


27 posted on 10/23/2009 6:58:35 PM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

It means they’ll require you to install updates 7 out of 7 days of the week.

And after each and every one your computer “might” (heh heh) need to be restarted.


28 posted on 10/23/2009 7:01:51 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ikemeister
the NT versions and 2000 were business versions. 3.1, 95, 98, ME, XP and VISTA were home consumer oriented.

Kinda sorta. Both XP and Vista have home and business versions. The business versions have more robust networking features, including the ability to be joined to a Windows Domain.

Windows 7 also comes in different flavors.

29 posted on 10/23/2009 7:11:53 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ikemeister

I forgot to mention that XP and Vista are both built on the NT kernel, whereas 95, 98, and ME were not.

Ok, I’m done now.


30 posted on 10/23/2009 7:13:36 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

Me neither....Running Snow Leopard


31 posted on 10/23/2009 7:13:50 PM PDT by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

Yes!


32 posted on 10/23/2009 7:15:10 PM PDT by wastedyears (Clyde Shelton is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

the number of seconds before you realize that you’ve made another Windows upgrade mistake.


33 posted on 10/23/2009 7:25:44 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

It means Microsoft numbers their operating systems like apple has for years.


34 posted on 10/23/2009 7:25:44 PM PDT by lonestar67 ("I love my country a lot more than I love politics," President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
FWIW, I read one review today that said "Apple is going to miss Vista."

Before the return of Jobs, Apple (barely) survived a series of missteps and missed products. Quickdraw GX, Pink, model specific extension enablers, the 68040, the Performa line, were all problematic (late, unwanted, or just didn't work). I want both companies and Linux providers to make good products.
35 posted on 10/23/2009 7:26:12 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Grizzled Bear

LOL!


37 posted on 10/23/2009 7:38:34 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; CJacobs
Technically, Windows 2000 is also Windows 4. Windows XP is Windows 5. Vista would be 6. The next iteration would be 7.

Windows NT 4 was version 4. Windows 2000 is version 5. Windows XP is version 5.1.

38 posted on 10/23/2009 7:39:54 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

The 7th generation of Windoze?


39 posted on 10/23/2009 7:44:31 PM PDT by smokingfrog (No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

Seven is the number of perfection.

Now, considering the subject matter, THAT’S humor!


40 posted on 10/23/2009 7:44:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If they won't "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," they won't secure yours either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJacobs

Windows 7 is going to be a hit. Period.


41 posted on 10/23/2009 7:58:09 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (0bama is my President...and he's out to get me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

A lot of the posts in this thread are made out of sheer ignorance. This is hands down the best OS release from Microsoft...Well, ever.

I dual-booted it in Beta 1 with my XP partition since the beginning of the year, before taking the unprecedented step of deleting my RTM OS to use a *beta* as my primary OS. This system went from January to August (upgrading successfully to the release candidate) without a single blue screen or error that wasn’t user or application-related until I went to the final release version in early August.

While the user interface still isn’t quite as aesthetically pleasing as OSX (in my opinion) and the Start Menu still tends to get disorganized if it isn’t maintained, there is nothing at all wrong with Windows 7, except perhaps the shadow of previous glitchy operating systems inclining the peanut gallery toward smug (if uninformed) predictions of failure.

It’s not an OSX killer, but it’s far better than most of you are giving it credit for, and has put Apple on notice that they’re going to have to start innovating again to keep the lead.

This is a rock solid OS on my machine, and I stress the hell out of it.


42 posted on 10/23/2009 8:08:43 PM PDT by Heavyrunner (Socialize this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner

1=Windows 1 Obscure and not popular
2=Windows 2 Obscure and not to popular,
3=Windows 3.0,3.1,3.11WinforWorkgroups,First Successful version
4 =Windows 95,98,98SE still had Elements of DOS
5=NT,2000, XP
6=Vista
7=Windows 7


43 posted on 10/23/2009 8:22:13 PM PDT by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner

7? ,, Sure I know ... that’s the number of weeks before I can get a cracked .. no activation ,, bulletproof (in regards to WGA) copy shipped in from Hong Kong for $7 ...


44 posted on 10/23/2009 8:27:11 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
Here's the record in a nutshell

Windows versions
1.) Windows 1(I think was never released),
2.)Windows 2
3.) windows 3, then 3.11.
4.) Windows NT came out in 1993(the first version)
5.) Win95 in 1995, there was then several iterations of Win95, ending with Win95C
6.)Windows NT workstation in 1996
7.)Windows 98 in 1998 followed by Win98SE
8.)Windows ME in 2000
9.)Windows 2000 in 2000
10.)Windows XP in 2001
11.)Windows Vista
12.)And now..TA DA: Windows 7

45 posted on 10/23/2009 8:43:24 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Johansen

See my post #45, you lumped too many versions together, including 95 and 98, you also left out ME. I count 12 versions of windows including Windows 7.


46 posted on 10/23/2009 8:45:29 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
the number of seconds before you realize that you’ve made another Windows upgrade mistake

I upgraded today from vista home and I dont see any boost in performance, just a few bells and whistles... If I could turn back time.... I probably would have just statyed with vista since I never had any problems with it in the first place.
47 posted on 10/23/2009 8:48:35 PM PDT by VastRWCon (Drill Baby Drill - Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

.

Does it have a cool new GUI like BOB did?

.

48 posted on 10/23/2009 9:03:00 PM PDT by polymuser ("We have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!" (HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Thanks for the listing. I actually remember the older ones better. Windows 1.0 was released, and often came free with Microsoft Mouse (Serial or mouse port versions). Excel and Aldus PageMaker were early Windows Apps. It would run on an 8088 or better. Windows 2.0, 2.1 (also called Windows 286, though it would run on an 8086 or equivalent), and Windows 386 (optimized for the 80386 chip). We can't forget Windows 3.12, or Windows for Workgroups. Windows NT started with 3.1, I believe.

Once you hit 2000, you come up to a myriad of Server and Enterprise and Web whatever versions. It got completely out of hand.

I played with Windows 1.0 in college, and my first purchased version was 2.0, which I upgraded to 2.1 for $40. (A lot of money for a marginal upgrade)
49 posted on 10/23/2009 9:08:22 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I wish they would stick with numbers. I don’t like years because the product sounds dated when it isn’t

It does seem that any MS OS with a 'name' has been a dog.

Millenium
Vista

50 posted on 10/24/2009 4:31:58 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson